Advertisement

Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System: Identifying Barriers, Facilitators, and Strategies for Implementation in Research, Education, and Clinical Care

Published:October 25, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2022.09.021

      Abstract

      Objective

      To explore rehabilitation professionals' experiences and perspectives of barriers and facilitators to implementing the Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System (RTSS) in research, education, and clinical care.

      Design

      A cross-sectional survey with free text and binary responses was completed by rehabilitation professionals. Survey data were analyzed with a deductive approach of directed content analysis using 2 implementation science frameworks: Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC).

      Setting

      Rehabilitation professionals across research, educational, and clinical settings.

      Participants

      One hundred and eleven rehabilitation professionals—including speech-language pathologists, occupational therapists, physical therapists, physicians, psychologists, researchers, and clinic directors—who explored possible uses or applications of the RTSS for clinical care, education, or research (N=111).

      Interventions

      Not applicable.

      Main Outcome Measures

      Frequency of reported CFIR barriers and facilitators, as well as keywords related to CFIR and ERIC constructs.

      Results

      The barriers and facilitating strategies differed according to the end-users’ intended use, that is, research, education, or clinical. Overall, the 4 most frequently encountered CFIR barriers were the RTSS's complexity, a lack of available RTSS resources, reduced access to knowledge and information about the RTSS, and limited knowledge and beliefs about the RTSS. The ERIC-CFIR matching tool identified 7 ERIC strategies to address these barriers, which include conducting educational meetings, developing and distributing educational materials, accessing new funding, capturing and sharing local knowledge, identifying and preparing champions, and promoting adaptability.

      Conclusions

      When attempting to use the RTSS, rehabilitation professionals commonly encountered barriers to understanding and skillfully using the framework. Theory-driven implementation strategies have been identified that have potential for addressing the RTSS's complexity and lack of educational and skill-building resources. Future work can develop the identified implementation strategies and evaluate their effects on RTSS implementation.

      Key words

      List of abbreviations:

      CFIR (Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research), ERIC (Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change), OT (occupational therapist), PT (physical therapist), RTSS (Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System), SLP (speech language pathologist)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Wade DT.
        Research into the black box of rehabilitation: the risks of a Type III error.
        Clin Rehab. 2001; 15: 1-4
        • Dijkers MP
        • Kropp GC
        • Esper RM
        • Yavuzer G
        • Cullen N
        • Bakdalieh Y.
        Quality of intervention research reporting in medical rehabilitation journals.
        Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2002; 81: 21-33
        • Wilson BA.
        How do we know that rehabilitation works?.
        Neuropsychol Rehabil. 1993; 3: 1-4
        • Dijkers MP
        • Millis SR.
        The template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) as a measure of intervention reporting quality: Rasch analysis.
        Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. 2020; 2100055
        • Van Stan JH
        • Dijkers MP
        • Whyte J
        • et al.
        The rehabilitation treatment specification system: implications for improvements in research design, reporting, replication, and synthesis.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019; 100: 146-155
        • Hart T
        • Dijkers MP
        • Whyte J
        • et al.
        A theory-driven system for the specification of rehabilitation treatments.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019; 100: 172-180
        • Whyte J
        • Dijkers MP
        • Hart T
        • et al.
        The importance of voluntary behavior in rehabilitation treatment and outcomes.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019; 100: 156-163
        • Zanca JM
        • Turkstra LS
        • Chen C
        • et al.
        Advancing rehabilitation practice through improved specification of interventions.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019; 100: 164-171
        • Van Stan JH
        • Whyte J
        • Duffy JR
        • et al.
        Voice therapy according to the Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System (RTSS-Voice): expert consensus ingredients and targets.
        Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2021; 30: 2169-2201
        • Meulenbroek P
        • Ness B
        • Lemoncello R
        • et al.
        Social communication following traumatic brain injury part 2: identifying effective treatment ingredients.
        Int J Speech-Lang Pathol. 2019; 21: 128-142
        • Sikkes SA
        • Tang Y
        • Jutten RJ
        • et al.
        Toward a theory-based specification of non-pharmacological treatments in aging and dementia: focused reviews and methodological recommendations.
        Alzheimers Dement. 2021; 17: 255-270
        • Boyle M
        • Gordon JK
        • Harnish SM
        • et al.
        Evaluating cognitive-linguistic approaches to interventions for aphasia within the rehabilitation treatment specification system.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2022; 103: 590-598
        • Fridriksson J
        • Basilakos A
        • Boyle M
        • et al.
        Demystifying the complexity of aphasia treatment: application of the rehabilitation treatment specification systemx.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2022; 103: 574-580
        • Basilakos A
        • Hula WD
        • Johnson LP
        • Kiran S
        • Walker GM
        • Fridriksson J.
        Defining the neurobiological mechanisms of action in aphasia therapies: applying the RTSS framework to research and practice in aphasia.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2022; 103: 581-589
        • Cherney LR
        • DeDe G
        • Hoover EL
        • Murray L
        • Obermeyer J
        • Pompon RH.
        Applying the rehabilitation treatment specification system to functional communication treatment approaches for aphasia.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2022; 103: 599-609
        • Van Stan JH
        • Whyte J
        • Duffy JR
        • et al.
        Rehabilitation treatment specification system: methodology to identify and describe unique targets and ingredients.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021; 102: 521-531
      1. Wengerd LR. Advancing rehabilitation research through characterization of conventional occupational therapy for adult stroke survivors with upper extremity hemiparesis. The Ohio State University; 2019. https://etd.ohiolink.edu/apexprod/rws_olink/r/1501/10?clear=10&p10_accession_num=osu1574743933864793. Accessed November 29, 2022.

