ABILHAND: A Rasch-built measure of manual ability

  • Massimo Penta
    Rehabilitation and Physical Medicine Unit, Catholic University of Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
    Search for articles by this author
  • Jean-Louis Thonnard
    Reprint requests to J.L. Thonnard, PhD, Rehabilitation and Physical Medicine Unit, Catholic University of Louvain, Tour Pasteur (5375), Avenue Mounier 53, 1200 Brussels, Belgium.
    Rehabilitation and Physical Medicine Unit, Catholic University of Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
    Search for articles by this author
  • Luigi Tesio
    Department of Rehabilitation and Department of Research, Functional Assessment and Quality Assurance, “Salvatore Maugeri” Foundation, Instituto di Ricoverdo e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Pavia, Italy
    Search for articles by this author
      This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.


      Objective: To apply the Rasch measurement model to the development of a clinical tool for measuring manual (dis)ability (ABILHAND).
      Design: Manual ability was evaluated in terms of the difficulty perceived by a hand-impaired patient on 57 representative unimanual or bimanual activities.
      Setting: A clinical laboratory.
      Patients: Eighteen rheumatoid arthritis patients (14 women, 4 men) were interviewed after wrist arthrodesis (10 right, 4 left, and 4 both wrists). Their ages ranged from 38 to 77 years, time since diagnosis ranged from 7 to 41 years, and time since surgery ranged from 0.5 to 17 years.
      Main Outcome Measure: ABILHAND, administered at a mean duration of 7 years after arthrodesis.
      Results: Forty-six of the 57 items define a common, single manual ability continuum with widespread measurement range and regular item distribution. Items relating to feeding, grooming, and dressing upper body worked consistently with their counterparts in other disability scales. More difficult items extend the measurement range beyond that of most existing manual ability scales.
      Conclusion: Even in a small sample of patients, using the Rasch methodology enabled the investigators to produce a useful scale of manual (dis)ability and to define manual ability as a unique construct, at least in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Jones LA
        The assessment of hand function: a critical review of techniques.
        J Hand Surg [Am]. 1989; 14: 221-228
        • Thonnard JL
        • Plaghki L
        • Bragard D
        Evamain: computerized system for the evaluation of the hand.
        in: Scuind F An KN Cooney WP Garcia-Elias M Advances in the biomechanics of the hand and wrist. Plenum Press, New York1994: 499-510
        • Carroll D
        A quantitative test of upper extremity function.
        J Chron Dis. 1965; 18: 479-491
        • De Souza LH
        • Hewer RL
        • Miller S
        Assessment of recovery of arm control in hemiplegic stroke patients. 1. Arm function tests.
        Int Rehabil Med. 1980; 2: 3-9
        • Desrosiers J
        • Hébert R
        • Bravo G
        • Dutil E
        Upper extremity performance test for the elderly (TEMPA): normative data and correlates with sensorimotor parameters.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995; 76: 1125-1129
        • Heller A
        • Wade DT
        • Wook VA
        • Sunderland A
        • Hewer RL
        • Ward E
        Arm function after stroke: measurement and recovery over the first three months.
        J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1987; 50: 714-719
        • Jebsen RH
        • Taylor N
        • Trieschmann RB
        • Trotter MJ
        • Howard LA
        An objective and standardized test of hand function.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1969; 50: 311-319
        • Lindmark B
        • Hamrin E
        • T6rnquist K
        Testing daily functions post-stroke with standardized practical equipment.
        Scand J Rehabil Med. 1990; 22: 9-14
        • Lyle RC
        A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research.
        Int J Rehabil Res. 1981; 4: 483-492
        • Potvin AR
        • Tortelotte WW
        • Dailey JS
        • Alberts JW
        • Walker JE
        • Pew RW
        • et al.
        Simulated activities of daily living examination.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1972; 53: 476-486
        • Wilson DJ
        • Baker LL
        • Craddock JA
        Functional test for the hemiparetic upper extremity.
        Am J Occup Ther. 1984; 38: 159-164
        • World Health Organization
        International classification of impairments, disabilities, and handicaps.
        World Health Organization, Geneva1980
        • Bach-y-Rita P
        Brain plasticity as a basis of the development of rehabilitation procedures for hemiplegia.
        Scand J Rehabil Med. 1981; 13: 73-83
        • Merbitz C
        • Morris J
        • Grip JC
        Ordinal scales and foundations of misinference.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1989; 70: 308-312
        • Wright BD
        • Linacre JM
        Observations are always ordinal; measurement, however, must be interval.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1989; 70: 857-860
        • Fisher AG
        Functional measures, part 2: selecting the right test, minimizing the limitations.
        Am J Occup Ther. 1992; 46: 278-281
        • Rasch G
        Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests.
        Mesa Press, Chicago1992
        • Wright BD
        • Masters GN
        Rating scale analysis.
        Mesa Press, Chicago1982
        • Myers AM
        • Holliday PJ
        • Harvey KA
        • Hutchison KS
        Functional performance measures: are they superior to self-assessments?.
        J Gerontol. 1993; 48: M196-M206
        • Tesio L
        Disability, dependence and performance: which is which?.
        Europa Medicophysica. 1997; 33: 55-57
        • Mannerfelt L
        • Malmsten M
        Arthrodesis of the wrist in rheumatoid arthritis.
        in: A technique without external fixation. 6th ed. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 5. 1971: 124-130
        • Linacre JM
        Categorical misfit statistics.
        Rasch Measurement Trans. 1995; 9: 450-451
        • Andrich D
        Category ordering and their utility.
        Rasch Measurement Trans. 1996; 9: 464-465
        • Linacre JM
        • Wright BD
        BIGSTEPS: Rasch model computer program.
        Mesa Press, Chicago1994
        • Anastasi A
        Psychological testing.
        6th ed. Maxwell Macmillan International, New York1990
        • Fisher WP
        Reliability statistics.
        Rasch Measurement Trans. 1992; 6: 238
        • Wright BD
        • Linacre JM
        Reasonable mean-square fit values.
        Rasch Measurement Trans. 1994; 8: 370
        • Tennant A
        • Hillman M
        • Fear J
        • Pickering A
        • Chamberlain MA
        Are we making the most of the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire?.
        Br J Rheumatol. 1996; 35: 574-578
        • Fries JF
        • Spitz P
        • Kraines RG
        • Holman HR
        Measurement of patient outcome in arthritis.
        Arthritis Rheum. 1980; 23: 137-145
        • Kirwan JR
        • Reeback JS
        Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire modified to assess disability in British patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
        Br J Rheumatol. 1986; 25: 206-209
        • Heinemann AW
        • Hamilton BB
        • Granger CV
        • Wright BD
        • Linacre JM
        • Betts HB
        • et al.
        Rating scale analysis of functional assessment measures.
        in: Final report to the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research. Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Chicago1991
        • Brown RG
        • MacCarthy B
        • Jahanshahi M
        • Mardsen CD
        Accuracy of self-reported disability in patients with parkinsonism.
        Arch Neurol. 1989; 46: 955-959