Characterizing the Experience of Spasticity after Spinal Cord Injury: A National Survey Project of the Spinal Cord Injury Model Systems Centers



      To characterize the qualities that individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) associate with their experience of spasticity and to describe the relationship between spasticity and perceived quality of life and the perceived value of spasticity management approaches.


      Online cross-sectional survey.


      Multicenter collaboration among 6 Spinal Cord Injury Model Systems hospitals in the United States.


      Individuals with SCI (N=1076).


      Not applicable.

      Main Outcome Measures

      Qualities of Spasticity Questionnaire, modified Spinal Cord Injury–Spasticity Evaluation Tool (mSCI-SET), and the modified Patient-Reported Impact of Spasticity Measure (mPRISM).


      Respondents indicated that spasms most often occurred in response to movement-related triggering events. However, spontaneous spasms (ie, no triggering event) were also reported to be among the most common types. Frequency of spasms appears to decline with age. The highest frequency of spasms was reported by 56% of respondents aged <25 years and by only 28% of those >55 years. Stiffness associated with spasticity was reported to be more common than spasms (legs, 65% vs 54%; trunk, 33% vs 18%; arms, 26% vs 15%). Respondents reported negative effects of spasticity more commonly than positive effects. Based on their association with negative scores on the mSCI-SET and the mPRISM, the 5 most problematic experiences reported were stiffness all day, interference with sleep, painful spasms, perceived link between spasticity and pain, and intensification of pain before a spasm. Respondents indicated spasticity was improved more by stretching (48%) and exercise (45%) than by antispasmodics (38%).


      The experience of spasticity after SCI is complex and multidimensional, with consequences that affect mobility, sleep, comfort, and quality of life. Stiffness, rather than spasms, appears to be the most problematic characteristic of spasticity. Physical therapeutic interventions to treat spasticity warrant in-depth investigation.


      List of abbreviations:

      mPRISM (modified Patient-Reported Impact of Spasticity Measure), mSCI-SET (modified Spinal Cord Injury–Spasticity Evaluation Tool), PRISM (Patient-Reported Impact of Spasticity Measure), QOL (quality of life), SCI (spinal cord injury), SCI-SET (Spinal Cord Injury-Spasticity Evaluation Tool)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Adams MM
        • Ginis KAM
        • Hicks AL.
        The spinal cord injury spasticity evaluation tool: development and evaluation.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007; 88: 1185-1192
        • Harvey LA
        • Glinsky JA
        • Katalinic OM
        • Ben M.
        Contracture management for people with spinal cord injuries.
        NeuroRehabilitation. 2011; 28: 17-20
        • Sköld C
        • Levi R
        • Seiger A.
        Spasticity after traumatic spinal cord injury: nature, severity, and location.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999; 80: 1548-1557
        • Maynard FM
        • Karunas RS
        • Waring WP.
        Epidemiology of spasticity following traumatic spinal cord injury.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1990; 71: 566-569
        • Levi R
        • Hultling C
        • Nash MS
        • Seiger A.
        The Stockholm spinal cord injury study: 1. Medical problems in a regional SCI population.
        Paraplegia. 1995; 33: 308-315
        • Hochberg LR
        • Serruya MD
        • Friehs GM
        • et al.
        Neuronal ensemble control of prosthetic devices by a human with tetraplegia.
        Nature. 2006; 442: 164-171
        • Johnson RL
        • Gerhart KA
        • McCray J
        • Menconi JC
        • Whiteneck GG.
        Secondary conditions following spinal cord injury in a population-based sample.
        Spinal Cord. 1998; 36: 45-50
        • Andresen SR
        • Biering-Sørensen F
        • Hagen EM
        • Nielsen JF
        • Bach FW
        • Finnerup NB.
        Pain, spasticity and quality of life in individuals with traumatic spinal cord injury in Denmark.
        Spinal Cord. 2016; 54: 973-979
        • Holtz KA
        • Lipson R
        • Noonan VK
        • Kwon BK
        • Mills PB.
        Prevalence and effect of problematic spasticity after traumatic spinal cord injury.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017; 98: 1132-1138
        • Chang E
        • Ghosh N
        • Yanni D
        • Lee S
        • Alexandru D
        • Mozaffar T.
        A review of spasticity treatments: pharmacological and interventional approaches.
        Crit Rev Phys Rehabil Med. 2013; 25: 11-22
        • Taricco M
        • Pagliacci MC
        • Telaro E
        • Adone R.
        Pharmacological interventions for spasticity following spinal cord injury: results of a Cochrane systematic review.
        Eura Medicophys. 2006; 42: 5-15
        • Montané E
        • Vallano A
        • Laporte JR.
        Oral antispastic drugs in nonprogressive neurologic diseases: a systematic review.
        Neurology. 2004; 63: 1357-1363
        • Lance J.
        Symposium synopsis.
        in: Feldman RG Young RR Koella WP Spasticity: disordered motor control. Year Book Medical Publishers, Chicago1980: 485
        • Fleuren JFM
        • Snoek GJ
        • Voerman GE
        • Hermens HJ.
        Muscle activation patterns of knee flexors and extensors during passive and active movement of the spastic lower limb in chronic stroke patients.
        J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2009; 19: e301-e310
        • McKay WB
        • Sweatman WM
        • Field-Fote EC.
        The experience of spasticity after spinal cord injury: perceived characteristics and impact on daily life.
        Spinal Cord. 2018; 56: 478-486
        • Pandyan AD
        • Gregoric M
        • Barnes MP
        • et al.
        Spasticity: clinical perceptions, neurological realities and meaningful measurement.
        Disabil Rehabil. 2005; 27: 2-6
        • Burns AS
        • Lanig I
        • Grabljevec K
        • et al.
        Optimizing the management of disabling spasticity following spinal cord damage: the ability network–an international initiative.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016; 97: 2222-2228
        • Priebe MM
        • Sherwood AM
        • Thornby JI
        • Kharas NF
        • Markowski J.
        Clinical assessment of spasticity in spinal cord injury: a multidimensional problem.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996; 77: 713-716
        • Sweatman WM
        • Heinemann AW
        • Furbish CL
        • Field-Fote EC.
        Modified PRISM and SCI-SET spasticity measures for persons with traumatic spinal cord injury: results of a Rasch Analyses.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020; 101: 1570-1579
        • Manella KJ
        • Torres J
        • Field-Fote EC.
        Restoration of walking function in an individual with chronic complete (AIS A) spinal cord injury.
        J Rehabil Med. 2010; 42: 795-798
        • Murillo N
        • Kumru H
        • Opisso E
        • et al.
        Recovery of assisted overground stepping in a patient with chronic motor complete spinal cord injury: a case report.
        NeuroRehabilitation. 2012; 31: 401-407
        • Spiess MR
        • Jaramillo JP
        • Behrman AL
        • Teraoka JK
        • Patten C.
        Unexpected recovery after robotic locomotor training at physiologic stepping speed: a single-case design.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012; 93: 1476-1484
        • Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation
        Standards for privacy of individually identifiable health information.
        U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, WashingtonDC2000
        • Krause JS
        • Zhai Y
        • Saunders LL
        • Carter RE.
        Risk of mortality after spinal cord injury: an 8-year prospective study.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009; 90: 1708-1715
        • Baunsgaard CB
        • Nissen UV.
        • Christensen KB
        • Biering-Sørensen F
        Modified Ashworth scale and spasm frequency score in spinal cord injury: reliability and correlation.
        Spinal Cord. 2016; 54: 702-708
        • Cook KF
        • Teal CR
        • Engebretson JC
        • et al.
        Development and validation of Patient Reported Impact of Spasticity Measure (PRISM).
        J Rehabil Res Dev. 2007; 44: 363-371
        • Balioussis C
        • Hitzig SL
        • Flett H
        • Noreau L
        • Craven BC.
        Identifying and classifying quality of life tools for assessing spasticity after spinal cord injury.
        Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2014; 20: 208-224
        • Dancey CP
        • Reidy J.
        Statistics without maths for psychology.
        Pearson Education, London, UK2011
        • Manella KJ
        • Field-Fote EC.
        Modulatory effects of locomotor training on extensor spasticity in individuals with motor-incomplete spinal cord injury.
        Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2013; 31: 633-646
        • Mayo M
        • DeForest BA
        • Castellanos M
        • Thomas CK.
        Characterization of involuntary contractions after spinal cord injury reveals associations between physiological and self-reported measures of spasticity.
        Front Integr Neurosci. 2017; 11: 2
        • Fleuren JF
        • Voerman GE
        • Snoek GJ
        • Nene AV.
        • Rietman JS
        • Hermens HJ.
        Perception of lower limb spasticity in patients with spinal cord injury.
        Spinal Cord. 2009; 47: 396-400
        • Tibbett J
        • Widerström-Noga EG
        • Thomas CK
        • Field-Fote EC.
        Impact of spasticity on transfers and activities of daily living in individuals with spinal cord injury.
        J Spinal Cord Med. 2019; 42: 318-327
        • Hsieh JTC
        • Wolfe DL
        • Miller WC
        • Curt A.
        Spasticity outcome measures in spinal cord injury: psychometric properties and clinical utility.
        Spinal Cord. 2008; 46: 86-95
        • Sangari S
        • Lundell H
        • Kirshblum S
        • Perez MA.
        Residual descending motor pathways influence spasticity after spinal cord injury.
        Ann Neurol. 2019; 86: 28-41
        • Noonan VK
        • Kopec JA
        • Zhang H
        • Dvorak MF.
        Impact of associated conditions resulting from spinal cord injury on health status and quality of life in people with traumatic central cord syndrome.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008; 89: 1074-1082
        • Westgren N
        • Levi R.
        Quality of life and traumatic spinal cord injury.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998; 79: 1433-1439
        • Adriaansen JJE
        • Ruijs LEM
        • Van Koppenhagen CF
        • et al.
        Secondary health conditions and quality of life in persons living with spinal cord injury for at least ten years.
        J Rehabil Med. 2016; 48: 853-860
        • Mahoney JS
        • Engebretson JC
        • Cook KF
        • Hart KA
        • Robinson-Whelen S
        • Sherwood AM.
        Spasticity experience domains in persons with spinal cord injury.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007; 88: 287-294
        • Estes SP
        • Iddings JA
        • Field-Fote EC.
        Priming neural circuits to modulate spinal reflex excitability.
        Front Neurol. 2017; 8: 17
        • DiPiro ND
        • Li C
        • Krause JS.
        A longitudinal study of self-reported spasticity among individuals with chronic spinal cord injury.
        Spinal Cord. 2018; 56: 218-225
      1. National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center (NSCISC). Facts and figures at a glance. Available at: and Figures 2020.pdf. Accessed April 1, 2020.