        • Kinney AR
        • Eakman AM
        • Graham JE.
        Novel effect size interpretation guidelines and an evaluation of statistical power in rehabilitation research.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020; 101: 2219-2226
        • Kinney AR
        • Middleton A
        • Graham JE.
        Evaluating the strength of evidence in favor of rehabilitation effects: a Bayesian analysis.
        Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2022; 65101503
        • Whyte J
        • Dijkers MP
        • Fasoli SE
        • et al.
        Recommendations for reporting on rehabilitation interventions.
        Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2021; 100: 5-16
        • Ness BM
        • O'Neil-Pirozzi T
        • Meulenbroek P.
        Three speech-language pathology graduate programs, one model: using systematic instruction to develop students’ clinical decision-making skills.
        Teach Learn Commun Sci Disord. 2021; 5: 4
        • Fasoli SE
        • Ferraro MK
        • Lin SH.
        Occupational therapy can benefit from an interprofessional rehabilitation treatment specification system.
        Am J Occup Ther. 2019; 73 (7302347010p1-p6)
        • Jette AM.
        Opening the black box of rehabilitation interventions.
        Phys Ther. 2020; 100: 883-884
        • Turkstra LS
        • Norman R
        • Whyte J
        • Dijkers MP
        • Hart T.
        Knowing what we're doing: why specification of treatment methods is critical for evidence-based practice in speech-language pathology.
        Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2016; 25: 164-171
        • Bauer MS
        • Kirchner J.
        Implementation science: what is it and why should I care?.
        Psychiatr Res. 2020; 283112376
        • Glasgow RE
        • Vinson C
        • Chambers D
        • Khoury MJ
        • Kaplan RM
        • Hunter C.
        National Institutes of Health approaches to dissemination and implementation science: current and future directions.
        Am J Public Health. 2012; 102: 1274-1281
        • Birken SA
        • Powell BJ
        • Shea CM
        • et al.
        Criteria for selecting implementation science theories and frameworks: results from an international survey.
        Implement Sci. 2017; 12: 1-9
        • Nilsen P
        • Bernhardsson S.
        Context matters in implementation science: a scoping review of determinant frameworks that describe contextual determinants for implementation outcomes.
        BMC Health Serv Res. 2019; 19: 1-21
        • Ridde V
        • Pérez D
        • Robert E.
        Using implementation science theories and frameworks in global health.
        BMJ Glob Health. 2020; 5e002269
        • Damschroder LJ
        • Aron DC
        • Keith RE
        • Kirsh SR
        • Alexander JA
        • Lowery JC.
        Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science.
        Implement Sci. 2009; 4: 50
        • Waltz TJ
        • Powell BJ
        • Chinman MJ
        • et al.
        Expert recommendations for implementing change (ERIC): protocol for a mixed methods study.
        Implement Sci. 2014; 9: 1-12
        • Camden C
        • Shikako-Thomas K
        • Nguyen T
        • et al.
        Engaging stakeholders in rehabilitation research: a scoping review of strategies used in partnerships and evaluation of impacts.
        Disabil Rehabil. 2015; 37: 1390-1400
        • Schippke J
        • Provvidenza C
        • Kingsnorth S.
        Peer support for families of children with complex needs: development and dissemination of a best practice toolkit.
        Child Care Health Dev. 2017; 43: 823-830
        • Gaugler JE
        • Gitlin LN
        • Zimmerman S.
        Aligning dementia care science with the urgent need for dissemination and implementation.
        J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2021; 22: 2036-2038
        • Juckett LA
        • Bunger AC
        • Jarrott SE
        • et al.
        Determinants of fall prevention guideline implementation in the home-and community-based service setting.
        Gerontologist. 2021; 61: 942-953
        • Juckett LA
        • Wengerd LR
        • Faieta J
        • Griffin CE.
        Evidence-based practice implementation in stroke rehabilitation: a scoping review of barriers and facilitators.
        Am J Occup Ther. 2020; 74 (7401205050p1-p14)
        • Waltz TJ
        • Powell BJ
        • Fernandez ME
        • Abadie B
        • Damschroder LJ.
        Choosing implementation strategies to address contextual barriers: diversity in recommendations and future directions.
        Implement Sci. 2019; 14: 1-15