We read the article by Uda et al entitled “Intensive In-hospital Rehabilitation After
Hip Fracture Surgery and Activities of Daily Living in Patients With Dementia: Retrospective
Analysis of a Nationwide Inpatient Database.”
1
The authors analyzed a large sample size (n=43,206) of the nationwide inpatient administrative
claims and discharge database in Japan and examined whether earlier, more frequent,
and larger daily amounts of postoperative rehabilitation on activities of daily living
(ADL), measured by the 100-point Barthel Index (BI) scale, were effective for patients
with dementia who underwent hip fracture surgery. The authors concluded earlier, more
frequent, and larger daily amounts of rehabilitation were associated with better recovery
in the BI scores.
1
We believe the study is meaningful in terms of conducting new rehabilitation strategy
for patients with dementia after hip fractures and agree the intensive rehabilitation
is somewhat effective for recovery in ADL. On the other hand, we have concerns regarding
the effect sizes of early and intensive interventions in their study; the effect sizes
were only −0.38 for early rehabilitation and 4.37-6.60 for large amounts of rehabilitation,
which we believe are not clinically significant. Here, we discuss the interpretation
of the findings from Uda’s article in respect to clinical and statistical significance.To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Archives of Physical Medicine and RehabilitationAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- Intensive in-hospital rehabilitation after hip fracture surgery and activities of daily living in patients with dementia: retrospective analysis of a nationwide inpatient database.Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019; 100: 2301-2307
- Beyond statistical significance: clinical interpretation of rehabilitation research literature.Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2014; 9: 726-736
- Establishing the minimal clinically important difference of the Barthel Index in stroke patients.Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2007; 21: 233-238
- Validity and responsiveness of Barthel Index for measuring functional recovery after hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture.Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2018; 138: 1671-1677
- How can we keep patients with dementia safe in our acute hospitals? A review of challenges and solutions.J R Soc Med. 2013; 106: 355-361
Article info
Footnotes
Disclosures: none.
Identification
Copyright
© 2019 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine
ScienceDirect
Access this article on ScienceDirectLinked Article
- Intensive In-Hospital Rehabilitation After Hip Fracture Surgery and Activities of Daily Living in Patients With Dementia: Retrospective Analysis of a Nationwide Inpatient DatabaseArchives of Physical Medicine and RehabilitationVol. 100Issue 12
- Author’s Response to Letter to the EditorArchives of Physical Medicine and RehabilitationVol. 101Issue 1
- PreviewWe thank the authors of the letter to the editor for their comments regarding our study. They argued that the effect sizes of earlier initiation of postoperative rehabilitation or larger daily amounts of rehabilitation on the Barthel Index (BI) in our study were statistically significant but not clinically significant. Their comments are based on the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of the BI reported in 2 previous studies1,2: one reported the MICD of the BI in patients with stroke, and the other reported the MCID of the BI at 12 months after hip fracture surgery in patients without severe cognitive impairment.
- Full-Text
- Preview