Abstract
Objectives
To describe the employment situation of individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI)
in 22 countries participating in the International Spinal Cord Injury community survey,
to compare observed and predicted employment rates, to estimate gaps in employment
rates among people with SCI compared with the general population, and to study differences
in employment between men and women.
Design
Cross-sectional survey.
Setting
Community.
Participants
People of employable age (N=9875; 18-64 y) with traumatic or non-traumatic SCI (including
cauda equina syndrome) who were at least 18 years of age at the time of the survey,
living in the community, and able to respond to one of the available language versions
of the questionnaire.
Interventions
Not applicable
Main Outcome Measures
The observed employment rate was defined as performing paid work for at least 1 hour
a week, and predicted employment rate was adjusted for sample composition from mixed
logistic regression analysis.
Results
A total of 9875 participants were included (165-1174 per country). Considerable differences
in sample composition were found. The observed worldwide employment rate was 38%.
A wide variation was found across countries, ranging from 10.3% to 61.4%. Some countries
showed substantially higher or lower employment rates than predicted based on the
composition of their sample. Gaps between the observed employment rates among participants
with SCI and the general population ranged from 14.8% to 54.8%. On average, employment
rates were slightly higher among men compared with women, but with large variation
across countries. Employment gaps, however, were smaller among women for most countries.
Conclusions
This first worldwide survey among people with SCI shows an average employment rate
of 38%. Differences between observed and predicted employment rates across countries
point at country-specific factors that warrant further investigation. Gaps with employment
rates in the general population were considerable and call for actions for more inclusive
labor market policies in most of the countries investigated.
Keywords
List of abbreviations:
InSCI (International Spinal Cord Injury community survey), SCI (spinal cord injury), TSI (time since onset of injury)To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Archives of Physical Medicine and RehabilitationAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- It's all of the above: benefits of working for individuals with spinal cord injury.Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2015; 21: 1-9
- The meaning of employment from the perspective of persons with spinal cord injuries in six European countries.Work. 2016; 5: 133-144
- Review of critical factors related to employment after spinal cord injury: implications for research and vocational services.J Spinal Cord Med. 2009; 32: 503-531
- Sickness, disability and work: breaking the barriers. A synthesis of findings across OECD countries.OECD Publications, Paris2010
- Employment status after spinal cord injury (1992-2005): a review with implications for interpretation, evaluation, further research, and clinical practice.Int J Rehabil Res. 2009; 32: 1-11
- Investigating employment following spinal cord injury: outcomes, methods, and population demographics.Disabil Rehabil. 2019; 41: 2359-2368
- Education and employment.in: Bickenbach J. Officer A. Shakespeare T. International perspectives on spinal cord injury. World Health Organization, Geneva2013: 167-194
- Modifiable and non-modifiable factors associated with employment outcomes following spinal cord injury: A systematic review.J Spinal Cord Med. 2015; 38: 422-431
- Gender, class, employment status and social mobility following spinal cord injury in Denmark, the Netherlands, Norway and Switzerland.Spinal Cord. 2019 Oct 1; ([Epub ahead of print])
- The International Spinal Cord Injury Survey and the learning health system for spinal cord injury.Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2017; 96: S2-S4
- Study protocol of the International Spinal Cord Injury (InSCI) Community Survey.Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2017; 96: S23-S34
- Cohort profile of the International Spinal Cord Injury (InSCI) Community Survey.Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020; (In this issue)
- A structured approach to capture the lived experience of spinal cord injury: data model and questionnaire of the International Spinal Cord Injury Community Survey.Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2017; 96: S5-S16
- Employment.(Available at:)https://ilostat.ilo.org/glossary/employment/Date accessed: October 23, 2019
- International standard classification of education (ISCED).UNESCO, Paris1997
- Employment of persons with spinal cord lesions injured more than 20 years ago.Disabil Rehabil. 2009; 31: 2174-2184
- Employment after spinal cord injury in Norway: a cross-sectional survey.Scand J Disabil Res. 2018; 20: 197-210
- Participation and satisfaction after spinal cord injury: results of a vocational and leisure outcome study.Spinal Cord. 2005; 43: 241-248
- Predictors of return to work 5 years after discharge for wheelchair-dependent individuals with spinal cord injury.J Rehabil Med. 2014; 46: 984-990
- To work or not to work: labour market participation of people with spinal cord injury living in Switzerland.Spinal Cord. 2012; 50: 521-526
- Labor market integration of people with disabilities: results from the Swiss Spinal Cord Injury Cohort Study.PLoS One. 2016; 11e0166955
- Assessment of disability in spinal cord injury.Disabil Rehabil. 2003; 25: 1065-1070
- Italian Group for the Epidemiological Study of Spinal Cord Injuries. Occurrence and predictors of employment after traumatic spinal cord injury: the GISEM Study.Spinal Cord. 2012; 50: 238-242
- SCI facts and figures.J Spinal Cord Med. 2017; 40: 126-127
- Community participation for individuals with spinal cord injury living in Queensland, Australia.Spinal Cord. 2017; 55: 192-197
- Labour market outcomes for people with a spinal cord injury.Econ Hum Biol. 2010; 8: 223-232
- Predicting employment status at 2 years' postdischarge from spinal cord injury rehabilitation.Rehabil Psychol. 2011; 56: 251-256
- Psychosocial factors affecting resilience in Nepalese individuals with earthquake-related spinal cord injury: a cross-sectional study.BMC Psychiatry. 2018; 18: 60
- People with spinal cord injury in Thailand.Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2017; 96: S120-S123
- Return to work after spinal cord injury in Malaysia.Spinal Cord. 2011; 49: 812-816
- Contributors of return to work for a cohort of spinal cord injured workers.Chin J Rehabil Theory Pract. 2010; 16: 678-682
- Factors that influence employment after spinal cord injury in South Korea.Ann Rehabil Med. 2014; 38: 38-45
- Physical and social condition of rehabilitated spinal cord injury patients in Japan: a long-term review.Paraplegia. 1988; 26: 165-176
- Return to work after spinal cord injury.Spinal Cord. 2000; 38: 51-55
- International comparison of vocational rehabilitation for persons with spinal cord injury: systems, practices, and barriers.Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2020; 26: 21-35
- Investigation of the social status of paraplegic individuals after medical rehabilitation.Spinal Cord. 1997; 35: 493-497
- Work, non-work and consequent satisfaction after spinal cord injury.Int J Rehabil Res. 1996; 19: 241-252
Article info
Publication history
Published online: July 12, 2020
Footnotes
Disclosures: none.
Identification
Copyright
© 2020 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine
ScienceDirect
Access this article on ScienceDirectLinked Article
- CorrectionArchives of Physical Medicine and RehabilitationVol. 102Issue 11
- PreviewIn the authorship listing for the InSCI group in “Describing functioning in people living with spinal cord injury across 22 countries: a graphic modeling approach” ( https://www.archives-pmr.org/article/S0003-9993 (20)30958-8/fulltext) Daniela Utiyama, PhD should be listed in that group in place of Prof. Liniamara Batistella.
- Full-Text
- Preview