Advertisement

Facial Disability Index in Adults With Peripheral Facial Palsy: Rasch Analysis and Suggestions for Refinement

Published:December 10, 2021DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2021.10.030

      Abstract

      Objective

      To investigate the psychometric properties of the validated Italian version of the Facial Disability Index (FDI), a patient-reported outcome measure widely used to assess individuals with peripheral facial palsy.

      Design

      Methodological research on cross-sectional data from a convenience sample.

      Setting

      Outpatient university rehabilitation clinic.

      Participants

      A total of 168 (N=168) outpatients (66% female; mean age, 44±15 years) with peripheral facial palsy of diverse etiology (48% postsurgical, 31% Bell palsy, 8% posttraumatic, 3% congenital, 11% other medical conditions) and severity at the first visit.

      Interventions

      Not applicable.

      Main Outcome Measures

      The 2 FDI subscales, physical function (FDI-PHY) and social/well-being function (FDI-SWB), were separately analyzed using classical test theory methods and Rasch analysis.

      Results

      Cronbach α was 0.79 in FDI-PHY and 0.74 in FDI-SWB, while item-rest correlation ranged from 0.36-0.67 in FDI-PHY and from 0.43-0.68 in FDI-SWB. In the FDI-PHY, we deleted 2 underused response categories, rescoring the remaining ones. In the FDI-SWB, some response categories did not function as expected by the Rasch model: their collapse into a 4-level format solved this problem. In each subscale, all items fitted the Rasch model except item 4 (eye tearing/becoming dry) in FDI-PHY that showed an unexpectedly high response variability. The person separation reliability of both subscales indicated that they are useful only for group-level judgments. In both subscales, principal component analysis of the residuals showed unidimensionality and absence of locally dependent items. No significant differential item functioning concerning sex, age, or time from paralysis emerged.

      Conclusions

      Our study demonstrated overall positive psychometric characteristics of FDI except for the functioning of the response categories. We propose a refined version with 4 response categories only and related conversion graphs that may improve the interpretability, feasibility, and metric performance of this tool.

      Keywords

      List of abbreviations:

