Advertisement
ORIGINAL RESEARCH| Volume 102, ISSUE 11, P2091-2101.e3, November 2021

Download started.

Ok

Traditional vs Extended Hybrid Cardiac Rehabilitation Based on the Continuous Care Model for Patients Who Have Undergone Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery in a Middle-Income Country: A Randomized Controlled Trial

      Abstract

      Objective

      To compare traditional (1-month supervised) vs hybrid cardiac rehabilitation (CR; usual care) with an additional 3 months offered remotely based on the continuous care model (intervention) in patients who have undergone coronary artery bypass graft (CABG).

      Design

      Randomized controlled trial, with blinded outcome assessment.

      Setting

      A major heart center in a middle-income country.

      Participants

      Of 107 eligible patients who were referred to CR during the period of study, 82.2% (N=88) were enrolled (target sample size). Participants were randomly assigned 1:1 (concealed; 44 per parallel arm). There was 92.0% retention.

      Interventions

      After CR, participants were given a mobile application and communicated biweekly with the nurse from months 1-4 to control risk factors.

      Main Outcome Measures

      Quality of life (QOL, Short Form-36, primary outcome); functional capacity (treadmill test); and the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale were evaluated pre-CR, after 1 month, and 3 months after CR (end of intervention), as well as rehospitalization.

      Results

      The analysis of variance interaction effects for the physical and mental component summary scores of QOL were <.001, favoring intervention (per protocol); there were also significant increases from pre-CR to 1 month, and from 1 month to the final assessment in the intervention arm (P<.001), with change in the control arm only to 1 month. The effect sizes were 0.115 and 0.248, respectively. Similarly, the interaction effect for functional capacity was significant (P<.001), with a clinically significant 1.5 metabolic equivalent of task increase in the intervention arm. There were trends for group effects for the psychosocial indicators, with paired t tests revealing significant increases in each at both assessment points in the intervention arm. At 4 months, there were 4 (10.3%) rehospitalizations in the control arm and none in intervention (P=.049). Intended theoretical mechanisms were also affected by the intervention.

      Conclusions

      Extending CR in this accessible manner, rendering it more comprehensive, was effective in improving outcomes.

      Keywords

      List of abbreviations:

      ANOVA (analysis of variance), CABG (coronary artery bypass graft), CCM (continuous care model), CR (cardiac rehabilitation), CVD (cardiovascular disease), LMIC (low‐ and middle‐income countries), MCS (mental component summary), PCS (physical component summary), QOL (quality of life)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Roth GA
        • Johnson C
        • Abajobir A
        • et al.
        Global, regional, and national burden of cardiovascular diseases for 10 causes, 1990 to 2015.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017; 70: 1-25
      1. World Health Organization. Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). Fact sheet. Available at: https://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cardiovascular-diseases-(cvds). Accesssed August 6, 2021.

        • Gaziano TA
        • Bitton A
        • Anand S
        • Abrahams-Gessel S
        • Murphy A.
        Growing epidemic of coronary heart disease in low- and middle-income countries.
        Curr Probl Cardiol. 2010; 35: 72-115
        • Turk-Adawi K
        • Sarrafzadegan N
        • Fadhil I
        • et al.
        Cardiovascular disease in the eastern Mediterranean region: epidemiology and risk factor burden.
        Nat Rev Cardiol. 2018; 15: 106-119
        • Deb S
        • Wijeysundera HC
        • Ko DT
        • Tsubota H
        • Hill S
        • Fremes SE.
        Coronary artery bypass graft surgery vs percutaneous interventions in coronary revascularization: a systematic review.
        JAMA. 2013; 310: 2086-2095
        • Anderson L
        • Oldridge N
        • Thompson DR
        • et al.
        Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease: Cochrane systematic review and Meta-Analysis.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016; 67: 1-12
        • Pesah E
        • Turk-Adawi K
        • Supervia M
        • et al.
        Cardiac rehabilitation delivery in low/middle-income countries.
        Heart. 2019; 105: 1806-1812
        • de Araújo Pio CS
        • Marzolini S
        • Pakosh M
        • Grace SL.
        Effect of cardiac rehabilitation dose on mortality and morbidity: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis.
        Mayo Clin Proc. 2017; 92: 1644-1659
        • Kabboul NN
        • Tomlinson G
        • Francis TA
        • et al.
        Comparative effectiveness of the core components of cardiac rehabilitation on mortality and morbidity: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
        J Clin Med. 2018; 7: 514
        • van Halewijn G
        • Deckers J
        • Tay HY
        • van Domburg R
        • Kotseva K
        • Wood D.
        Lessons from contemporary trials of cardiovascular prevention and rehabilitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Int J Cardiol. 2017; 232: 294-303
        • Frederix I
        • Hansen D
        • Coninx K
        • et al.
        Effect of comprehensive cardiac telerehabilitation on one-year cardiovascular rehospitalization rate, medical costs and quality of life: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
        Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2016; 23: 674-682
        • Thomas E
        • Gallagher R
        • Grace SL.
        Future-proofing cardiac rehabilitation: transitioning services to telehealth during COVID-19.
        Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2020 Apr 23; ([Epub ahead of print])
      2. Mamataz T, Uddin J, Ibn Alam S, Taylor R, Pakosh M, Grace SL. Effects of cardiac rehabilitation in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review and Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Prog Cardiovasc Dis; in press.

