Advertisement
ORIGINAL RESEARCH| Volume 104, ISSUE 3, P363-371, March 2023

Internet of Things (IoT) Enables Robot-Assisted Therapy as a Home Program for Training Upper Limb Functions in Chronic Stroke: A Randomized Control Crossover Study

  • Li-Chieh Kuo
    Affiliations
    Department of Occupational Therapy, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan

    Medical Device Innovation Center, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan

    Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan

    Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
    Search for articles by this author
  • Kang-Chin Yang
    Affiliations
    Medical Device Innovation Center, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
    Search for articles by this author
  • Yu-Ching Lin
    Affiliations
    Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan

    Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
    Search for articles by this author
  • Yu-Chen Lin
    Affiliations
    Department of Occupational Therapy, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan

    Department of Occupational Therapy, Da-Yeh University, Changhua, Taiwan
    Search for articles by this author
  • Chien-Hsien Yeh
    Affiliations
    Medical Device Innovation Center, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
    Search for articles by this author
  • Fong-Chin Su
    Affiliations
    Medical Device Innovation Center, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan

    Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
    Search for articles by this author
  • Hsiu-Yun Hsu
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author Hsiu-Yun Hsu, PhD, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, University Road, Taiwan.
    Affiliations
    Department of Occupational Therapy, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan

    Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
    Search for articles by this author
Published:September 16, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2022.08.976

      Abstract

      Objective

      To compare the effects of using an Internet of things (IoT)-assisted tenodesis-induced-grip exoskeleton robot (TIGER) and task-specific motor training (TSMT) as home programs for the upper-limb (UL) functions of patients with chronic stroke to overturn conventional treatment modes for stroke rehabilitation.

      Design

      A randomized 2-period crossover study.

      Setting

      A university hospital.

      Participants

      Eighteen chronic stroke patients were recruited and randomized to receive either the IoT-assisted TIGER first or TSMT first at the beginning of the experiment (N=18).

      Intervention

      In addition to the standard hospital-based therapy, participants were allocated to receive a 30-minute home-based, self-administered program of either IoT-assisted TIGER first or TSMT first twice daily for 4 weeks, with the order of both treatments reversed after a 12-week washout period. The exercise mode of the TIGER training included continuous passive motion and the functional mode of gripping pegs. The TSMT involved various movement components of the wrist and hand.

      Main Outcome Measures

      The outcome measures included the box and block test (BBT), the Fugl-Meyer assessment for upper extremity (FMA-UE), the motor activity log, the Semmes-Weinstein Monofilament test, the range of motion (ROM) of the wrist joint, and the modified Ashworth scale.

      Results

      Significant treatment-by-time interaction effects emerged in the results for the BBT (F(1.31)=5.212 and P=.022), the FMA-UE (F(1.31)=6.807 and P=.042), and the ROM of the wrist extension (F(1.31)=8.618 and P=.009). The participants who trained at home with the IoT-assisted TIGER showed more improvement of their UL functions.

      Conclusions

      The IoT-assisted TIGER training has the potential for restoring the UL functions of stroke patients.

      KEYWORDS

      List of abbreviations:

