Advertisement

Rasch Properties of the Cognitive and Linguistic Scale and Optimization for Outcome Trajectory Modeling in Pediatric Acquired Brain Injury

Published:October 30, 2021DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2021.10.009

      Abstract

      Objectives

      To (1) determine if items on the Cognitive and Linguistic Scale (CALS) follow a Rasch distribution and (2) explore the relationship between Rasch-derived Cognitive Ability Estimates and outcome trajectory parameters using a nonlinear mixed-effects modeling approach.

      Design

      Retrospective study.

      Setting

      Pediatric inpatient rehabilitation hospital.

      Participants

      A total of 252 children (N=252) aged of 2-21 years (median, 11.8 [IQR, 6.4-15.9] years) consecutively admitted to an inpatient rehabilitation brain injury unit (2008-2014) for a first inpatient admission after acquired brain injury.

      Interventions

      Not applicable.

      Main Outcome Measures

      Rasch-derived Cognitive Ability Estimates from the CALS and associated outcome trajectory parameters.

      Results

      The CALS demonstrates adequate interval-scale properties with removal of scores from the arousal and responsivity items. Rasch-derived Cognitive Ability Estimates were associated with age ( β=0.025, P<.001) such that older age was associated with a faster rate of recovery and more complete ultimate recovery. Slower recovery initiation was associated with a less complete overall cognitive recovery (Spearman ρ=−0.31; P<.001).

      Conclusions

      The Cognitive Ability Estimates derived from the CALS and associated outcome parameters (eg, rate of recovery) may serve as an ideal outcome measure for clinical trials evaluating interventions for acquired brain injury in a pediatric rehabilitation setting.

      Keywords

      List of abbreviations:

      ABI (acquired brain injury), CALS (Cognitive and Linguistic Scale), DOC (disorder of consciousness), PCM (Partial Credit Model), TBI (traumatic brain injury)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Slomine B
        • Eikenberg J
        • Salorio C
        • Suskauer S
        • Trovato M
        • Christensen J.
        Preliminary evaluation of the cognitive and linguistic scale: a measure to assess recovery in inpatient rehabilitation following pediatric brain injury.
        J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2008; 23: 286-293
        • Slomine BS
        • Grasmick PH
        • Suskauer SJ
        • Salorio CF.
        Psychometric properties of the cognitive and linguistic scale: a follow-up study.
        Rehabil Psychol. 2016; 61: 328-335
        • Randolph C.
        RBANS update: repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status manual.
        PsychCorp, Bloomington, MN2012
        • Hotz G
        • Helm-Estabrooks N
        • Nelson NW
        • Plante E.
        Pediatric Test of Brain Injury (PTBI).
        Paul H. Brooks Publishing Co, Baltimore2010
        • Blackwell LS
        • Shishido Y
        • Howarth R.
        Cognitive recovery of children and adolescents with moderate to severe TBI during inpatient rehabilitation [e-pub ahead of print].
        Disabil Rehabil. 2020 Jul 10. [Epub ahead of print];
        • Forsyth RJ.
        Efficient translational rehabilitation randomised controlled trial designs using disease progress modelling and trial simulation.
        Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2009; 19: 891-903
        • Forsyth RJ
        • Vu Thuy
        • Salorio C
        • Christensen J
        • Holford N.
        Review: efficient rehabilitation trial designs using disease progress modeling: a pediatric traumatic brain injury example.
        Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010; 24: 225-234
        • Kelly G
        • Mobbs S
        • Pritkin JN
        • et al.
        Gross Motor Function Measure-66 trajectories in children recovering after severe acquired brain injury.
        Dev Med Child Neurol. 2014; 57: 241-247
        • UDSMR
        The WeeFIM II clinical guide, version 6.0.
        UB Foundation Activities, Inc, Amherst2006
        • Msall ME
        • Tremont MR.
        Measuring functional status in children with genetic impairments.
        Am J Med Genet. 1999; 89: 62-74
        • Rizopoulos D.
        ltm: an R package for latent variable modeling.
        J Stat Softw. 2006; 17: 1-25
      1. Maier P, Hatzinger R, Maier MJ. eRm: extended Rasch modeling. 1.1-0. 2020.

      2. Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D, Team RC. nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1-151. Available at: https://cran.r-project.org/package=nlme. Accessed September 14, 2020.

        • Core Team R
        R: a language and environment for statistical computing.
        R Found Stat Comput. 2019;
        • Giacino JT
        • Whyte J
        • Bagiella E
        • et al.
        Placebo-controlled trial of amantadine for severe traumatic brain injury.
        N Engl J Med. 2012; 366: 819-826
        • Forsyth RJ
        • Salorio CF
        • Christensen JR.
        Modelling early recovery patterns after paediatric traumatic brain injury.
        Arch Dis Child. 2010; 95: 266-270
        • Kramer ME
        • Suskauer SJ
        • Christensen JR
        • et al.
        Examining acute rehabilitation outcomes for children with total functional dependence after traumatic brain injury.
        J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2013; 28: 361-370
        • Suskauer SJ
        • Slomine BS
        • Inscore AB
        • Lewelt AJ
        • Kirk JW
        • Salorio CF.
        Injury severity variables as predictors of WeeFIM scores in pediatric TBI: time to follow commands is best.
        J Pediatr Rehabil Med. 2009; 2: 297-307
        • Davis KC
        • Slomine BS
        • Salorio CF
        • Suskauer SJ.
        Time to follow commands and duration of posttraumatic amnesia predict GOS-E Peds scores 1 to 2 years after TBI in children requiring inpatient rehabilitation.
        J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2016; 31: E39-E47
        • Watson WD
        • Suskauer SJ
        • Askin G
        • et al.
        Cognitive recovery during inpatient rehabilitation following pediatric traumatic brain injury.
        J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2021; 36: 53-263
        • Anderson V
        • Spencer-Smith M
        • Wood A.
        Do children really recover better? Neurobehavioural plasticity after early brain insult.
        Brain. 2011; 134: 2197-2221
        • Giza CC
        • Prins ML.
        Is being plastic fantastic? Mechanisms of altered plasticity after developmental traumatic brain injury.
        Dev Neurosci. 2006; 28: 364-379
        • Zumsteg JM
        • Ennis SK
        • Jaffe KM
        • Mangione-Smith R
        • MacKenzie EJ
        • Rivara FP.
        Quality of care indicators for the structure and organization of inpatient rehabilitation care of children with traumatic brain injury.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012; 93: 386-393
        • Austin CA
        • Slomine BS
        • DeMatt EJ
        • Salorio CF
        • Suskauer SJ.
        Time to follow commands remains the most useful injury severity variable for predicting WeeFIM® scores 1 year after paediatric TBI.
        Brain Inj. 2013; 27: 1056-1062
        • Russell DJ
        • Avery LM
        • Rosenbaum PL
        • Lane M.
        Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM-66 & GMFM-88) user's manual.
        Mac Keith Press, London2002