        • Babu AS
        • Maiya AG
        • George MM
        • Padmakumar R
        • Guddattu V.
        Effects of combined early in-patient cardiac rehabilitation and structured home-based program on function among patients with congestive heart failure: a randomized controlled trial.
        Heart views. 2011; 12: 99-103
        • Passaglia LG
        • Brant LCC
        • Nascimento BR
        • Ribeiro ALP.
        Impact of text messages in a middle-income country to promote secondary prevention after acute coronary syndrome (IMPACS): a randomized trial.
        Medicine (Baltimore). 2019; 98: e15681
        • Soleimani F
        • Anbohi SZ
        • Esmaeili R
        • Pourhoseingholi MA
        • Borhani F.
        Person-centered nursing to improve treatment regimen adherence in patients with myocardial infarction.
        J Clin Diagn Res. 2018; 12: 1-4
        • Lima A
        • Nascimentoa I
        • Martinsa T
        • Oliveira A
        • Nogueira T
        • Pereira D
        • Brittoa R.
        Analysis of adherence, effectiveness and cost of cardiac rehabilitation at home in a middle-income country: randomized clinical trial.
        Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil2020
        • Uddin J
        • Siraj M
        • Rashid MA
        • Rossau HK
        • Taylor RS
        • Zwisler AD.
        Effect of home-based cardiac rehabilitation in a lower-middle income country: results from a controlled trial.
        J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2020; 40: 29-34
        • Zhang L
        • Zhang L
        • Wang J
        • Ding F
        • Zhang S.
        Community health service center-based cardiac rehabilitation in patients with coronary heart disease: a prospective study.
        BMC Health Serv Res. 2017; 17: 128
        • Dehdari T
        • Heidarnia A
        • Ramezankhani A
        • Sadeghian S
        • Ghofranipour F.
        Effects of progressive muscular relaxation training on quality of life in anxious patients after coronary artery bypass graft surgery.
        Indian J Med Res. 2009; 129: 603-608
        • Chaves GS
        • Lima de Melo Ghisi G
        • Britto RR
        • Grace SL.
        Maintenance of gains, morbidity, and mortality at 1 year following cardiac rehabilitation in a middle-income country: a wait-list control crossover trial.
        J Am Heart Assoc. 2019; 8e011228
        • Jena S
        • Das S
        • Pradhan R.
        A comparative study between effects of aerobic exercises and conventional treatment on selected outcomes of heart failure clients.
        Int J Pharm Sci Rev Res. 2020; 11: 342-346
        • Eraballi A
        • Raghuram N
        • Ramarao NH
        • Pradhan B
        • Rao PV.
        Yoga based lifestyle program in improving quality of life after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a randomised controlled trial.
        J Clin Diagn Res. 2018; 12: 5-9
        • Dorje T
        • Zhao G
        • Tso K
        • et al.
        Smartphone and social media-based cardiac rehabilitation and secondary prevention in China (SMART-CR/SP): a parallel-group, single-blind, randomised controlled trial.
        Lancet Digit Health. 2019; 1: 363-374
        • Thombs BD
        • Bass EB
        • Ford DE
        • et al.
        Prevalence of depression in survivors of acute myocardial infarction.
        J Gen Intern Med. 2006; 21: 30-38
        • Ahmadi F.
        Design and evaluation of continuous care model in the management of patients with chronic coronary artery.
        Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran2001
        • Walters DL
        • Sarela A
        • Fairfull A
        • et al.
        A mobile phone-based care model for outpatient cardiac rehabilitation: the care assessment platform (CAP).
        BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2010; 10: 5
        • Devi R
        • Powell J
        • Singh S.
        A web-based program improves physical activity outcomes in a primary care angina population: randomized controlled trial.
        J Med Internet Res. 2014; 16: e186
        • Neubeck L
        • Lowres N
        • Benjamin EJ
        • Freedman SB
        • Coorey G
        • Redfern J.
        The mobile revolution—using smartphone apps to prevent cardiovascular disease.
        Nat Rev Cardiol. 2015; 12: 350-360
        • Piepoli MF
        • Hoes AW
        • Agewall S
        • et al.
        2016 European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: the sixth joint task force of the European Society of Cardiology and other societies on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (constituted by representatives of 10 societies and by invited experts) developed with the special contribution of the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation (EACPR).
        Eur Heart J. 2016; 37: 2315-2381
        • Taherzadeh G
        • Filippo DE
        • Kelly S
        • et al.
        Patient-reported outcomes in cardiac rehabilitation: what do we know about program statisfaction? A review.
        J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2016; 36: 230-239
        • Uijen AA
        • Heinst CW
        • Schellevis FG
        • et al.
        Measurement properties of questionnaires measuring continuity of care: a systematic review.
        PLoS One. 2012; 7: e42256
        • Riley DL
        • Stewart DE
        • Grace SL.
        Continuity of cardiac care: cardiac rehabilitation participation and other correlates.
        Int J Cardiol. 2007; 119: 326-333
        • Hadjistavropoulos HD
        • Biem HJ
        • Kowalyk KM.
        Measurement of continuity of care in cardiac patients: reliability and validity of an in-person questionnaire.
        Can J Cardiol. 2004; 20: 883-891
        • Cooper AF
        • Weinman J
        • Hankins M
        • Jackson G
        • Horne R.
        Assessing patients’ beliefs about cardiac rehabilitation as a basis for predicting attendance after acute myocardial infarction.
        Heart. 2007; 93: 53-58
        • Ware Jr, JE
        • Sherbourne CD.
        The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.
        Med Care. 1992; 30: 473-483
        • Ware J
        • Kosinski M
        • Keller S.
        SF-36 physical and mental health summary scales: a user’s manual.
        Health Assessment Lab. 5th ed. New England Medical Center, Boston1994
        • Antony MM
        • Bieling PJ
        • Cox BJ
        • Enns MW
        • Swinson RP.
        Psychometric properties of the 42-item and 21-item versions of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales in clinical groups and a community sample.
        Psychol Assess. 1998; 10: 176-181
      3. American Heart Association. Classes of heart failure. Available at: https://www.heart.org/en/health-topics/heart-failure/what-is-heart-failure/classes-of-heart-failure. Accessed December 22, 2018.

