Advertisement
Original research| Volume 101, ISSUE 1, P95-105, January 2020

Effect of Rehabilitation Treatments on Disability in Persons With Disorders of Consciousness: A Propensity Score Study

Published:August 26, 2019DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2019.07.010

      Highlights

      • Rehabilitation (physical and cognitive) reduced the clinical worsening over time.
      • The difference between the groups that received treatment vs those that did not receive treatment was approximately 6.5 Disability Rating Scale points.
      • Cognitive rehabilitation was administered to patients who were less clinically impaired.

      Abstract

      Objective

      To evaluate the effects of rehabilitation (physical and cognitive) treatments on the diagnosis severity and Disability Rating Scale (DRS) scores, adjusted for a number of potential confounders measured at baseline, in a large cohort of patients with disorders of consciousness across time.

      Design and Setting

      An observational, longitudinal (2 evaluations), multicenter project was made in 90 Italian centers.

      Participants

      Patients (N=364) with a diagnosis of disorders of consciousness.

      Main Outcome Measures

      Primary outcome was the severity of diagnosis, expressed on an ordinal scale (Other<MCS<VS<death). In the Other group were included patients who emerged from an MCS and recovered consciousness. The secondary outcome was the DRS score (range of 0-30 with 30 being the worst value). The DRS is a tool used to define the level of residual disability, commonly used to classify the level of functional impairment in patients with acquired brain injury. Both outcomes were measured for each wave.

      Results

      A total of 364 subjects having a complete set of demographic, clinical, and pharmacologic data were included in the propensity score (PS) analysis. Results showed that the rehabilitation treatments (physical and cognitive) reduced the clinical worsening over time in both severity diagnosis and DRS (around 6.5 points) in patients with disorders of consciousness across different propensity score strategies (ie, PS matching, PS adjustment, and PS-weighted procedures). In addition, cognitive protocols seem to be limited to patients with a median value of DRS=23.

      Conclusions

      Our propensity score analysis suggests that rehabilitation treatment protocols seem effective and should be applied to a broader spectrum of patients with disorders of consciousness.

      Keywords

      List of abbreviations:

