Advertisement

Skilled Nursing and Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility Use by Medicare Fee-for-Service Beneficiaries Discharged Home After a Stroke: Findings From the COMPASS Trial

Published:November 02, 2021DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2021.10.015

      Abstract

      Objectives

      To examine the effect of a comprehensive transitional care model on the use of skilled nursing facility (SNF) and inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) care in the 12 months after acute care discharge home following stroke; and to identify predictors of experiencing a SNF or IRF admission following discharge home after stroke.

      Design

      Cluster randomized pragmatic trial

      Setting

      Forty-one acute care hospitals in North Carolina.

      Participants

      2262 Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries with transient ischemic attack or stroke discharged home. The sample was 80.3% White and 52.1% female, with a mean (SD) age of 74.9 (10.2) years and a mean ± SD National Institutes of Health stroke scale score of 2.3 (3.7).

      Intervention

      Comprehensive transitional care model (COMPASS-TC), which consisted of a 2-day follow-up phone call from the postacute care coordinator and 14-day in-person visit with the postacute care coordinator and advanced practice provider.

      Main Outcome Measures

      Time to first SNF or IRF and SNF or IRF admission (yes/no) in the 12 months following discharge home. All analyses utilized multivariable mixed models including a hospital-specific random effect to account for the non-independence of measures within hospital. Intent to treat analyses using Cox proportional hazards regression assessed the effect of COMPASS-TC on time to SNF/IRF admission. Logistic regression was used to identify clinical and non-clinical predictors of SNF/IRF admission.

      Results

      Only 34% of patients in the intervention arm received COMPASS-TC per protocol. COMPASS-TC was not associated with a reduced hazard of a SNF/ IRF admission in the 12 months post-discharge (hazard ratio, 1.20, with a range of 0.95-1.52) compared to usual care. This estimate was robust to additional covariate adjustment (hazard ratio, 1.23) (0.93-1.64). Both clinical and non-clinical factors (ie, insurance, geography) were predictors of SNF/IRF use.

      Conclusions

      COMPASS-TC was not consistently incorporated into real-world clinical practice. The use of a comprehensive transitional care model for patients discharged home after stroke was not associated with SNF or IRF admissions in a 12-month follow-up period. Non-clinical factors predictive of SNF/IRF use suggest potential issues with access to this type of care.

      Keywords

      List of abbreviations:

      CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services), COMPASS (COMprehensive Post-Acute Stroke Services), COMPASS-TC (COMprehensive Post-Acute Stroke Services transitional care), FFS (fee-for-service), HbA1C (glycated hemoglobin), ICD-10 (International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision), IRF (inpatient rehabilitation facility), LOS (length of stay), NIHSS (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale), PAC (postacute care), PCORI (Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute), SNF (skilled nursing facility), TC (transitional care), TCM (transitional care management), TIA (transient ischemic attack), UC ( = usual care)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Reeves MJ
        • Hughes AK
        • Woodward AT
        • et al.
        Improving transitions in acute stroke patients discharged to home: the Michigan stroke transitions trial (MISTT) protocol.
        BMC Neurol. 2017; 17: 115
        • Broderick JP
        • Abir M.
        Transitions of care for stroke patients: opportunities to improve outcomes.
        Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2015; 8: S190-S192
        • Adeoye O
        • Nystrom KV
        • Yavagal DR
        • et al.
        Recommendations for the establishment of stroke systems of care: a 2019 update.
        Stroke. 2019; 50: e187-e210
        • Kilkenny MF
        • Dalli LL
        • Kim J
        • et al.
        Factors associated with 90-day readmission after stroke or transient ischemic attack: linked data from the Australian Stroke Clinical Registry.
        Stroke. 2020; 51: 571-578
        • Virani SS
        • Alonso A
        • Benjamin EJ
        • et al.
        Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2020 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association.
        Circulation. 2020; 141: e139-e596
        • Bernhardt J
        • Dewey H
        • Thrift A
        • Donnan G.
        Inactive and alone: physical activity within the first 14 days of acute stroke unit care.
        Stroke. 2004; 35: 1005-1009
        • Tellier M
        • Rochette A
        Falling through the cracks: a literature review to understand the reality of mild stroke survivors.
        Top Stroke Rehabil. 2009; 16: 454-462
      1. Stroke Foundation. National stroke audit—rehabilitation services report. Available at: https://informme.org.au/-/media/42056DD67049480FACAE79440B440FEC.ashx?la=en. Accessed October 11, 2019.

