Advertisement
Original research| Volume 101, ISSUE 7, P1220-1232, July 2020

Establishing the Factor Structure of a Health-Related Quality of Life Measurement System for Caregivers of Persons Living With Traumatic Brain Injury

  • Jason H. Raad
    Affiliations
    Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
    Search for articles by this author
  • David S. Tulsky
    Affiliations
    Center for Assessment Research and Translation, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE
    Search for articles by this author
  • Rael T. Lange
    Affiliations
    Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD

    National Intrepid Center of Excellence, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD

    Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center, Silver Spring, MD

    Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
    Search for articles by this author
  • Tracey A. Brickell
    Affiliations
    Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD

    National Intrepid Center of Excellence, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD

    Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center, Silver Spring, MD

    Edward Hebert School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD
    Search for articles by this author
  • Angelle M. Sander
    Affiliations
    H. Ben Taub Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Baylor College of Medicine & Harris Health System, Houston, TX

    Brain Injury Research Center, TIRR Memorial Hermann, Houston, TX
    Search for articles by this author
  • Robin A. Hanks
    Affiliations
    Rehabilitation Institute of Michigan, Department of Psychology and Neuropsychology, Detroit, MI

    Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI
    Search for articles by this author
  • Louis French
    Affiliations
    Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD

    National Intrepid Center of Excellence, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD

    Edward Hebert School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD
    Search for articles by this author
  • Jennifer A. Miner
    Affiliations
    Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
    Search for articles by this author
  • Pamela A. Kisala
    Affiliations
    Center for Assessment Research and Translation, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE
    Search for articles by this author
  • Noelle E. Carlozzi
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author Noelle E. Carlozzi, PhD, Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Michigan, North Campus Research Complex, 2800 Plymouth Road, Building NCRC B14, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2800.
    Affiliations
    Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
    Search for articles by this author
Published:April 18, 2020DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2020.03.014

      Abstract

      Objectives

      To understand the factor structure of health-related quality of life specific to caregivers of people living with traumatic brain injury (TBI).

      Design

      Prospective, cross-sectional data collection.

      Setting

      Three TBI Model Systems rehabilitation hospitals, an academic medical center, and a military medical treatment facility.

      Participants

      Caregivers (N=558) of people who have sustained a TBI (344 caregivers of civilians and 214 caregivers of service members or veterans; 85% women; 58% spouses; mean age, 46.12±14.07y) who have provided care for an average of 5.82±5.40 years.

      Interventions

      Not applicable.

      Main Outcomes Measures

      The Traumatic Brain Injury Caregiver Quality of Life (TBI-CareQOL) measurement system including 10 Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System item banks (anger, anxiety, depression, social isolation, sleep disturbance, fatigue, ability to participate in social roles and activities, satisfaction with social roles and activities, emotional support, informational support) and 5 TBI-CareQOL banks (feelings of loss–self, feelings of loss–person with TBI, feeling trapped, caregiver-specific anxiety, caregiver strain).

      Results

      Confirmatory factor analysis model fit indices were compared for 14 empirically derived and 5 theoretically derived models. Confirmatory factor analysis results indicated that the best model fit was for a 6-factor model with dimensions that included mental health, social support, social participation, social isolation, physical health, and caregiver emotion.

      Conclusions

      Results indicated that a 6-factor model provided the best model fit for health-related quality of life in caregivers of individuals with TBI. These results have utility for both research and clinical applications. Establishing the TBI-CareQOL’s factor structure provides preliminary evidence of the measurement system’s construct validity, helps inform the selection of measures for specific research or clinical interventions, and informs the development of composite scores.

