Advertisement
ORIGINAL RESEARCH| Volume 104, ISSUE 3, P430-437, March 2023

Initial Evidence for Reliable and Valid Use of Scores on the 8-Item Econ-QOL Short Form to Measure Economic Quality of Life in Caregivers of Persons With Traumatic Brain Injury

Published:August 06, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2022.07.015

      Abstract

      Objective

      To provide reliability and validity data to support the clinical utility of Economic Quality of Life Measure (Econ-QOL) scores in caregivers of civilians and service members/veterans with traumatic brain injury (TBI).

      Design

      Cross-sectional survey study.

      Setting

      Three academic medical centers and a Veterans Affairs treatment facility.

      Participants

      376 caregivers of civilians (n=213) and service members/veterans (n=163) with TBI (N=376).

      Interventions

      N/A.

      Main Outcome Measures

      Econ-QOL and several patient-reported outcome measures (Traumatic Brain Injury Caregiver Quality of Life Caregiver-Specific Anxiety and Caregiver Strain, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System sleep-related impairment, Neurological Quality of Life Measurement System positive affect and well-being) and measures of financial status (self-reported income).

      Results

      Internal consistency reliability of the Econ-QOL Short Form scores were excellent (all Cronbach's alphas ≥.92). There were no floor or ceiling effects for scores. There was evidence of convergent and discriminant validity, with the Econ-QOL scores having the strongest relationships with self-reported income (convergent validity evidence) and weak relationships with the other measures (discriminant validity evidence). Individuals with scores that were “below or possibly below” the poverty line (according to 2016 federal government poverty level thresholds) reported worse economic quality of life relative to those individuals who were definitely above the poverty line, supporting known-groups validity.

      Conclusions

      This article establishes the clinical utility of scores on the Econ-QOL Short Form in caregivers of persons with TBI and provides evidence that it is valid and appropriate to use such scores not only in a variety of different disability populations (eg, spinal cord injury, stroke) but also in caregivers.

      Keywords

      List of abbreviations:

      Econ-QOL (Economic Quality of Life Measure), HRQOL (health-related quality of life), PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System), SMV (service member/veteran), TBI (traumatic brain injury), TBI-CareQOL (Traumatic Brain Injury Caregiver Quality of Life)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Leibson CL
        • Brown AW
        • Long KH
        • et al.
        Medical care costs associated with traumatic brain injury over the full spectrum of disease: a controlled population-based study.
        J Neurotrauma. 2012; 29: 2038-2049
        • Kratz AL
        • Sander AM
        • Brickell TA
        • Lange RT
        • Carlozzi NE.
        Traumatic brain injury caregivers: a qualitative analysis of spouse and parent perspectives on quality of life.
        Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2017; 27: 16-37
        • Marsh NV
        • Kersel DA
        • Havill JH
        • Sleigh JW.
        Caregiver burden at 1 year following severe traumatic brain injury.
        Brain Inj. 1998; 12: 1045-1059
        • Ponsford J
        • Olver J
        • Ponsford M
        • Nelms R.
        Long-term adjustment of families following traumatic brain injury where comprehensive rehabilitation has been provided.
        Brain Inj. 2003; 17: 453-468
        • Mazlan M
        • Ghani S
        • Tan KF
        • Subramanian P.
        Life satisfaction and strain among informal caregivers of patients with traumatic brain injury in Malaysia.
        Disabil Rehabil. 2016; 38: 2198-2205
        • Manskow US
        • Sigurdardottir S
        • Roe C
        • et al.
        Factors affecting caregiver burden 1 year after severe traumatic brain injury: a prospective nationwide multicenter study.
        J Head Trauma Rehab. 2015; 30: 411-423
        • Ergh TC
        • Hanks RA
        • Rapport LJ
        • Coleman RD.
        Social support moderates caregiver life satisfaction following traumatic brain injury.
        J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2003; 25: 1090-1101
        • Coleman RD
        • Rapport LJ
        • Ergh TC
        • Hanks RA
        • Ricker JH
        • Millis SR.
        Predictors of driving outcome after traumatic brain injury.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002; 83: 1415-1422
        • Sander AM
        • Maestas KL
        • Clark AN
        • Havins WN.
        Predictors of emotional distress in family caregivers of persons with traumatic brain injury: a systematic review.
        Review. Brain Impair. 2013; 14: 113-129
        • Page TA
        • Gordon S
        • Balchin R
        • Tomlinson M.
        Caregivers’ perspectives of the challenges faced with survivors of traumatic brain injury: a scoping review.
        NeuroRehabilitation. 2021; 49 ([Epub ahead of print]): 349-362
        • Hall KM
        • Karzmark P
        • Stevens M
        • Englander J
        • O'Hare P
        • Wright J
        Family stressors in traumatic brain injury: a two-year follow-up.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994; 75: 876-884
        • Kolakowsky-Hayner SA
        • Miner KD
        • Kreutzer JS.
        Long-term life quality and family needs after traumatic brain injury.
        J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2001; 16: 374-385
        • Kitter B
        • Sharman R.
        Caregivers’ support needs and factors promoting resiliency after brain injury.
        Brain Inj. 2015; 29: 1082-1093
        • Hammel J
        • Magasi S
        • Heinemann A
        • et al.
        Environmental barriers and supports to everyday participation: a qualitative insider perspective from people with disabilities.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015; 94: 578-588
        • Tulsky DS
        • Kisala PA
        • Lai JS
        • Carlozzi N
        • Hammel J
        • Heinemann AW.
        Developing an item bank to measure economic quality of life for individuals with disabilities.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015; 96: 604-613
        • Manns PJ
        • Chad KE.
        Components of quality of life for persons with a quadriplegic and paraplegic spinal cord injury.
        Qual Health Res. 2001; 11: 795-811
      1. CH Van Houtven, N Sperber and VA Smith, Short-term impacts of the VA caregiver support program on veterans and caregivers. Health Services Research. 2016 July 18. [Epub ahead of print].

