Electromyographic effects of foot orthotics on selected lower extremity muscles during running

      This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.


      Objective: To study the effects of foot orthotics on the mean electromyographic amplitude of proximal and distal lower extremity muscle groups during the first 50% of the stance phase during treadmill running.
      Design: Repeated measures.
      Setting: Subjects were recruited from the general community.
      Participants: Twelve recreational runners who were symptomatic for lower extremity pain. Clinical and radiographic findings confirmed the presence of structural malalignment of the foot.
      Intervention: Semirigid orthotics were fabricated for each subject, and like footwear provided.
      Main Outcome Measures: Surface electromyogram activity from the tibialis anterior, medial gastrocnemius, vastus medialis, vastus lateralis, and biceps femoris was collected during treadmill running at self-selected speeds for orthotic and nonorthotic conditions. Root mean square values were averaged across 10 cycles, normalized to time and expressed as a percentage of the nonorthotic condition.
      Results: Paired t test results showed statistically significant changes (p < .05) for the biceps femoris (−11.1%) and tibialis anterior (+37.5%) muscle groups during the orthotic condition. Electromyographic activity in the medial gastrocnemius, vastus medialis, and vastus lateralis with orthotic use was not significantly different from the nonorthotic condition.
      Conclusion: Although subjects' electromyographic responses to orthotic use were highly individualized, the findings of this study may enhance our understanding of muscle activity changes associated with positive outcomes from orthotic use.


        • James S
        • Jones D
        Biomechanical aspects of distance running injuries.
        in: Cavanagh P.R. Biomechanics of distance running. Human Kinetics Books, Champaign (IL)1990: 249-269
        • Simkin A
        • Leicher I
        • Giladi M
        • Stein M
        • Milgrom C
        Combined effect of foot arch structure and an orthotic device on stress fractures.
        Foot Ankle. 1989; 10: 25-29
        • Cowan D.N.
        • Jones B.H.
        • Robinson J.R.
        Foot morphologic characteristics and risk of exercise-related injury.
        Arch Fam Med. 1993; 2: 773-777
        • Smith L
        • Clarke T
        • Hamill C
        • Santopietro F
        The effects of soft and semi-rigid orthoses upon rearfoot movement in running.
        J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 1986; 76: 227-233
        • Apkarian J
        • Naumann S
        • Cairns B
        A three-dimensional kinematic and dynamic model of the lower limb.
        J Biomech. 1989; 22: 143-155
        • Lockard M.A.
        Foot orthoses.
        Phys Ther. 1988; 68: 1866-1873
        • D'Ambrosia R
        Orthotic devices in running injuries.
        Clin Sports Med. 1985; 4: 611-617
        • Gross M
        • Davlin L
        • Evanski M
        Effectiveness of orthotic shoe inserts in the long-distance runner.
        Am J Sports Med. 1991; 19: 409-412
        • Donatelli R
        • Hurlbert C
        • Conaway D
        • St. Pierre R
        Biomechanical foot orthotics: a retrospective study.
        J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1988; 10: 205-212
        • McCulloch M
        • Brunt D
        • Vanderlinden D
        The effect of foot orthotics and gait velocity on lower limb kinematics and temporal events of stance.
        J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1993; 17: 2-10
        • Novick A
        • Kelley D
        Position and movement changes of the foot with orthotic intervention during the loading response of gait.
        J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1990; 11: 301-312
        • Rodgers M.M.
        • Leveau B
        Effectiveness of foot orthotic devices used to modify pronation in runners.
        J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1982; 4: 86-90
        • Eng J.J.
        • Pierrynowski M.R.
        The effect of soft orthotics on three-dimensional lower limb kinematics during walking and running.
        Phys Ther. 1994; 74: 836-844
        • Nawoczenski D.A.
        • Cook T.M.
        • Saltzman C.L.
        The effect of foot orthotics on three-dimensional kinematics of the leg and rearfoot during running.
        J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1995; 21: 317-327
        • Nigg B.M.
        • Khan A
        • Fisher V
        • Stefanyshyn D
        Effect of shoe insert construction on foot and leg movement.
        Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998; 30: 550-555
        • Tomaro J
        • Burdett R.G.
        The effects of foot orthotics on the EMG activity of selected leg muscles during gait.
        J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1993; 18: 532-536
        • Simkin A.
        • Leichter I
        Role of the calcaneal inclination in the energy storage capacity of the human foot—a biomechanical model.
        Med Biol Eng Comput. 1990; 28: 149-152
        • Komi P.V.
        • Gollhofer A.
        • Schmidtbleicher D
        • Frick U
        Interaction between man and shoe in running: considerations for a more comprehensive measurement approach.
        Int J Sports Med. 1987; 8: 196-202
        • Elliott B.C.
        • Blanksby B.A.
        The synchronization of muscle activity and body segment movements during a running cycle.
        Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1979; 11: 322-327
        • McClay I.S.
        • Lake M.J.
        • Cavanagh P.R.
        Muscle activity in running.
        in: Cavanagh P.R. Biomechanics of distance running. Human Kinetics Books, Champaign (IL)1990: 249-269
        • Engsberg J.R.
        • Andrews J.G.
        Kinematic analysis of the talocalcaneal/ talocrual joint during running support.
        Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1987; 19: 275-284
        • Areblad M.
        • Nigg B
        • Ekstrand J
        • Olsson K
        • Ekstrom H
        Three-dimensional measurement of rearfoot motion during running.
        J Biomech. 1990; 23: 933-940
        • Clarke T.E.
        • Frederick E
        • Hamill C
        The effects of shoe design parameters on rearfoot control in running.
        Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1983; 15: 376-381
        • Brand P.W.
        • Coleman W.C.
        A standard for dorsal-plantar and lateral radiographic projections of the feet.
        Orthopedics. 1987; 10: 117-120
        • Nawoczenski D.A.
        • Saltzman C.L.
        • Cook T.M.
        The effect of foot structure on the three-dimensional kinematic coupling behavior of the leg and rear foot.
        Phys Ther. 1998; 78: 404-416
        • Zipp P.
        Recommendations for the standardization of lead positions in surface electromyography.
        Eur J Appl Physiol. 1982; 50: 41-54
        • Eng J.J.
        • Pierrynowski M.R.
        Evaluation of soft foot orthotics in the treatment of patellofemoral pain syndrome.
        Phys Ther. 1993; 73: 62-69
        • MacIntyre D.L.
        • Robertson G.E.
        Quadriceps muscle activity in women runners with and without patellofemoral pain syndrome.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992; 73: 10-14
        • Taunton J.
        • Clement D
        • Smart G
        A triplanar electrogoniometric investigation of running mechanics in runners with compensatory overpronation.
        Can J Appl Sports Sci. 1985; 10: 104-115