      AROM (active range of motion), BBT (box and block test), FMA-UE (Fugl-Meyer assessment for upper extremity), IoT (Internet of things), MAL (motor activity log), MAS (modified Ashworth scale), PCGI-I (Patient Clinical Global Impressions-Improvements), ROM (range of motion), SWM (Semmes-Weinstein monofilament), TIGER (tenodesis-induced-grip exoskeleton robot), TSMT (task-specific motor training), UL (upper-limb)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Chen T
        • Zhang B
        • Deng Y
        • Fan J-C
        • Zhang L
        • Song F.
        Long-term unmet needs after stroke: systematic review of evidence from survey studies.
        BMJ Open. 2019; 9e028137
        • Teasell R
        • Mehta S
        • Pereira S
        • et al.
        Time to rethink long-term rehabilitation management of stroke patients.
        Top Stroke Rehabil. 2012; 19: 457-462
        • Party ISW.
        National clinical guideline for stroke.
        Citeseer, London2012
        • Coupar F
        • Pollock A
        • Legg LA
        • Sackley C
        • van Vliet P.
        Home-based therapy programmes for upper limb functional recovery following stroke.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012; 2012CD006755
        • Jolliffe L
        • Lannin NA
        • Cadilhac DA
        • Hoffmann T.
        Systematic review of clinical practice guidelines to identify recommendations for rehabilitation after stroke and other acquired brain injuries.
        BMJ Open. 2018; 8e018791
        • French B
        • Thomas LH
        • Coupe J
        • et al.
        Repetitive task training for improving functional ability after stroke.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016; 11CD006073
        • Basso DM
        • Lang CE.
        Consideration of dose and timing when applying interventions after stroke and spinal cord injury.
        J Neurol Phys Ther. 2017; 41: S24-S31
        • Krebs HI
        • Volpe BT
        • Williams D
        • et al.
        Robot-aided neurorehabilitation: a robot for wrist rehabilitation.
        IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabilitation Eng. 2007; 15: 327-335
        • Yurkewich A
        • Hebert D
        • Wang RH
        • Mihailidis A.
        Hand extension robot orthosis (HERO) glove: development and testing with stroke survivors with severe hand impairment.
        IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2019; 27: 916-926
        • Takahashi CD
        • Der-Yeghiaian L
        • Le V
        • Motiwala RR
        • Cramer SC.
        Robot-based hand motor therapy after stroke.
        Brain. 2008; 131: 425-437
        • Fan YJ
        • Yin YH
        • Da Xu L
        • Zeng Y
        • Wu F
        IoT-based smart rehabilitation system.
        IEEE Trans Ind Inform. 2014; 10: 1568-1577
        • Maceira-Elvira P
        • Popa T
        • Schmid A-C
        • Hummel FC.
        Wearable technology in stroke rehabilitation: towards improved diagnosis and treatment of upper-limb motor impairment.
        J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2019; 16: 142
        • Lenze EJ
        • Lenard E
        • Bland M
        • et al.
        Effect of enhanced medical rehabilitation on functional recovery in older adults receiving skilled nursing care after acute rehabilitation: a randomized clinical trial.
        JAMA Netw Open. 2019; 2 (e)e198199
        • Hsu H-Y
        • Yang K-C
        • Yeh C-H
        • et al.
        A Tenodesis-induced-grip exoskeleton robot (TIGER) for assisting upper extremity functions in stroke patients: a randomized control study.
        Disabil Rehabil. 2021; : 1-9
        • Amirabdollahian F
        • Ates S
        • Basteris A
        • et al.
        Design, development and deployment of a hand/wrist exoskeleton for home-based rehabilitation after stroke-SCRIPT project.
        Robotica. 2014; 32: 1331-1346
        • Gradim LCC
        • José MA
        • da Cruz DMC
        • de Deus Lopes R.
        IoT services and applications in rehabilitation: an interdisciplinary and meta-analysis review.
        IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2020; 28: 2043-2052
        • Woytowicz EJ
        • Rietschel JC
        • Goodman RN
        • et al.
        Determining levels of upper extremity movement impairment by applying a cluster analysis to the Fugl-Meyer assessment of the upper extremity in chronic stroke.
        Arch Pys Med Rehabil. 2017; 98: 456-462
        • Hsu HY
        • Chiu HY
        • Kuan TS
        • Tsai CL
        • Su FC
        • Kuo LC.
        Robotic-assisted therapy with bilateral practice improves task and motor performance in the upper extremities of chronic stroke patients: a randomised controlled trial.
        Aust Occup Ther J. 2019; 66: 637-647
        • Desrosiers J
        • Bravo G
