Main Outcome Measure
List of abbreviations:BMI (body mass index), CIC (clean intermittent catheterization), OR (odds ratio), SCI (spinal cord injury), SF-12 (12-Item Short Form Health Survey), UE (upper extremity)
Purchase one-time access:Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
One-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:Subscribe to Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
- Targeting recovery: priorities of the spinal cord-injured population.J Neurotrauma. 2004; 21: 1371-1383
- Who wants to walk? Preferences for recovery after SCI: a longitudinal and cross-sectional study.Spinal Cord. 2008; 46: 500-506
- Management of bladder dysfunction and satisfaction of life after spinal cord injury in Norway.J Spinal Cord Med. 2014; 37: 310-316
- Bladder management and quality of life after spinal cord injury.Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2001; 80: 916-922
- Women's experiences of living with neurogenic bladder and bowel after spinal cord injury: life controlled by bladder and bowel.Disabil Rehabil. 2016; 38: 573-581
- Health-related quality of life of patients using clean intermittent catheterization for neurogenic bladder secondary to spinal cord injury.Urology. 2005; 65: 306-310
- The health and life priorities of individuals with spinal cord injury: a systematic review.J Neurotrauma. 2012; 29: 1548-1555
- Bladder management and risk of bladder stone formation in spinal cord injured patients.J Urol. 2003; 170: 1734-1737
- Effect of bladder management on urological complications in spinal cord injured patients.J Urol. 2000; 163: 768-772
- Bladder management after spinal cord injury in the United States 1972 to 2005.J Urol. 2010; 184: 213-217
- Ensuring patient adherence to clean intermittent self-catheterization.Patient Prefer Adherence. 2014; 8: 191-198
- An assessment of the use of a continent catheterizable stoma in female tetraplegics.BJU Int. 2004; 94: 595-597
- How many spinal cord injury pCatients can catheterize their own bladder? The epidemiology of upper extremity function as it affects bladder management.Spinal Cord. 2016; 54 (287-91)
- Predictors of long-term bladder management in spinal cord injury patients-Upper extremity function may matter most.Neurourology and urodynamics. 2018; 37: 1106-1112
- Development and initial evaluation of the SCI-FI/AT.J Spinal Cord Med. 2015; 38: 409-418
- Study protocol: patient reported outcomes for bladder management strategies in spinal cord injury.BMC Urol. 2017; 17: 95
- A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity.Med Care. 1996; 34: 220-233
- Neurogenic bowel dysfunction score.Spinal Cord. 2006; 44: 625-631
- Catheter policies for management of long term voiding problems in adults with neurogenic bladder disorders.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; 11: CD004375
- Reasons for clean intermittent catheterization cessation after spinal cord injury: results from the Neurogenic Bladder Research Group (NBRG).in: Western Section of the American Urologic Association - Abstracts 2018. 2018
- The capabilities of upper extremity instrument: reliability and validity of a measure of functional limitation in tetraplegia.Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998; 79: 1512-1521
- The Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength Sensibility and Prehension: reliability and validity.J Neurotrauma. 2012; 29: 905-914
- Do appreciable changes in the upper extremity motor capability to perform clean intermittent catheterization come about with time after traumatic spinal cord injury?.Neurourol Urodyn. 2019; 38 (975-80)
Supported by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (award no. CER14092138). All statements in this report, including its findings and conclusions, are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute.
Dr Stoffel has financial relationships with Uroplasty, Ipsen, and the US Department of Defense outside the submitted work. Dr Elliott has financial relationships with Boston Scientific, PercuVision, and Urotronic outside the submitted work. The other authors have nothing to disclose.