      Keywords

      List of abbreviations:

      AIC (Akaike information criterion), CMIN/DF (χ2 divided by degrees of freedom), CFI (comparative fit index), HRQOL (health-related quality of life), PRO (patient-reported outcome), PROMIS (Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System), RMSEA (root mean square error of approximation), SMV (service member and veteran), TBI (traumatic brain injury), TBI-CareQOL (Traumatic Brain Injury Caregiver Quality of Life), TBI-QOL (Traumatic Brain Injury–Quality of Life), TLI (Tucker-Lewis Index)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Peterson A.B.
        • Xu L.
        • Daugherty J.
        • Breiding M.J.
        Surveillance report of traumatic brain injury-related emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and deaths, United States, 2014.
        Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta2019
        • Selassie A.W.
        • Zaloshnja E.
        • Langlois J.A.
        • Miller T.
        • Jones P.
        • Steiner C.
        Incidence of long-term disability following traumatic brain injury hospitalization, United States, 2003.
        J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2008; 23: 123-131
        • Helmick K.M.
        • Spells C.A.
        • Malik S.Z.
        • Davies C.A.
        • Marion D.W.
        • Hinds S.R.
        Traumatic brain injury in the US military: epidemiology and key clinical and research programs.
        Brain Imaging Behav. 2015; 9: 358-366
        • Zaninotto A.L.
        • Vicentini J.E.
        • Fregni F.
        • et al.
        Updates and current perspectives of psychiatric assessments after traumatic brain injury: a systematic review.
        Front Psychiatry. 2016; 7: 95
        • Hart T.
        • Millis S.
        • Novack T.
        • Englander J.
        • Fidler-Sheppard R.
        • Bell K.R.
        The relationship between neuropsychologic function and level of caregiver supervision at 1 year after traumatic brain injury.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003; 84: 221-230
        • Bailey E.K.
        • Nakase-Richardson R.
        • Patel N.
        • et al.
        Supervision needs following veteran and service member moderate to severe traumatic brain injury: a VA TBI Model Systems study.
        J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2017; 32: 245-254
        • Hall K.M.
        • Bushnik T.
        • Lakisic-Kazazic B.
        • Wright J.
        • Cantagallo A.
        Assessing traumatic brain injury outcome measures for long-term follow-up of community-based individuals.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001; 82: 367-374
        • Sabella S.A.
        • Andrzejewski J.H.
        • Wallgren A.
        Financial hardship after traumatic brain injury: a brief scale for family caregivers.
        Brain Inj. 2018; 32: 926-932
        • Van Houtven C.H.
        • Friedemann-Sánchez G.
        • Clothier B.
        • et al.
        Is policy well-targeted to remedy financial strain among caregivers of severely injured US service members?.
        Inquiry. 2012; 49: 339-351
        • Ramchand R.
        • Tanielian T.
        • Fisher M.P.
        • et al.
        Hidden heroes: America's military caregivers.
        Rand Corporation, Santa Monica2014
        • Brickell T.A.
        • French L.M.
        • Lippa S.M.
        • Lange R.T.
        Characteristics and health outcomes of post-9/11 caregivers of US service members and veterans following traumatic brain injury.
        J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2018; 33: 133-145
        • Sander A.M.
        • Caroselli J.S.
        • High Jr., W.M.
        • Becker C.
        • Neese L.
        • Scheibel R.
        Relationship of family functioning to progress in a post-acute rehabilitation programme following traumatic brain injury.
        Brain Inj. 2002; 16: 649-657
        • Lehan T.
        • Arango-Lasprilla J.C.
        • de los Reyes C.J.
        • Quijano M.C.
        The ties that bind: the relationship between caregiver burden and the neuropsychological functioning of TBI survivors.
        NeuroRehabilitation. 2012; 30: 87-95
        • Cella D.F.
        Measuring quality of life in palliative care.
        Semin Oncol. 1995; 22: 73-81
        • Cella D.F.
        Quality of life: the concept.