      CI (confidence interval), DOC (disorder of consciousness), DRS (Disability Rating Scale), IPTW (inverse probability of treatment weighting), IQR (interquartile range), MCS (minimally conscious state), OP (only physical), PPC (physical plus cognitive), PS (propensity score), VS (vegetative state)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Bernat J.L.
        Chronic disorders of consciousness.
        Lancet. 2006; 367: 1181-1192
        • Giacino J.T.
        • Malone R.
        The vegetative and minimally conscious states.
        Handb Clin Neurol. 2008; 90: 99-111
        • Giacino J.T.
        • Ashwal S.
        • Childs N.
        • et al.
        The minimally conscious state: definition and diagnostic criteria.
        Neurology. 2002; 58: 349-353
        • Leong B.
        The vegetative and minimally conscious states in children: spasticity, muscle contracture and issues for physiotherapy treatment.
        Brain Inj. 2002; 16: 217-230
        • Wheatley-Smith L.
        • McGuinness S.
        • Colin Wilson F.
        • Scott G.
        • McCann J.
        • Caldwell S.
        Intensive physiotherapy for vegetative and minimally conscious state patients: A retrospective audit and analysis of therapy intervention.
        Disabil Rehabil. 2013; 35: 1006-1014
        • Keller I.
        • Hulsdunk A.
        • Muller F.
        The influence of acoustic and tactile stimulation on vegetative parameters and EEG in persistent vegetative state.
        Funct Neurol. 2007; 22: 159-163
        • Lombardi F.
        • Taricco M.
        • De Tanti A.
        • Telaro E.
        • Liberati A.
        Sensory stimulation for brain injured individuals in coma or vegetative state.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002; CD001427
        • Padilla R.
        • Domina A.
        Effectiveness of sensory stimulation to improve arousal and alertness of people in a coma or persistent vegetative state after traumatic brain injury: a systematic review.
        Am J Occup Ther. 2016; 70 (7003180030p1-8)
        • Meythaler J.M.
        • Depalma L.
        • Devivo M.J.
        • Guin-Renfroe S.
        • Novack T.A.
        Sertraline to improve arousal and alertness in severe traumatic brain injury secondary to motor vehicle crashes.
        Brain Inj. 2001; 15: 321-331
        • Reynolds J.C.
        • Rittenberger J.C.
        • Callaway C.W.
        Methylphenidate and amantadine to stimulate reawakening in comatose patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest.
        Resuscitation. 2013; 84: 818-824
        • Giacino J.T.
        • Whyte J.
        • Bagiella E.
        • et al.
        Placebo-controlled trial of amantadine for severe traumatic brain injury.
        N Engl J Med. 2012; 366: 819-826
        • Liepert J.
        Update on pharmacotherapy for stroke and traumatic brain injury recovery during rehabilitation.
        Curr Opin Neurol. 2016; 29: 700-705
        • Matsuda W.
        • Komatsu Y.
        • Yanaka K.
        • Matsumura A.
        Levodopa treatment for patients in persistent vegetative or minimally conscious states.
        Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2005; 15: 414-427
        • Mura E.
        • Pistoia F.
        • Sara M.
        • Sacco S.
        • Carolei A.
        • Govoni S.
        Pharmacological modulation of the state of awareness in patients with disorders of consciousness: an overview.
        Curr Pharm Des. 2014; 20: 4121-4139
        • Leonardi M.
        • Sattin D.
        • Raggi A.
        An Italian population study on 600 persons in vegetative state and minimally conscious state.
        Brain Inj. 2013; 27: 473-484
        • Leonardi M.
        • Covelli V.
        • Giovannetti A.M.
        • Raggi A.
        • Sattin D.
        National Consortium Functioning and Disability in Vegetative and in Minimal Conscious State Patients. ICF-DOC: the ICF dedicated checklist for evaluating functioning and disability in people with disorders of consciousness.
        Int J Rehabil Res. 2014; 37: 197-204
        • Rappaport M.
        • Hall K.M.
        • Hopkins K.
        • Belleza T.
        • Cope D.N.
        Disability rating scale for severe head trauma: coma to community.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1982; 63: 118-123
        • WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology
        ATC/DDD index 2019.
        (Available at:) (Accessed February 20, 2019)
        • Rosenbaum P.R.
        • Donald B.
        The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects.
        Rubin Biometrika. 1983; 70: 41-55
        • Austin P.C.
        An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies.
        Multivariate Behav Res. 2011; 46: 399-424
        • Smith P.L.
        Splines as a useful and convenient statistical tool.
        Am Stat. 1979; 33: 57-62
        • Brookhart M.A.
        • Schneeweiss S.
        • Rothman K.J.
        • Glynn R.J.
        • Avorn J.
        • Stürmer T.
        Variable selection for propensity score models.
        Am J Epidemiol. 2006; 163: 1149-1156
        • McCaffrey D.F.
        • Ridgeway G.
        • Morral A.R.
        Propensity score estimation with boosted regression for evaluating causal effects in observational studies.
        Psychol Methods. 2004; 9: 403-425
        • Guo S.
        • Fraser M.W.
        Propensity score analysis: statistical methods and applications.
        2nd ed. Sage Publications, Inc, Thousand Oaks2015
        • Austin P.C.
        A comparison of 12 algorithms for matching on the propensity score.
        Stat Med. 2014; 33: 1057-1069
        • Finch W.
        • Bolin J.
        • Kelley K.
        Multilevel modeling using R.
        CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton2014
        • Lewin J.W.
        • O'Rourke N.A.
        • Chiow A.K.
        • et al.
        Long-term survival in laparoscopic vs open resection for colorectal liver metastases: inverse probability of treatment weighting using propensity scores.
        HPB (Oxford). 2016; 18: 183-191
        • Ho D.E.
        • Imai K.
        • King G.
        • Stuart E.A.
        MatchIt: nonparametric preprocessing for parametric causal inference.
        J Stat Softw. 2011; 42: 1-28
        • Ridgeway G.
        • McCaffrey D.
        • Morral A.
        • Griffin B.A.
        • Burgette L.
        Toolkit for Weighting and Analysis of Nonequivalent Groups. R package version 1.5, twang2017 (Available at: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=twang. Accessed October 11, 2019.)
        • van der Wal W.M.
        • Geskus R.B.
        Ipw: an R package for inverse probability weighting.
        J Stat Softw. 2011; 43: 1-23
        • Christensen R.H.
        Package ‘ordinal.
        (Available at:) (Accessed March 28, 2019)
        • Bates D.
        • Maechler M.
        • Bolker B.
        • Walker S.
        Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4.
        J Stat Softw. 2015; 67: 1-48
        • Canty A.
        • Ripley B.
        Package ‘boot.
        (Available at:) (Accessed March 28, 2019)
        • Hernàn M.A.
        • Brumback B.A.
        • Robins J.M.
        Marginal structural models to estimate the causal effect of zidovudine on the survival of HIV-positive men.
        Epidemiology. 2000; 11: 561-570
        • Cole S.R.
        • Hernàan M.A.
        Constructing inverse probability weights for marginal structural models.
        Am J Epidemiol. 2008; 168: 656-664
        • Sprung C.L.
        • Danis M.
        • Iapichino G.
        • et al.
        Triage of intensive care patients: identifying agreement and controversy.
        Intensive Care Med. 2013; 39: 1916-1924
        • Avesani R.
        • Roncari L.
        • Khansefid M.
        • et al.
        The Italian National Registry of severe acquired brain injury: epidemiological, clinical and functional data of 1469 patients.
        Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2013; 49: 611-618
        • Lancioni G.
        • O'Reilly M.
        • Singh N.
        • et al.
        Evaluation of technology-assisted learning setups for undertaking assessment and providing intervention to persons with a diagnosis of vegetative state.
        Dev Neurorehabil. 2009; 12: 411-420
        • Lombardi F.
        • Taricco M.
        • De Tanti A.
        • Telaro E.
        • Liberati A.
        Sensory stimulation of brain-injured individuals in coma or vegetative state: results of a Cochrane systematic review.
        Clin Rehabil. 2002; 16: 464-472
        • Estraneo A.
        • Moretta P.
        • Loreto V.
        • Lanzillo B.
        • Santoro L.
        • Trojano L.
        Late recovery after traumatic, anoxic, or hemorrhagic long-lasting vegetative state.
        Neurology. 2010; 75: 239-245
        • Giacino J.T.
        • Kalmar K.
        • Whyte J.
        The JFK Coma Recovery Scale-Revised: measurement characteristics and diagnostic utility.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004; 85: 2020-2029