Advertisement

Measurements of Best, Worst, and Average Socket Comfort Are More Reliable Than Current Socket Comfort in Established Lower Limb Prosthesis Users

Published:November 05, 2021DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2021.10.008

      Abstract

      Objective

      To evaluate test-retest reliability and related measurement properties of items developed to assess best, worst, and average prosthetic socket comfort.

      Design

      Methodological research to assess test-retest reliability of 4 individual socket comfort survey items. Socket comfort items were included in a self-report paper survey, which was administered to participants 2 to 3 days apart.

      Setting

      General community.

      Participants

      A minimum convenience sample of participants (N=63) was targeted for this study; 72 lower limb prosthesis users (>1y postamputation) completed the survey and were included in the final dataset.

      Interventions

      Not applicable.

      Main Outcome Measure

      The expanded socket comfort score (ESCS) was adapted from the original socket comfort score (SCS). The original SCS is a single-item self-report instrument developed to assess a lower limb prosthesis user's current socket comfort. Three additional items were designed to assess the user's best, worst, and average socket comfort over the previous 7 days.

      Results

      Best, worst, and average socket comfort items demonstrated better reliability, as indicated by higher intraclass correlation coefficients. As such, these items also exhibited lower measurement error and smaller minimal detectable change values than the item that measured current socket comfort. However, test-retest coefficients for all 4 ESCS items were below the level desired for evaluation of within-individual changes of socket comfort.

      Conclusions

      Items that assess best, worst, and average comfort provide a more stable measurement of socket fit than the existing SCS instrument. Although administration of all 4 ESCS items may provide more comprehensive assessment of a lower limb prosthesis user's socket fit, administrators should expect variations in scores over time owing to the variable nature of the underlying construct over time. Future research should examine whether the ESCS provides an improved overall assessment of socket fit.

      Keywords

      List of abbreviations:

      ESCS (expanded socket comfort score), ICC (intraclass correlation coefficients), SCS (socket comfort score)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Schaffalitzky E
        • Gallagher P
        • Maclachlan M
        • Wegener ST.
        Developing consensus on important factors associated with lower limb prosthetic prescription and use.
        Disabil Rehabil. 2012; 34: 2085-2094
        • Hanspal RS
        • Fisher K
        • Nieveen R.
        Prosthetic socket fit comfort score.
        Disabil Rehabil. 2003; 25: 1278-1280
        • Gailey R
        • Kristal A
        • Lucarevic J
        • Harris S
        • Applegate B
        • Gaunaurd I.
        The development and internal consistency of the comprehensive lower limb amputee socket survey in active lower limb amputees.
        Prosthet Orthot Int. 2018; 43: 80-87
        • Legro MW
        • Reiber GD
        • Smith DG
        • del Aguila M
        • Larsen J
        • Boone D.
        Prosthesis evaluation questionnaire for persons with lower limb amputations: assessing prosthesis-related quality of life.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998; 79: 931-938
        • Hafner BJ
        • Morgan SJ
        • Askew RL
        • Salem R.
        Psychometric evaluation of self-report outcome measures for prosthetic applications.
        J Rehabil Res Dev. 2016; 53: 797-812
        • Reeve BB
        • Wyrwich KW
        • Wu AW
        • et al.
        ISOQOL recommends minimum standards for patient-reported outcome measures used in patient-centered outcomes and comparative effectiveness research.
        Qual Life Res. 2013; 22: 1889-1905
        • Sanders JE
        • Youngblood RT
        • Hafner BJ
        • et al.
        Residual limb fluid volume change and volume accommodation: relationships to activity and self-report outcomes in people with trans-tibial amputation.
        Prosthet Orthot Int. 2018; 42: 415-427
        • Sanders JE
        • Allyn KJ
        • Harrison DS
        • Myers TR
        • Ciol MA
        • Tsai EC.
        Preliminary investigation of residual-limb fluid volume changes within one day.
        J Rehabil Res Dev. 2012; 49: 1467-1478
        • Jensen MP
        • Turner LR
        • Turner JA
        • Romano JM.
        The use of multiple-item scales for pain intensity measurement in chronic pain patients.
        Pain. 1996; 67: 35-40
        • Walter SD
        • Eliasziw M
        • Donner A.
        Sample size and optimal designs for reliability studies.
        Stat Med. 1998; 17: 101-110
        • Frost MH
        • Reeve BB
        • Liepa AM
        • Stauffer JW
        • Hays RD.
        What is sufficient evidence for the reliability and validity of patient-reported outcome measures?.
        Value Health. 2007; 10 (suppl): S94-105
        • Sanders JE
        • Fatone S.
        Residual limb volume change: systematic review of measurement and management.
        J Rehabil Res Dev. 2011; 48: 949-986
        • Marx RG
        • Menezes A
        • Horovitz L
        • Jones EC
        • Warren RF.
        A comparison of two time intervals for test-retest reliability of health status instruments.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 2003; 56: 730-735
      1. Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS). PROMIS instrument development and validation scientific standards, version 2.0. Revised May, 2013. Available at: http://www.healthmeasures.net/images/PROMIS/PROMISStandards_Vers2.0_Final.pdf. Accessed 1 July 2021.

        • Hafner BJ
        • Gaunaurd IA
        • Morgan SJ
        • Amtmann D
        • Salem R
        • Gailey RS.
        Construct validity of the Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility (PLUS-M) in adults with lower limb amputation.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017; 98: 277-285
        • Shrout PE
        • Fleiss JL.
        Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability.
        Psychol Bull. 1979; 86: 420-428
        • McLean JB
        • Redd CB
        • Larsen BG
        • et al.
        Socket size adjustments in people with transtibial amputation: effects on residual limb fluid volume and limb-socket distance.
        Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2019; 63: 161-171
        • Ziegler-Graham K
        • MacKenzie EJ
        • Ephraim PL
        • Travison TG
        • Brookmeyer R.
        Estimating the prevalence of limb loss in the United States: 2005 to 2050.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008; 89: 422-429