        J Palliat Care. 1992; 8: 8-13
        • Reeve B.B.
        • Hays R.D.
        • Bjorner J.B.
        • et al.
        Psychometric evaluation and calibration of health-related quality of life item banks: plans for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS).
        Med Care. 2007; 45: S22-S31
        • DeWalt D.A.
        • Rothrock N.
        • Yount S.
        • Stone A.A.
        • Group P.C.
        Evaluation of item candidates: the PROMIS qualitative item review.
        Med Care. 2007; 45: S12-S21
        • Tulsky D.S.
        • Kisala P.A.
        • Victorson D.
        • et al.
        TBI-QOL: development and calibration of item banks to measure patient reported outcomes following traumatic brain injury.
        J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2016; 31: 40-51
        • Carlozzi N.E.
        • Kallen M.A.
        • Hanks R.
        • et al.
        The development of a new computer adaptive test to evaluate feelings of being trapped in caregivers of individuals with traumatic brain injury: TBI-CareQOL feeling trapped item bank.
        Arch Phys Med Rehab. 2019; 100: S43-S51
        • Carlozzi N.E.
        • Kratz A.L.
        • Sander A.M.
        • et al.
        Health-related quality of life in caregivers of individuals with traumatic brain injury: development of a conceptual model.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015; 96: 105-113
        • Carlozzi N.E.
        • Tulsky D.S.
        • Kisala P.A.
        Traumatic brain injury patient-reported outcome measure: identification of health-related quality-of-life issues relevant to individuals with traumatic brain injury.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011; 92: S52-S60
        • Pilkonis P.A.
        • Choi S.W.
        • Reise S.P.
        • et al.
        Item banks for measuring emotional distress from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®): depression, anxiety, and anger.
        Assessment. 2011; 18: 263-283
        • Hahn E.A.
        • Devellis R.F.
        • Bode R.K.
        • et al.
        Measuring social health in the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS): item bank development and testing.
        Qual Life Res. 2010; 19: 1035-1044
        • Buysse D.J.
        • Yu L.
        • Moul D.E.
        • et al.
        Development and validation of patient-reported outcome measures for sleep disturbance and sleep-related impairments.
        Sleep. 2010; 33: 781-792
        • Cella D.
        • Lai J.S.
        • Jensen S.E.
        • et al.
        PROMIS fatigue item bank had clinical validity across diverse chronic conditions.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 2016; 73: 128-134
        • Hahn E.A.
        • DeWalt D.A.
        • Bode R.K.
        • et al.
        New English and Spanish social health measures will facilitate evaluating health determinants.
        Health Psychol. 2014; 33: 490-499
        • Carlozzi N.E.
        • Kallen M.A.
        • Ianni P.A.
        • et al.
        The development of two new computer adaptive tests to evaluate feelings of loss in caregivers of individuals with traumatic brain injury: TBI-CareQOL feelings of loss-self and feelings of loss-person with traumatic brain injury.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019; 100: S31-S42
        • Carlozzi N.E.
        • Lange R.T.
        • French L.M.
        • et al.
        Understanding health-related quality of life in caregivers of civilians and service members/veterans with traumatic brain injury: establishing the reliability and validity of PROMIS fatigue and sleep disturbance item banks.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019; 100: S102-S109
        • Corrigan J.D.
        • Cuthbert J.P.
        • Whiteneck G.G.
        • et al.
        Representativeness of the Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems National Database.
        J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2012; 27: 391-403
        • Carlozzi N.E.
        • Kallen M.A.
        • Hanks R.
        • et al.
        The TBI-CareQOL measurement system: development and preliminary validation of health-related quality of life measures for caregivers of civilians and service members/veterans with traumatic brain injury.
        Arch Phys Med Rehab. 2019; 100: S1-S12
        • Cicerone K.D.
        • Mott T.