        • Hébert R
        • Dutil É
        • Mercier L.
        Validation of the box and block test as a measure of dexterity of elderly people: reliability, validity, and norms studies.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994; 75: 751-755
        • Connell LA
        • Tyson SF.
        Clinical reality of measuring upper-limb ability in neurologic conditions: a systematic review.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012; 93: 221-228
        • Chen H-M
        • Chen CC
        • Hsueh I-P
        • Huang S-L
        • Hsieh C-L.
        Test-retest reproducibility and smallest real difference of 5 hand function tests in patients with stroke.
        Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009; 23: 435-440
        • Poole JL
        • Whitney S.
        Motor assessment scale for stroke patients: concurrent validity and interrater reliability.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1988; 69: 195-197
        • Wagner JM
        • Rhodes JA
        • Patten C.
        Reproducibility and minimal detectable change of three-dimensional kinematic analysis of reaching tasks in people with hemiparesis after stroke.
        Phys Ther. 2008; 88: 652-663
        • Kim TS
        • Park DDH
        • Lee YB
        • et al.
        A study on the measurement of wrist motion range using the iPhone 4 gyroscope application.
        Ann Plast Surg. 2014; 73: 215-218
        • Charalambous CP.
        Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. Classic papers in orthopaedics.
        Springer, London2014: 415-417
        • Van der Lee J
        • Beckerman H
        • Knol D
        • De Vet H
        • Bouter L.
        Clinimetric properties of the motor activity log for the assessment of arm use in hemiparetic patients.
        Stroke. 2004; 35: 1410-1414
        • Villarroel MF
        • Orsini MB
        • Lima RC
        • Antunes CM.
        Comparative study of the cutaneous sensation of leprosy-suspected lesions using Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments and quantitative thermal testing.
        Lepr Rev. 2007; 78: 102-109
        • Rotenstein LS
        • Huckman RS
        • Wagle NW.
        Making patients and doctors happier—the potential of patient-reported outcomes.
        New Engl J Med. 2017; 377: 1309-1312
        • Mohebbi M
        • Dodd S
        • Dean O
        • Berk M.
        Patient centric measures for a patient centric era: agreement and convergent between ratings on the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) scale and the Clinical Global Impressions–Improvement (CGI-S) scale in bipolar and major depressive disorder.
        Eur Psychiat. 2018; 53: 17-22
        • Wellek S
        • Blettner M.
        On the proper use of the crossover design in clinical trials: part 18 of a series on evaluation of scientific publications.
        Dtsch Ärztebl Int. 2012; 109: 276
        • Page SJ
        • Hade E
        • Persch A.
        Psychometrics of the wrist stability and hand mobility subscales of the Fugl-Meyer assessment in moderately impaired stroke.
        Phys Ther. 2015; 95: 103-108
        • Li X
        • Zhong J.
        Upper limb rehabilitation robot system based on internet of things remote control.
        IEEE Access. 2020; 8: 154461-154470
        • Yang G
        • Deng J
        • Pang G
        • et al.
        An IoT-enabled stroke rehabilitation system based on smart wearable armband and machine learning.
        IEEE Jo Transl Eng Health Med. 2018; 6: 1-10
        • Jeffers MS
        • Karthikeyan S
        • Gomez-Smith M
        • et al.
        Does stroke rehabilitation really matter? Part B: an algorithm for prescribing an effective intensity of rehabilitation.
        Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2018; 32: 73-83
        • Chang WH
        • Kim Y-H.
        Robot-assisted therapy in stroke rehabilitation.
        J Stroke. 2013; 15: 174
        • Vive S
        • Jean-Luc af Geijerstam HG
        • Kuhn LB-K
        Enriched, task-specific therapy in the chronic phase after stroke: an exploratory study.
        J Neurol Phys Ther. 2020; 44: 145
        • Uswatte G
        • Giuliani C
        • Winstein C
        • Zeringue A
        • Hobbs L
        • Wolf SL.
        Validity of accelerometry for monitoring real-world arm activity in patients with subacute stroke: evidence from the extremity constraint-induced therapy evaluation trial.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006; 87: 1340-1345
        • Yuehong Y
        • Zeng Y
        • Chen X
        • Fan Y.
        The internet of things in healthcare: an overview.
        J Ind Inf Integr. 2016; 1: 3-13
        • Pradhan B
        • Bhattacharyya S
        • Pal K.
        IoT-based applications in healthcare devices.
        J Healthc Eng. 2021; 20216632599