The Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation has taken a number of steps over the years to improve the quality of its articles,
including mandatory use of reporting guidelines in 2014,
1
requiring a priori clinical trial registration in 2015,
2
and increasing abstract word counts in 2019.
3
The increasing number of systematic reviews (SRs) that Archives receives, reviews, and publishes highlights the need to promote openness in this
area as well.
4
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Archives of Physical Medicine and RehabilitationAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- Elevating the quality of disability and rehabilitation research: mandatory use of the reporting guidelines.Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014; 95: 415-417
- Clinical trial registration: the time has come.Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015; 96: 2093
- Archives seeks to improve abstract reporting quality.Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019; 100: 1990-1991
- Scientific standards. Promoting an open research culture.Science. 2015; 348: 1422-1425
- Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.PLoS Med. 2009; 6e1000097
- Finding what works in health care: standards for systematic reviews.The National Academies Press, Washington (DC)2011
- Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group.JAMA. 2000; 283: 2008-2012
- PROSPERO: international prospective register of systematic reviews.(Available at:)https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/Date accessed: August 15, 2020
- Open Science Framework (OSF).(Available at:)https://osf.io/Date accessed: August 29, 2020
- Is there a reproducibility crisis?.Nature. 2016; 533: 452-454
- Social science. Promoting transparency in social science research.Science. 2014; 343: 30-31
Article info
Publication history
Published online: September 24, 2020
Footnotes
Disclosures: Drs Heinemann, Chan, and Hoenig receive a stipend from ACRM for their editorial board leadership. The other author has nothing to disclose.
Identification
Copyright
© 2020 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine
