The article “Comparative Effectiveness of Orthoses for Thumb Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis” brings a new look to an essential question for physicians and therapists seeing clients with thumb osteoarthritis (CMC-OA). The authors aimed to answer a much-debated question of whether specific orthoses are better for individuals living with CMC-OA. After presenting a comprehensive analysis of randomized controlled trials published in the past 20 years, their results suggest that long orthoses are better suited to provide pain relief, whereas their short counterparts can substantially improve hand function.
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
One-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:Subscribe to Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
- Comparative effectiveness of orthoses for thumb osteoarthritis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020 Jul 12; ([Epub ahead of print])
- Usability of thenar eminence orthoses: report of a comparative study.Clin Rehabil. 1999; 13: 288-294
- Current practice patterns in conservative thumb CMC joint care: survey results.J Hand Ther. 2014; 27: 14-22
- Efficacy of non-surgical interventions for trapeziometacarpal (thumb base) osteoarthritis: a systematic review.Arthritis Care Res. 2019 Oct 10; ([Epub ahead of print])
- The immediate and short-term effects of a wrist extension orthosis on upper-extremity kinematics and range of shoulder motion.Am J Occup Ther. 2003; 57: 517-524
- Systematic review of design and effects of splints and exercise programs in hand osteoarthritis.Arthritis Care Res. 2011; 63: 834-848
Published online: October 29, 2020
© 2020 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine