Advertisement

Relevance of the Activities-Specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale to Urban Community-Dwelling Adults With Diagnosed Vestibular Dysfunction

Published:September 29, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2022.09.009

      Highlights

      • The Activities-based Balance Confidence Scale has been used to measure fall risk.
      • The relevancy of these questions has not been evaluated for an urban population.
      • Distributed a modified ABC survey assessing the relevance of individual prompts.
      • Found certain items were less relevant to those in an urban setting.

      Objective

      To determine how relevant the items on the activities-specific balance confidence (ABC) scale are to patients living in an urban setting and to evaluate additional items relevant to urban populations but not included in the current version of the scale.

      Design

      Cross-sectional clinical survey.

      Setting

      Urban, tertiary vestibular rehabilitation clinic.

      Participants

      Vestibular rehabilitation clinic outpatients (N=103).

      Interventions

      N/A.

      Main Outcome Measures

      Relevance of 16 day-to-day tasks on the ABC scale on a scale of 0 (not performed) to 10 (performed regularly); median relevancy score (MRS) for most relevant items.

      Results

      One hundred three participants (73.7% female, mean age 61.5± years) with vestibular disorders completed the survey. The items with the highest MRS were walking around a house (MRS=10), reaching for a shelved item eye level (MRS=9), taking the stairs (MRS=7), bending over and picking up a slipper (MRS=7), and stepping onto or off an escalator while holding the railing (MRS=7). Lowest MRS items to someone living in an urban environment included walking across a parking lot to the mall (MRS=0) and walking outside the house to a car parked in the driveway (MRS=0). The most common functional activities not addressed by ABC score included navigating the subway/public transit (35.9%) and walking through crowds (32.0%).

      Conclusions

      This study revealed insights about important activities of daily living for those in an urban setting. Results show that the ABC scale should be modified to better reflect the specific activities of urban dwellers.

      Keywords

      List of abbreviations:

      ABC (activities-specific balance confidence), MRS (median relevancy score)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Agrawal Y
        • Carey JP
        • Della Santina CC
        • Schubert MC
        • Minor LB
        Disorders of balance and vestibular function in US adults: data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2001-2004.
        Arch Intern Med. 2009; 169: 938-944
        • Florence CS
        • Bergen G
        • Atherly A
        • Burns E
        • Stevens J
        • Drake C.
        Medical costs of fatal and nonfatal falls in older adults.
        J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018; 66: 693-698
        • Almajid R
        • Goel R
        • Tucker C
        • Keshner E.
        Balance confidence and turning behavior as a measure of fall risk.
        Gait Posture. 2020; 80: 1-6
        • Thompson LA
        • Badache M
        • Brusamolin JAR
        • et al.
        Investigating relationships between balance confidence and balance ability in older adults.
        J Aging Res. 2021; 20213214366
        • Powell LE
        • Myers AM.
        The activities-specific balance confidence (ABC) scale.
        J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1995; 50: M28-M34
        • Schepens S
        • Goldberg A
        • Wallace M.
        The short version of the activities-specific balance confidence (ABC) scale: its validity, reliability, and relationship to balance impairment and falls in older adults.
        Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2010; 51: 9-12
        • Legters K
        • Whitney SL
        • Porter R
        • Buczek F.
        The relationship between the activities-specific balance confidence scale and the dynamic gait index in peripheral vestibular dysfunction.
        Physiother Res Int. 2005; 10: 10-22
        • Forsberg A
        • Nilsagård Y.
        Validity and reliability of the Swedish version of the activities-specific balance confidence scale in people with chronic stroke.
        Physiother Can. 2013; 65: 141-147
        • Montilla-Ibáñez A
        • Martínez-Amat A
        • Lomas-Vega R
        • et al.
        The activities-specific balance confidence scale: reliability and validity in Spanish patients with vestibular disorders.
        Disabil Rehabil. 2017; 39: 697-703
        • Elboim-Gabyzon M
        • Agmon M
        • Azaiza F.
        Psychometric properties of the Arabic version of the activities-specific balance confidence (ABC) scale in ambulatory, community-dwelling, elderly people.
        Clin Interv Aging. 2019; 14: 1075-1084
        • Freitas RM
        • Ribeiro KF
        • Barbosa JS
        • Gomes CDS
        • Deshpande N
        • Guerra RO.
        Validity and reliability of the Brazilian activities-specific balance confidence scale and determinants of balance confidence in community-dwelling older adults.
        Physiother Theory Pract. 2022; 38: 345-354
        • U.S. Census Bureau (2000, 2010)
        Urban, Urbanized Area, Urban Cluster, and Rural Population.
        (Available at:)
        • Cleary K
        • Skornyakov E.
        Predicting falls in community dwelling older adults using the activities-specific balance confidence scale.
        Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2017; 72: 142-145