Advertisement

Response to Letter to the Editor on “Effects of Electrical Stimulation Training on Body Composition Parameters After Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review”

Published:December 16, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2022.11.011
      List of Abbreviations: DXA, dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry; FES, functional electrical stimulation; ISNCSCI, international standards for neurologic classification of spinal cord injury; NMES, neuromuscualr elctrical stimulation; NMES-RT, neuromuscular electrical stimulation-resitance training; PICOS, Patient, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, Study Design; RCT, randomized controlled trial; SCI, spinal cord injury
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Hassan A
        • Jahan A
        • Elsareih A
        • Bochkezanian V
        • Musselman KE
        • Gorgey A.
        Effects of electrical stimulation training on body composition parameters after spinal cord injury: a systematic review.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2022; 103: 1168-1178
        • Blight AR
        • Hsieh J
        • Curt A
        • et al.
        The challenge of recruitment for neurotherapeutic clinical trials in spinal cord injury.
        Spinal Cord. 2019; 57: 348-359
        • Waffenschmidt S
        • Knelangen M
        • Sieben W
        • Bühn S
        • Pieper D.
        Single screening versus conventional double screening for study selection in systematic reviews: a methodological systematic review.
        BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019; 19: 132
        • Furuya-Kanamori L
        • Xu C
        • Hasan SS
        • Doi SA.
        Quality versus risk-of-bias assessment in clinical research.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 2021; 129: 172-175
        • Downs SH
        • Black N.
        The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions.
        J Epidemiol Commun Health. 1998; 52: 377-384
        • Deeks JJ
        • Dinnes J
        • D'Amico R
        • et al.
        International Stroke Trial Collaborative Group; European Carotid Surgery Trial Collaborative Group. Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies.
        Health Technol Assess. 2003; 7 (iii-x): 1-173
        • Fenton JM
        • King JA
        • Hoekstra SP
        • Valentino SE
        • Phillips SM
        • VL Goosey-Tolfrey
        Protocols aiming to increase muscle mass in persons with motor complete spinal cord injury: a systematic review.
        Disabil Rehabil. 2022; : 1-11

      Linked Article