Advertisement

Accelerating the Implementation of Evidence-Based Practice in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Published:December 25, 2021DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2021.03.045

      Abstract

      Over the past 3 decades, a substantial number of studies were published with the purpose of improving the effectiveness and efficiency of rehabilitation clinical practice. Clinicians and researchers face considerable challenges in successfully implementing these research findings into routine clinical practice. Knowledge translation includes the synthesis, dissemination, exchange, and ethically sound application of knowledge to improve health, provide more effective health services and products, and strengthen the health care system. An aim of knowledge translation research is to identify strategies to accelerate implementation of evidence into practice. A recent citation analysis on a commonly used knowledge translation framework, the Knowledge-to-Action Framework, identified implementation activities performed in physical medicine and rehabilitation. Although this citation analysis describes activities performed and outcomes assessed while conducting knowledge translation projects, successful knowledge translation also requires a robust social and physical infrastructure. In this commentary, we offer several observations that appear related to the increased likelihood of implementation success. Funders, higher education institutions, health care payers, and health care organizations contribute to successful implementation and must embrace their roles in implementation. Administrators, clinicians, and consumers of physical medicine and rehabilitation also have essential roles in knowledge translation.

      Keywords

      List of abbreviations:

      EBP (evidence-based practice), KT (knowledge translation), PM&R (physical medicine and rehabilitation)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Morris ZS
        • Wooding S
        • Grant J.
        The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research.
        J R Soc Med. 2011; 104: 510-520
        • Colquhoun HL
        • Lamontagne ME
        • Duncan EA
        • Fiander M
        • Champagne C
        • Grimshaw JM.
        A systematic review of interventions to increase the use of standardized outcome measures by rehabilitation professionals.
        Clin Rehabil. 2017; 31: 299-309
        • Jones CA
        • Roop SC
        • Pohar SL
        • Albrecht L
        • Scott SD.
        Translating knowledge in rehabilitation: systematic review.
        Phys Ther. 2015; 95: 663-677
        • Straus S
        • Tetroe J
        • Graham I.
        Knowledge translation in health care: moving from evidence to practice.
        2nd ed. BMJ Books, West Sussex, UK2013
        • Montpetit-Tourangeau K
        • Kairy D
        • Ahmed S
        • et al.
        A strategic initiative to facilitate knowledge translation research in rehabilitation.
        BMC Health Serv Res. 2020; 20: 973
        • Moore JL
        • Mbalilaki JA
        • Graham ID
        Knowledge translation in physical medicine and rehabilitation: a citation analysis of the Knowledge-to-Action literature.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021 Feb 6; ([Epub ahead of print])
        • Moore JL
        • Nordvik JE
        • Erichsen A
        • Rosseland I
        • Bo E
        • Hornby TG.
        Implementation of high-intensity stepping training during inpatient stroke rehabilitation improves functional outcomes.
        Stroke. 2020; 51: 563-570
        • Moore JL
        • Carpenter J
        • Doyle AM
        • et al.
        Development, implementation, and use of a process to promote knowledge translation in rehabilitation.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018; 99: 82-90
        • Moore JL
        • Virva R
        • Henderson C
        • et al.
        Applying the Knowledge-to-Action Framework to implement gait and balance assessments in inpatient stroke rehabilitation.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020 Nov 27; ([Epub ahead of print])
        • Hornby TG
        • Holleran CL
        • Leddy AL
        • et al.
        Feasibility of focused stepping practice during inpatient rehabilitation poststroke and potential contributions to mobility outcomes.
        Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2015; 29: 923-932
        • Montini T
        • Graham ID.
        Entrenched practices and other biases": unpacking the historical, economic, professional, and social resistance to de-implementation.
        Implement Sci. 2015; 10: 24
        • Harrison MB
        • Graham ID
        • Lorimer K
        • Friedberg E
        • Pierscianowski T
        • Brandys T.
        Leg-ulcer care in the community, before and after implementation of an evidence-based service.
        CMAJ. 2005; 172: 1447-1452
        • Salbach NM
        • Wood-Dauphinee S
        • Desrosiers J
        • et al.
        Facilitated interprofessional implementation of a physical rehabilitation guideline for stroke in inpatient settings: process evaluation of a cluster randomized trial.
        Implement Sci. 2017; 12: 100
        • Camden C
        • Shikako-Thomas K
        • Nguyen T
        • et al.
        Engaging stakeholders in rehabilitation research: a scoping review of strategies used in partnerships and evaluation of impacts.
        Disabil Rehabil. 2015; 37: 1390-1400
      1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research. Knowledge user engagement. Available at: https://cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/49505.html. Accessed February 11, 2021.

        • Blase K
        • Fixsen DL.
        Core intervention components: identifying and operationalizing what makes programs work.
        U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2013
        • Jull JE
        • Davidson L
        • Dungan R
        • Nguyen T
        • Woodward KP
        • Graham ID.
        A review and synthesis of frameworks for engagement in health research to identify concepts of knowledge user engagement.
        BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019; 19: 211
        • Aarons GA
        • Ehrhart MG
        • Farahnak LR
        • Sklar M.
        Aligning leadership across systems and organizations to develop a strategic climate for evidence-based practice implementation.
        Annu Rev Public Health. 2014; 35: 255-274
        • Gifford WA
        • Squires JE
        • Angus DE
        • et al.
        Managerial leadership for research use in nursing and allied health care professions: a systematic review.
        Implement Sci. 2018; 13: 127
        • McLean RKD
        • Graham ID
        • Tetroe JM
        • Volmink JA.
        Translating research into action: an international study of the role of research funders.
        Health Res Policy Syst. 2018; 16: 44
        • Kothari A
        • McCutcheon C
        • Graham ID.
        Defining integrated knowledge translation and moving forward: a response to recent commentaries.
        Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017; 6: 299-300
        • Kothari A
        • Wathen CN.
        Integrated knowledge translation: digging deeper, moving forward.
        J Epidemiol Community Health. 2017; 71: 619-623
        • Graham ID
        • Kothari A
        • McCutcheon C.
        Moving knowledge into action for more effective practice, programmes and policy: protocol for a research programme on integrated knowledge translation.
        Implement Sci. 2018; 13: 22
        • Moore JL
        • Potter K
        • Blankshain K
        • Kaplan SL
        • O'Dwyer LC
        • Sullivan JE
        A core set of outcome measures for adults with neurologic conditions undergoing rehabilitation: a clinical practice guideline.
        J Neurol Phys Ther. 2018; 42: 174-220
        • Glegg SM
        • Hoens A.
        Role domains of knowledge brokering: a model for the health care setting.
        J Neurol Phys Ther. 2016; 40: 115-123
        • Dogherty EJ
        • Harrison MB
        • Graham ID.
        Facilitation as a role and process in achieving evidence-based practice in nursing: a focused review of concept and meaning.
        Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2010; 7: 76-89
        • Tilson JK
        • Mickan S.
        Promoting physical therapists' use of research evidence to inform clinical practice: part 1–theoretical foundation, evidence, and description of the PEAK program.
        BMC Med Educ. 2014; 14: 125
        • Légaré F
        • Adekpedjou R
        • Stacey D
        • et al.
        Interventions for increasing the use of shared decision making by healthcare professionals.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018; 7CD006732
        • Williams MW
        • Rapport LJ
        • Hanks RA
        • Parker HA.
        Engagement in rehabilitation therapy and functional outcomes among individuals with acquired brain injuries.
        Disabil Rehabil. 2021; 43: 33-41