        • Van Houtven CH
        • Friedemann-Sanches G
        • Clothier B
        • et al.
        Is policy well-targeted to remedy financial strain among caregivers of severely injured US service members?.
        Inquiry. 2012; 49: 339-351
      2. Johnson RW, LoSasso AT. The trade-off between hours of paid employment and time assistance to elderly parents at midlife. Available at: https://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/62491/409366-the-trade-off-between-hours-of-paid-employment-and-time-assistance-to-elderly-parents-at-midlife.pdf. Accessed August 29, 2022.

        • Skira M.
        Dynamic wage and employment effects of elder parent care.
        Int Econ Rev. 2015; 56: 63-93
        • Carlozzi NE
        • Boileau NR
        • Kallen MA
        • et al.
        Reliability and validity data to support the clinical utility of the Traumatic Brain Injury Caregiver Quality of Life (TBI-CareQOL).
        Rehabil Psychol. 2020; 656: 323-336
        • Carlozzi NE
        • Hanks R
        • Lange RT
        • et al.
        Understanding health-related quality of life in caregivers of civilians and service members/veterans with traumatic brain injury: establishing the reliability and validity of PROMIS mental health measures.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019; 100: S94-101
        • Carlozzi NE
        • Ianni PA
        • Lange RT
        • et al.
        Understanding health-related quality of life of caregivers of civilians and service members/veterans with traumatic brain injury: establishing the reliability and validity of PROMIS social health measures.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019; 100: S110-S118
        • Carlozzi NE
        • Ianni PA
        • Tulsky DS
        • et al.
        Understanding health-related quality of life in caregivers of civilians and service members/veterans with traumatic brain injury: establishing the reliability and validity of PROMIS Fatigue and Sleep Disturbance item banks.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019; 100: S102-S109
        • Carlozzi NE
        • Kallen MA
        • Hanks R
        • et al.
        The TBI-CareQOL measurement system: development and preliminary validation of health-related quality of life measures for caregivers of civilians and service members/veterans with traumatic brain injury.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019; 100: S1-12
        • Carlozzi NE
        • Kallen MA
        • Hanks R
        • et al.
        The development of a new computer adaptive test to evaluate feelings of being trapped in caregivers of individuals with traumatic brain injury: TBI-CareQOL Feeling Trapped item bank.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019; 100: S43-S51
        • Carlozzi NE
        • Kallen MA
        • Ianni PA
        • et al.
        The development of a new computer-adaptive test to evaluate strain in caregivers of individuals with TBI: TBI-CareQOL caregiver strain.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019; 100: S13-S21
        • Carlozzi NE
        • Kallen MA
        • Ianni PA
        • et al.
        The development of two new computer adaptive tests to evaluate feelings of loss in caregivers of individuals with traumatic brain injury: TBI-CareQOL feelings of loss-self and feelings of loss-person with traumatic brain injury.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019; 100: S31-S42
        • Carlozzi NE
        • Lange RT
        • Boileau NR
        • et al.
        TBI-CareQOL family disruption: family disruption in caregivers of persons with TBI.
        Rehabil Psychol. 2020; 65: 390-400
        • Carlozzi NE
        • Lange RT
        • French LM
        • et al.
        TBI-CareQOL military health care frustration in caregivers of service members/veterans with traumatic brain injury.
        Rehabil Psychol. 2020; 65: 360-376
        • Carlozzi NE
        • Lange RT
        • French LM
        • et al.
        Understanding health-related quality of life in caregivers of civilians and service members/veterans with TBI: reliability and validity data for the TBI-CareQOL measurement system.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019; 100: S85-S93
        • Carlozzi NE
        • Lange RT
        • Kallen MA
        • et al.
        Assessing vigilance in caregivers after traumatic brain injury: TBI-CareQOL caregiver vigilance.
        Rehabil Psychol. 2020; 65: 418-431
        • Bergmark BA
        • Winograd CH
        • Koopman C.
        Residence and quality of life determinants for adults with tetraplegia of traumatic spinal cord injury etiology.
        Spinal Cord. 2008; 46: 684-689
        • Hedberg L
        • Skarsater I.
        The importance of health for persons with psychiatric disabilities.
        J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2009; 16: 455-461
        • Cook S
        • Chambers E.
        What helps and hinders people with psychotic conditions doing what they want in their daily lives.
        Br J Occup Ther. 2009; 72: 238-248
        • Heinemann AW
        • Magasi S
        • Hammel J
        • et al.
        Environmental factors item development for persons with stroke, traumatic brain injury and spinal cord injury.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015; 96: 589-595
        • White NH
        • Black NH
        Spinal cord injury facts and figures at a glance. National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center, Facts and Figures at a Glance Birmingham.
        AL: Univ Ala Birm. 2017; 37: 355-356
        • McCarthy ML
        • Silberstein CE
        • Atkins EA
        • Harryman SE
        • Sponseller PD
        • Hadley-Miller NA.
        Comparing reliability and validity of pediatric instruments for measuring health and well-being of children with spastic cerebral palsy.
        Dev Med Child Neurol. 2002; 44: 468-476
        • Sherer M
        • Nick TG
        • Sander AM
        • et al.
        Groupings of persons with traumatic brain injury: a new approach to classifying traumatic brain injury in the post-acute period.
        J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2017; 32: 125-133
        • Campbell DT
        • Fiske DW.
        Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.
        London, UK: Psychol Bull. 1959; 56: 81-105
        • Heaton RK
        • Taylor JT
        • Grant I.
        Revised comprehensive norms for an expanded Halstead-Reitan Battery: demographically adjusted neuropsychological norms for African American and Caucasian adults. Psychological Assessment Resources, Lutz, FL2004
        • Ma VY
        • Chan L
        • Carruthers KJ.
        Incidence, prevalence, costs, and impact on disability of common conditions requiring rehabilitation in the United States: stroke, spinal cord injury, traumatic brain injury, multiple sclerosis, osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, limb loss, and back pain.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014; 95 (e1): 986-995
        • Hanauer DA
        • Mei Q
        • Law J
        • Khanna R
        • Zheng K.
        Supporting information retrieval from electronic health records: a report of University of Michigan's nine-year experience in developing and using the Electronic Medical Record Search Engine (EMERSE).
        J Biomed Inform. 2015; 55: 290-300
        • Corrigan JD
        • Cuthbert JP
        • Whiteneck GG
        • et al.
        Representativeness of the Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems National Database.
        J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2012; 27: 391-403
      3. Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center. DoD worldwide numbers for TBI. Available at: http://dvbic.dcoe.mil/dod-worldwide-numbers-tbi. Accessed February 10, 2017.