        • Hojskov IE
        • Moons P
        • Hansen NV
        • et al.
        Early physical training and psycho-educational intervention for patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. The SheppHeart randomized 2 x 2 factorial clinical pilot trial.
        Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2016; 15: 425-437
        • Pocock SJ.
        Clinical trials: a practical approach.
        John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken1990
        • Gravetter F
        • Wallnau L.
        Essentials of statistics for the behavioral sciences.
        Wadsworth, Cengage Learning, Belmont2013
        • Cohen J.
        Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences.
        2nd ed. Laurence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale1988
        • Stewart AL
        • Greenfield S
        • Hays RD
        • et al.
        Functional status and well-being of patients with chronic conditions: results from the Medical Outcomes Study.
        JAMA. 1989; 262: 907-913
        • Wyrwich KW
        • Tierney WM
        • Babu AN
        • Kroenke K
        • Wolinsky FD.
        A comparison of clinically important differences in health-related quality of life for patients with chronic lung disease, asthma, or heart disease.
        Health Serv Res. 2005; 40: 577-592
        • Warkentin LM
        • Majumdar SR
        • Johnson JA
        • et al.
        Weight loss required by the severely obese to achieve clinically important differences in health-related quality of life: two-year prospective cohort study.
        BMC Med. 2014; 12: 175
        • Myers J
        • Prakash M
        • Froelicher V
        • Do D
        • Partington S
        • Atwood JE.
        Exercise capacity and mortality among men referred for exercise testing.
        N Engl J Med. 2002; 346: 793-801
        • Moosavinasab M
        • Rahimi F
        • KhoshFetrat M
        • Zarchi AAK.
        A review of 17 years of application of a continuous care model on the consequences of acute and chronic diseases: describing and assessing the quality of methodology of papers.
        J Mil Med. 2018; 20: 27-55
        • Mojalli M
        • Khosrojerdi M
        • Mohammadpour A.
        Effect of a cardiac rehabilitation program training based on continues care model on empowerment and cardiovascular indices in patients with Ischemic Heart Disease (IHD).
        Horizon Med Sci. 2018; 24: 73-78
        • Najafi F
        • Nalini M.
        Hospital-based versus hybrid cardiac rehabilitation program in coronary bypass surgery patients in western Iran: effects on exercise capacity, risk factors, psychological factors, and quality of life.
        J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2015; 35: 29-36
        • Barker PM
        • Reid A
        • Schall MW.
        A framework for scaling up health interventions: lessons from large-scale improvement initiatives in Africa.
        Implement Sci. 2016; 11: 1-11
        • Grace SL
        • Turk-Adawi KI
        • Contractor A
        • et al.
        Cardiac rehabilitation delivery model for low-resource settings: an international council of cardiovascular prevention and rehabilitation consensus statement.
        Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2016; 59: 303-322
        • Turk-Adawi K
        • Supervia M
        • Lopez-Jimenez F
        • et al.
        Cardiac rehabilitation availability and density around the globe.
        EClinicalMedicine. 2019; 13: 31-45
        • Lima de Melo Ghisi G
        • Pesah E
        • Turk-Adawi K
        • Supervia M
        • Lopez Jimenez F
        • Grace SL
        Cardiac rehabilitation models around the globe.
        J Clin Med. 2018; 7: 260
        • Babu AS
        • Lopez-Jimenez F
        • Thomas RJ
        • et al.
        Advocacy for outpatient cardiac rehabilitation globally.
        BMC Health Serv Res. 2016; 16: 471