Advertisement
Department Editorial| Volume 101, ISSUE 1, P166-167, January 2020

Editorial: An End to Ordinal Misrule?

Published:October 23, 2019DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2019.08.478
      Progress in science is shackled by its observational and measurement technologies. Germs were theorized as a source of human illness for over a thousand years along with other now disproven theories. It took the development of the microscope to verify the existence of harmful bacteria and debunk alternative theories. Identifying another harmful microbial, the virus, awaited the development of the electron microscope.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Merbitz C.
        • Morris J.
        • Grip J.C.
        Ordinal scales and foundations of misinference.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1989; 70: 308-312
        • Wright B.D.
        • Linacre J.M.
        Observations are always ordinal; measurements, however, must be interval.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1989; 70: 857-860
      1. Funding opportunity announcement, dynamic assessment of patient-reported chronic disease outcomes (RFA-RM-04-011).
        (Available at:) (Accessed August 25, 2019)
        • Grimby G.
        • Tennant A.
        • Tesio L.
        Editorial: the use of raw scores from ordinal scales: time to end malpractice?.
        J Rehabil Med. 2012; 44: 97-98
      2. Health Measures. Neuro-QoL.
        (Available at:) (Accessed August 25, 2019)
        • Heinemann A.W.
        • Kisala P.A.
        • Boulton A.J.
        • et al.
        Development and calibration of the TBI-QOL Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities and TBI-QOL Satisfaction with Social Roles and Activities item banks and short forms.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020; 101: 20-32
        • Kisala P.A.
        • Tulsky D.S.
        • Boulton A.J.
        • et al.
        Development and psychometric characteristics of the TBI-QOL Independence item bank and short form and the TBI-QOL Asking for Help Scale.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020; 101: 33-42
        • Carlozzi N.E.
        • Kisala P.A.
        • Boulton A.J.
        • et al.
        Measuring pain in TBI: development of the TBI-QOL Pain Interference item bank and short form.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020; 101: 11-19
        • Sherer M.
        • Poritz J.M.P.
        • Tulsky D.
        • Kisala P.
        • Leon-Novelo L.
        • Ngan E.
        Conceptual structure of health-related quality of life for persons with traumatic brain injury: confirmatory factor analysis of the TBI-QOL.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020; 101: 62-71
        • Tyner C.E.
        • Boulton A.J.
        • Sherer M.
        • Kisala P.A.
        • Glutting J.J.
        • Tulsky D.S.
        Development of composite scores for the TBI-QOL.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020; 101: 43-53
        • Poritz J.M.P.
        • Sherer M.
        • Kisala P.A.
        • Tulsky D.
        • Leon-Novelo L.
        • Ngan E.
        Responsiveness of the Traumatic Brain Injury Quality of Life (TBI-QOL) measurement system.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020; 101: 54-61