        • Duncan PW
        • Bushnell CD
        • Jones SB
        • et al.
        Randomized pragmatic trial of stroke transitional care: the COMPASS study.
        Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020; 13e006285
        • Buntin MB.
        Access to postacute rehabilitation.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007; 88: 1488-1493
        • Freburger JK
        • Holmes GM
        • Ku LJ
        • Cutchin MP
        • Heatwole-Shank K
        • Edwards LJ.
        Disparities in postacute rehabilitation care for stroke: an analysis of the state inpatient databases.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011; 92: 1220-1229
        • Pindus DM
        • Mullis R
        • Lim L
        • et al.
        Stroke survivors' and informal caregivers' experiences of primary care and community healthcare services—a systematic review and meta-ethnography.
        PloS One. 2018; 13e0192533
        • Oyesanya TO
        • Loflin C
        • Byom L
        • et al.
        Transitions of care interventions to improve quality of life among patients hospitalized with acute conditions: a systematic literature review.
        Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021; 19: 36
        • Olson DM
        • Bettger JP
        • Alexander KP
        • et al.
        Transition of care for acute stroke and myocardial infarction patients: from hospitalization to rehabilitation, recovery, and secondary prevention.
        Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2011; : 1-197
        • Prvu Bettger J
        • Alexander KP
        • Dolor RJ
        • et al.
        Transitional care after hospitalization for acute stroke or myocardial infarction: a systematic review.
        Ann Intern Med. 2012; 157: 407-416
        • Langhorne P
        • Baylan S
        Early Supported Discharge Trialists. Early supported discharge services for people with acute stroke.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017; 7CD000443
        • Duncan PW
        • Bushnell CD
        • Rosamond WD
        • et al.
        The Comprehensive Post-Acute Stroke Services (COMPASS) study: design and methods for a cluster-randomized pragmatic trial.
        BMC Neurol. 2017; 17: 133
        • Bushnell CD
        • Duncan PW
        • Lycan SL
        • et al.
        A person-centered approach to poststroke care: The COMprehensive Post-Acute Stroke Services Model.
        J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018; 66: 1025-1030
        • Duncan PW
        • Abbott RM
        • Rushing S
        • et al.
        COMPASS-CP: An electronic application to capture patient-reported outcomes to develop actionable stroke and transient ischemic attack care plans.
        Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2018; 11e004444
        • Gesell SB
        • Bushnell CD
        • Jones SB
        • et al.
        Implementation of a billable transitional care model for stroke patients: the COMPASS study.
        BMC Health serv res. 2019; 19: 978
        • Lutz BJ
        • Reimold AE
        • Coleman SW
        • et al.
        implementation of a transitional care model for stroke: perspectives from frontline clinicians, administrators, and COMPASS-TC implementation staff.
        Gerontologist. 2020; 60: 1071-1084
        • Austin PC
        • Lee DS
        • Fine JP.
        Introduction to the analysis of survival data in the presence of competing risks.
        Circulation. 2016; 133: 601-609
        • Fine JP
        • Gray RJ.
        A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk.
        J Am Stat Assoc. 1999; 94: 14
        • Andrews JE
        • Moore JB
        • Weinberg RB
        • et al.
        Ensuring respect for persons in COMPASS: a cluster randomised pragmatic clinical trial.
        J Med Ethics. 2018; 44: 560-566
        • Rousseaux M
        • Daveluy W
        • Kozlowski R.
        Value and efficacy of early supported discharge from stroke units.
        Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2009; 52: 224-233
        • Larsen T
        • Olsen TS
        • Sorensen J.
        Early home-supported discharge of stroke patients: a health technology assessment.
        Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2006; 22: 313-320
        • Duncan PW
        • Bushnell C
        • Sissine M
        • et al.
        Comprehensive stroke care and outcomes: time for a paradigm shift.
        Stroke. 2021; 52: 385-393
        • Gregory PC
        • Han E.
        Disparities in postacute stroke rehabilitation disposition to acute inpatient rehabilitation vs. home: findings from the North Carolina Hospital Discharge Database.
        Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2009; 88: 100-107
      2. Medicare Payment Advisory Commission. Report to the Congress: Medicare Payment Policy. Available at: http://www.medpac.gov/docs/default-source/reports/mar19_medpac_entirereport_sec.pdf?sfvrsn=0. Accessed April 1, 2021.

      3. Medicare Payment Advisory Commission. Health Care Spending and the Medicare Program: A Data Book. Available at: http://www.medpac.gov/docs/default-source/data-book/jun18_databookentirereport_sec.pdf. Accessed April 1, 2021.

        • Rahman M
        • Tyler D
        • Thomas KS
        • Grabowski DC
        • Mor V.
        Higher Medicare SNF care utilization by dual-eligible beneficiaries: can Medicaid long-term care policies be the answer?.
        Health Serv Res. 2015; 50: 161-179
        • Kane RL
        • Wysocki A
        • Parashuram S
        • Shippee T
        • Lum T.
        Effect of long-term care use on Medicare and Medicaid expenditures for dual eligible and non-dual eligible elderly beneficiaries.
        Medicare Medicaid Res Rev. 2013; 3 (:mmrr.003.03.a05)
        • Nicholas LH.
        Better quality of care or healthier patients? Hospital utilization by Medicare Advantage and fee-for-service enrollees.
        Forum Health Econ Policy. 2013; 16: 137-161
        • Newhouse JP
        • Price M
        • McWilliams JM
        • Hsu J
        • McGuire TG.
        How much favorable selection is left in Medicare Advantage?.
        Am J Health Econ. 2015; 1: 1-26
        • Huckfeldt PJ
        • Escarce JJ
        • Rabideau B
        • Karaca-Mandic P
        • Sood N.
        Less intense postacute care, better outcomes for enrollees in medicare advantage than those in fee-for-service.
        Health Aff (Project Hope). 2017; 36: 91-100