Advertisement
Brief report| Volume 101, ISSUE 6, P1064-1067, June 2020

Can the Nociception Coma Scale-Revised Be Used in Patients With a Tracheostomy?

Published:November 22, 2019DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2019.09.020

      Highlights

      • The Nociception Coma Scale-Revised (NCS-R) has been developed to assess nociception in patients with disorders of consciousness.
      • Verbal and total scores of the NCS-R are lower in patients with a tracheostomy.
      • Facial and motor subscores do not differ between patients with or without tracheostomy.
      • NCS-R scores should be cautiously interpreted in the presence of tracheostomy.
      • However, our findings support the use of the NCS-R in real clinical practice.

      Abstract

      Objective

      To investigate the influence of the presence of a tracheostomy tube to assess pain with the Nociception Coma Scale-Revised (NCS-R) in patients with disorders of consciousness (DOC).

      Design

      A cohort study in which patients were evaluated at a single time point.

      Setting

      Patients were evaluated in a tertiary care hospital.

      Participants

      Patients (N=125) (unresponsive wakefulness syndrome [UWS]: 46 patients, minimally conscious state [MCS]: 74 patients, emerging from MCS [eMCS]: 5 patients, mean age: 46±16y, time since injury: 817±1280d) in a convenience sample were evaluated with the NCS-R after noxious stimulation.

      Interventions

      Not applicable.

      Main Outcome Measures

      We compared the NCS-R scores of patients with and without tracheostomy with a Mann-Whitney U test. A secondary outcome was to evaluate the influence of the presence of a tracheostomy on the previously described cutoff score of 2.

      Results

      The presence of a tracheostomy was associated with lower verbal subscores (P=.002) as well as total scores (P=.039). The cutoff score of 2 remained valid for the group of patients with tracheostomy with a high sensitivity (71.43%) and specificity (89.29%), as well as when we excluded the verbal subscore of the NCS-R (sensitivity=83.2% and specificity=92.4%).

      Conclusion

      Our study confirms the validity of the NCS-R in DOC patients with a tracheostomy. However, the presence of a nonspeaking tracheostomy should be clearly mentioned when applying the NCS-R, because it significantly lowers the verbal subscore.

      Keywords

      List of abbreviations:

      DOC (disorders of consciousness), MCS (minimally conscious state), NCS-R (Nociception Coma Scale Revised), UWS (unresponsive wakefulness syndrome)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Laureys S.
        • Celesia G.G.
        • Cohadon F.
        • et al.
        Unresponsive wakefulness syndrome: a new name for the vegetative state or apallic syndrome.
        BMC Med. 2010; 8: 68
        • Giacino J.T.
        • Ashwal S.
        • Childs N.
        • et al.
        The minimally conscious state: definition and diagnostic criteria.
        Neurology. 2002; 58: 349-353
        • Laureys S.
        • Faymonville M.E.
        • Peigneux P.
        • et al.
        Cortical processing of noxious somatosensory stimuli in the persistent vegetative state.
        Neuroimage. 2002; 17: 732-741
        • Boly M.
        • Faymonville M.E.
        • Schnakers C.
        • et al.
        Perception of pain in the minimally conscious state with PET activation: an observational study.
        Lancet Neurol. 2008; 7: 1013-1020
        • Schnakers C.
        • Chatelle C.
        • Vanhaudenhuyse A.
        • et al.
        The Nociception Coma Scale: a new tool to assess nociception in disorders of consciousness.
        Pain. 2010; 148: 215-219
        • Chatelle C.
        • Majerus S.
        • Whyte J.
        • et al.
        A sensitive scale to assess nociceptive pain in patients with disorders of consciousness.
        J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2012; 83: 1233-1237
        • Chatelle C.
        • Hauger S.L.
        • Martial C.
        • et al.
        Assessment of nociception and pain in participants in an unresponsive or minimally conscious state after acquired brain injury: the relation between the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised and the Nociception Coma Scale-Revised.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018; 99: 1755-1762
        • Chatelle C.
        • De Val M.D.
        • Catano A.
        • et al.
        Is the Nociception Coma Scale-Revised a useful clinical tool for managing pain in patients with disorders of consciousness?.
        Clin J Pain. 2016; 32: 321-326
        • Vink P.
        • Eskes A.M.
        • Lindeboom R.
        • et al.
        Nurses assessing pain with the Nociception Coma Scale: interrater reliability and validity.
        Pain Manag Nurs. 2014; 15: 881-887
        • Suraseranivongse S.
        • Yuvapoositanont P.
        • Srisakkrapikoop P.
        • et al.
        A comparison of pain scales in patients with disorders of consciousness following craniotomy.
        J Med Assoc Thai. 2015; 98: 684-692
        • Giacino J.
        • Kalmar K.
        • Whyte J.
        The JFK Coma Recovery Scale-Revised: measurement characteristics and diagnostic utility.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004; 85: 2020e9
        • Teasdale G.
        • Jennett B.
        Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness: a practical scale.
        Lancet. 1974; 2: 81e4
        • Kalmar K.
        • Giacino J.T.
        The JFK Coma Recovery Scale—Revised.
        Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2005; 15: 454-460