        • Azulay J.
        • Friel J.C.
        Community integration and satisfaction with functioning after intensive cognitive rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004; 85: 943-950
        • Choi S.W.
        Firestar: computerized adaptive testing simulation program for polytomous item response theory models.
        Appl Psychol Meas. 2009; 33: 644
        • Vangel Jr., S.J.
        • Rapport L.J.
        • Hanks R.A.
        Effects of family and caregiver psychosocial functioning on outcomes in persons with traumatic brain injury.
        J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2011; 26: 20-29
        • Hoe S.L.
        Issues and procedures in adopting structural equation modeling technique.
        JAQM. 2008; 3: 76-83
        • Hatcher L.
        A step-by-step approach to using the SAS system for factor analysis and structural equation modeling.
        SAS Institute, Cary, NC2005
        • Kline R.B.
        Principles and practice of structural equation modeling.
        The Guilford Press, New York2005
        • MacCallum R.C.
        • Browne M.W.
        • Sugawara H.M.
        Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling.
        Psychol Methods. 1996; 1: 130-149
        • Kenny D.A.
        Measuring model fit.
        2015 (Available at: http://davidakenny.net/cm/fit.htm. Accessed May 14, 2020)
        • Tabachnick B.G.
        • Fidell L.S.
        • Ullman J.B.
        Using multivariate statistics. 5. Pearson, Boston2007
        • Anderson D.
        • Burnham K.
        Model selection and multi-model inference.
        Springer-Verlag, New York2004: 63
        • Sherer M.
        • Poritz J.M.P.
        • Tulsky D.
        • Kisala P.
        • Leon-Novelo L.
        • Ngan E.
        Conceptual structure of health-related quality of life for persons with traumatic brain injury: confirmatory factor analysis of the TBI-QOL.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020; 101: 62-71
        • Gershon R.C.
        • Lai J.S.
        • Bode R.
        • et al.
        Neuro-QOL: quality of life item banks for adults with neurological disorders: item development and calibrations based upon clinical and general population testing.
        Qual Life Res. 2012; 21: 475-486
        • Dijkers M.P.
        Quality of life after traumatic brain injury: a review of research approaches and findings.
        Arch Phys Med Rehab. 2004; 85: 21-35
        • Watson D.
        • Tellegen A.
        Toward a consensual structure of mood.
        Psychol Bull. 1985; 98: 219-235
        • Kreitzer N.
        • Kurowski B.G.
        • Bakas T.
        Systematic review of caregiver and dyad interventions after adult traumatic brain injury.
        Arch Phys Med Rehab. 2018; 99: 2342-2354
        • Shepherd-Banigan M.E.
        • Shapiro A.
        • McDuffie J.R.
        • et al.
        Interventions that support or involve caregivers or families of patients with traumatic injury: A systematic review.
        J Gen Intern Med. 2018; 33: 1177-1186
        • Patrick D.L.
        • Deyo R.A.
        Generic and disease-specific measures in assessing health status and quality of life.
        Med Care. 1989; : S217-S232
        • Bowling A.
        Health-related quality of life: conceptual meaning, use and measurement. Measuring disease: a review of sisease-specific quality of life measurement scales.
        Open University Press, Buckingham2001: 1-22
        • Parks S.H.
        • Pilisuk M.
        Caregiver burden: gender and the psychological costs of caregiving.
        Am J Orthopsychiatry. 1991; 61: 501-509
        • Sharma N.
        • Chakrabarti S.
        • Grover S.
        Gender differences in caregiving among family - caregivers of people with mental illnesses.
        World J Psychiatr. 2016; 6: 7-17
        • Barusch A.S.
        • Spaid W.M.
        Gender differences in caregiving: why do wives report greater burden?.
        Gerontologist. 1989; 29: 667-676
        • Boerner K.
        • Schulz R.
        • Horowitz A.
        Positive aspects of caregiving and adaptation to bereavement.
        Psychol Aging. 2004; 19: 668-675
        • Kim Y.
        • Baker F.
        • Spillers R.L.
        • Wellisch D.K.
        Psychological adjustment of cancer caregivers with multiple roles.
        Psychooncology. 2006; 15: 795-804