        • Kisala PA
        • Boulton AJ
        • Cohen ML
        • et al.
        Interviewer- versus self-administration of PROMIS(R) measures for adults with traumatic injury.
        Health Psychol. 2019; 38: 435-444
        • Carlozzi NE
        • Kallen MA
        • Sander AM
        • et al.
        The development of a new computer adaptive test to evaluate anxiety in caregivers of individuals with traumatic brain injury: TBI-CareQOL caregiver-specific anxiety.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019; 100: S22-S30
        • Cella D
        • Riley W
        • Stone A
        • et al.
        The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested in its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005-2008.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 2010; 63: 1179-1194
        • Cella D
        • Lai JS
        • Nowinski C
        • et al.
        Neuro-QOL brief measures of health-related quality of life for clinical research in neurology.
        Neurology. 2012; 78: 1860-1867
        • Gershon RC
        • Lai J
        • Bode R
        • et al.
        Neuro-QOL: quality of life item banks for adults with neurological disorders: item development and calibrations based upon clinical and general population testing.
        Qual Life Res. 2012; 21: 475-486
        • Bulmer MG.
        Principles of statistics. Dover Publications, New York1979
        • DeVellis R.
        Scale development: theory and applications.
        in: Applied social research methods series. 4th ed. Sage, London, UK2017
        • Cohen R.
        Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ1988
        • Andresen EM.
        Criteria for assessing the tools of disability outcomes research.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000; 81: S15-S20
        • Cramer D
        • Howitt DL.
        The Sage disctionary of statistics. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA2004
        • Tulsky DS
        • Kisala PA
        • Victorson D
        • et al.
        TBI-QOL: development and calibration of item banks to measure patient reported outcomes following traumatic brain injury.
        J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2016; 31: 40-51
        • Terwee CB
        • Bot SD
        • de Boer MR
        • et al.
        Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 2007; 60: 34-42
        • Didsbury MS
        • Kim S
        • Medway MM
        • et al.
        Socio-economic status and quality of life in children with chronic disease: a systematic review.
        J Paediatr Child Health. 2016; 52: 1062-1069
        • Tribius S
        • Meyer MS
        • Pflug C
        • et al.
        Socioeconomic status and quality of life in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer.
        Strahlenther Onkol. 2018; 194: 737-749
        • Roick J
        • Danker H
        • Kersting A
        • et al.
        The association of socioeconomic status with quality of life in cancer patients over a 6-month period using individual growth models.
        Support Care Cancer. 2019; 27: 3347-3355