      CTT (classical test theory), FDI (Facial Disability Index), PHY (physical), SWB (social/well-being)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • de Swart BJ
        • Verheij JC
        • Beurskens CH.
        Problems with eating and drinking in patients with unilateral peripheral facial paralysis.
        Dysphagia. 2003; 18: 267-273
        • Walker DT
        • Hallam MJ
        • Ni Mhurchadha S
        • McCabe P
        • Nduka C
        The psychosocial impact of facial palsy: our experience in one hundred and twenty six patients.
        Clin Otolaryngol. 2012; 37: 474-477
        • Togni R
        • Abbamonte M
        • Comelli M
        • et al.
        Personality traits and perception of disability after facial palsy.
        J Psychol Psychother. 2016; 6: 276
        • Ho AL
        • Scott AM
        • Klassen AF
        • Cano SJ
        • Pusic AL
        • Van Laeken N.
        Measuring quality of life and patient satisfaction in facial paralysis patients: a systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012; 130: 91-99
        • Fattah AY
        • Gavilan J
        • Hadlock TA
        • et al.
        Survey of methods of facial palsy documentation in use by members of the Sir Charles Bell Society.
        Laryngoscope. 2014; 124: 2247-2251
        • Norris JH
        • Longmire NM
        • Kilcoyne S
        • Johnson D
        • Fitzpatrick R
        • Klassen AF.
        Exploring patient experience of facial nerve palsy to inform the development of a PROM.
        Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019; 7: e2072
        • Fu L
        • Bundy C
        • Sadiq SA.
        Psychological distress in people with disfigurement from facial palsy.
        Eye (Lond). 2011; 25: 1322-1326
        • Volk GF
        • Granitzka T
        • Kreysa H
        • Klingner CM
        Guntinas-Lichius O. Initial severity of motor and non-motor disabilities in patients with facial palsy: an assessment using patient-reported outcome measures.
        Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017; 274: 45-52
        • Diaz-Aristizabal U
        • Valdes-Vilches M
        • Fernandez-Ferreras TR
        • Calero-Muñoz E
        • Bienzobas-Allué E
        • Moracén-Naranjo T.
        Correlations between impairment, psychological distress, disability, and quality of life in peripheral facial palsy.
        Neurologia. 2019; 34: 423-428
        • VanSwearingen JM
        • Brach JS.
        The Facial Disability Index: reliability and validity of a disability assessment instrument for disorders of the facial neuromuscular system.
        Phys Ther. 1996; 76: 1288-1298
        • Kahn JB
        • Gliklich RE
        • Boyev KP
        • Stewart MG
        • Metson RB
        • McKenna MJ.
        Validation of a patient-graded instrument for facial nerve paralysis: the FaCE scale.
        Laryngoscope. 2001; 111: 387-398
        • Gonzalez-Cardero E
        • Infante-Cossio P
        • Cayuela A
        • Acosta-Feria M
        • Gutierrez-Perez JL.
        Facial Disability Index (FDI): adaptation to Spanish, reliability and validity.
        Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2012; 17: e1006-e1012
        • Pavese C
        • Cecini M
        • Camerino N
        • et al.
        Functional and social limitations after facial palsy: expanded and independent validation of the Italian version of the Facial Disability Index.
        Phys Ther. 2014; 94: 1327-1336
        • Ozden F
        • Karaman ON
        • Tugay N
        • Savaş Ö
        • Sözen T
        • Üçüncü H.
        The reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Facial Disability Index.
        Disabil Rehabil. 2020 May 15; ([Epub ahead of print])
        • van Veen MM
        • Bruins TE
        • Artan M
        • et al.
        Health-related quality of life in facial palsy: translation and validation of the Dutch version Facial Disability Index.
        Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020; 18: 256
        • Bond TG
        • Fox CM.
        Applying the Rasch model – fundamental measurement in the human sciences.
        3rd ed. Routledge, New York2015
        • Tesio L.
        Measuring behaviours and perceptions: Rasch analysis as a tool for rehabilitation research.
        J Rehabil Med. 2003; 35: 105-115
        • Pavese C
        • Cecini M
        • Caspani P
        • Monteleone S
        • Klersy C
        • Dalla Toffola E.
        Activity limitations and participation restrictions in patients with peripheral facial palsy: a cross-sectional study over a 6-year period.
        Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2020; 56: 725-732
        • Pavese C
        • Tinelli C
        • Furini F
        • et al.
        Validation of the Italian version of the Sunnybrook Facial Grading System.
        Neurol Sci. 2013; 34: 457-463
        • Bland JM
        • Altman DG.
        Cronbach's alpha.
        BMJ. 1997; 314: 572
        • Marsk E
        • Hammarstedt-Nordenvall L
        • Engstrom M
        • Jonsson L
        • Hultcrantz M.
        Validation of a Swedish version of the Facial Disability Index (FDI) and the Facial Clinimetric Evaluation (FaCE) scale.
        Acta Otolaryngol. 2013; 133: 662-669
        • Volk GF
        • Steigerwald F
        • Vitek P
        • Finkensieper M
        • Kreysa H
        Guntinas-Lichius O. Facial Disability Index and Facial Clinimetric Evaluation Scale: validation of the German versions.
        Laryngorhinootologie. 2015; 94: 163-168
        • Barry P
        • Mancini J
        • Alshukry A
        • Salburgo F
        • Lavieille JP
        • Montava M.
        Validation of French versions of the Facial Disability Index and the Facial Clinimetric Evaluation Scale, specific quality of life scales for peripheral facial palsy patients.
        Clin Otolaryngol. 2019; 44: 313-322
        • Streiner DL
        • Norman GR
        • Cairney J.
        Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use.
        5th ed. Oxford University Press, Oxford2015
        • Linacre JM.
        Optimizing rating scale category effectiveness.
        J Appl Meas. 2002; 3: 85-106
        • VanSwearingen JM
        • Brach JS.
        Author response.
        Phys Ther. 1996; 76: 1300
        • Linacre JM.
        Dichotomous equivalents to rating scales.
        Rasch Meas Trans. 2006; 20: 1052
        • Wolfe EW
        • Smith Jr., EV
        Instrument development tools and activities for measure validation using Rasch models: part II–validation activities.
        J Appl Meas. 2007; 8: 204-234
        • Finsterer J.
        Management of peripheral facial nerve palsy.
        Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2008; 265: 743-752
        • Cattaneo L
        • Pavesi G.
        The facial motor system.
        Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2014; 38: 135-159
        • Dalla Toffola E
        • Pavese C
        • Cecini M
        • et al.
        Hypoglossal-facial nerve anastomosis and rehabilitation in patients with complete facial palsy: cohort study of 30 patients followed up for three years.
        Funct Neurol. 2014; 29: 183-187
        • Pavese C
        • Cecini M
        • Lozza A
        • et al.
        Rehabilitation and functional recovery after masseteric-facial nerve anastomosis.
        Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2016; 52: 379-388
      1. Linacre JM. A user's guide to Winsteps Ministep. Available at: https://www.winsteps.com/a/Winsteps-Manual.pdf. Accessed December 12, 2020.

        • Mehta RP
        • Wernick-Robinson M
        • Hadlock TA.
        Validation of the Synkinesis Assessment Questionnaire.
        Laryngoscope. 2007; 117: 923-926
        • Hamour AF
        • Mendez AI
        • Biron VL
        • et al.
        Development of the Alberta facial clinical evaluation scale: a patient-centred outcomes instrument for facial nerve paralysis.
        Clin Otolaryngol. 2019; 44: 919-926
        • Graciano AJ
        • Bonin MM
        • Mory MR
        • Tessitore A
        • Paschoal JR
        • Chone CT.
        Translation, cultural adaptation and validation of the Facial Disability Index into Brazilian Portuguese.
        Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2020; 86: 602-608
        • Merbitz C
        • Morris J
        • Grip JC
        Ordinal scales and foundations of misinference.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1989; 70: 308-312
        • Grimby G
        • Tennant A
        • Tesio L.
        The use of raw scores from ordinal scales: time to end malpractice?.
        J Rehabil Med. 2012; 44: 97-98
        • Tennant A
        • McKenna SP
        • Hagell P.
        Application of Rasch analysis in the development and application of quality of life instruments.
        Value Health. 2004; 7: S22-S26
        • Stratford PW.
        Invited commentary.
        Phys Ther. 1996; 76: 1298-1299