Advertisement
Original research| Volume 100, ISSUE 11, P2113-2118, November 2019

Download started.

Ok

Prospectively Classifying Community Walkers After Stroke: Who Are They?

      Abstract

      Objective

      To classify patients with stroke into subgroups based on their characteristics at the moment of discharge from inpatient rehabilitation in order to predict community ambulation outcome 6 months later.

      Design

      Prospective cohort study with a baseline measurement at discharge from inpatient care and final outcome determined after 6 months.

      Setting

      Community.

      Participants

      A cohort of patients (N=243) with stroke, referred for outpatient physical therapy, after completing inpatient rehabilitation in The Netherlands.

      Interventions

      Not applicable.

      Main Outcome Measures

      A classification model was developed using Classification And Regression Tree (CART) analysis. Final outcome was determined using the community ambulation questionnaire. Potential baseline predictors included patient demographics, stroke characteristics, use of assistive devices, comfortable gait speed, balance, strength, motivation, falls efficacy, anxiety, and depression.

      Results

      The CART model accurately predicted independent community ambulation in 181 of 193 patients with stroke, based on a comfortable gait speed at discharge of 0.5 meters per second or faster. In contrast, 27 of 50 patients with gait speeds below 0.5 meters per second were correctly predicted to become noncommunity walkers.

      Conclusions

      We show that comfortable gait speed is a key factor in the prognosis of community ambulation outcome. The CART model may support clinicians in organizing community services at the moment of discharge from inpatient care.

      List of abbreviations:

      CAQ (Community Ambulation Questionnaire), CART (Classification And Regression Tree), CI (confidence interval)

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Barclay R.E.
        • Stevenson T.J.
        • Poluha W.
        • Ripat J.
        • Nett C.
        • Srikesavan C.S.
        Interventions for improving community ambulation in individuals with stroke.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015; 3: CD010200
        • Veerbeek J.M.
        • van Wegen E.
        • van Peppen R.
        • et al.
        What is the evidence for physical therapy poststroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
        PLoS One. 2014; 9e87987
        • Lord S.E.
        • Rochester L.
        Measurement of community ambulation after stroke: current status and future developments.
        Stroke. 2005; 36: 1457-1461
        • World Health Organization
        International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF.
        World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland2001
        • Lord S.E.
        • McPherson K.
        • McNaughton H.K.
        • Rochester L.
        • Weatherall M.
        Community ambulation after stroke: how important and obtainable is it and what measures appear predictive?.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004; 85: 234-239
        • Robinson C.A.
        • Shumway-Cook A.
        • Ciol M.A.
        • Kartin D.
        Participation in community walking following stroke: subjective versus objective measures and the impact of personal factors.
        Phys Ther. 2011; 91: 1865-1876
        • Perry J.
        • Garrett M.
        • Gronley J.K.
        • Mulroy S.J.
        Classification of walking handicap in the stroke population.
        Stroke. 1995; 26: 982-989
        • van de Port I.G.
        • Kwakkel G.
        • Lindeman E.
        Community ambulation in patients with chronic stroke: how is it related to gait speed?.
        J Rehabil Med. 2008; 40: 23-27
        • Amatachaya S.
        • Chuadthong J.
        • Thaweewannaku T.
        • Srisim K.
        • Phonthee S.
        Levels of community ambulation ability in patients with stroke who live in a rural area.
        Malays J Med Sci. 2016; 23: 56-62
        • von Elm E.
        • Altman D.G.
        • Egger M.
        • et al.
        The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.
        Int J Surg. 2014; 12: 1495-1499
        • Veerbeek J.M.
        • Kwakkel G.
        • van Wegen E.E.
        • Ket J.C.
        • Heymans M.W.
        Early prediction of outcome of activities of daily living after stroke: a systematic review.
        Stroke. 2011; 42: 1482-1488
        • de Graaf J.A.
        • van Mierlo M.L.
        • Post M.W.M.
        • Achterberg W.P.
        • Kappelle L.J.
        • Visser-Meily J.M.A.
        Long-term restrictions in participation in stroke survivors under and over 70 years of age.
        Disabil Rehabil. 2018; 40: 637-645
        • Bijleveld-Uitman M.
        • van de Port I.
        • Kwakkel G.
        Is gait speed or walking distance a better predictor for community walking after stroke?.
        J Rehabil Med. 2013; 45: 535-540
        • Joa K.L.
        • Kwon S.Y.
        • Choi J.W.
        • Hong S.E.
        • Kim C.H.
        • Jung H.Y.
        Classification of walking ability of household walkers versus community walkers based on K-BBS, gait velocity and upright motor control.
        Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2015; 51: 619-625
        • Fulk G.D.
        • He Y.
        • Boyne P.
        • Dunning K.
        Predicting home and community walking activity poststroke.
        Stroke. 2017; 48: 406-411
        • An S.
        • Lee Y.
        • Shin H.
        • Lee G.
        Gait velocity and walking distance to predict community walking after stroke.
        Nurs Health Sci. 2015; 17: 533-538
        • Ng M.M.
        • Hill K.D.
        • Batchelor F.
        • Burton E.
        Factors predicting falls and mobility outcomes in patients with stroke returning home after rehabilitation who are at risk of falling.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017; 98: 2433-2441
        • Oh-Park M.
        • Hung C.
        • Chen P.
        • Barrett A.M.
        Severity of spatial neglect during acute inpatient rehabilitation predicts community mobility after stroke.
        PM R. 2014; 6: 716-722
        • Rosa M.C.
        • Marques A.
        • Demain S.
        • Metcalf C.D.
        Fast gait speed and self-perceived balance as valid predictors and discriminators of independent community walking at 6 months post-stroke--a preliminary study.
        Disabil Rehabil. 2015; 37: 129-134
        • Ferreira M.S.
        • Chamlian T.R.
        • Franca C.N.
        • Massaro A.R.
        Non-motor factors associated with the attainment of community ambulation after stroke.
        Clin Med Res. 2015; 13: 58-64
        • van de Port I.G.
        • Wevers L.E.
        • Lindeman E.
        • Kwakkel G.
        Effects of circuit training as alternative to usual physiotherapy after stroke: randomised controlled trial.
        BMJ. 2012; 344e2672
        • van de Port I.G.
        • Wevers L.
        • Roelse H.
        • van Kats L.
        • Lindeman E.
        • Kwakkel G.
        Cost-effectiveness of a structured progressive task-oriented circuit class training programme to enhance walking competency after stroke: the protocol of the FIT-Stroke trial.
        BMC Neurol. 2009; 9: 43
        • Collen F.M.
        • Wade D.T.
        • Bradshaw C.M.
        Mobility after stroke: reliability of measures of impairment and disability.
        Int Disabil Stud. 1990; 12: 6-9
        • Bohannon R.W.
        • Walsh S.
        • Joseph M.C.
        Ordinal and timed balance measurements: reliability and validity in patients with stroke.
        Clin Rehabil. 1993; 7: 9-13
        • Collin C.
        • Wade D.
        Assessing motor impairment after stroke: a pilot reliability study.
        J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1990; 53: 576-579
        • Graham J.E.
        • Ostir G.V.
        • Fisher S.R.
        • Ottenbacher K.J.
        Assessing walking speed in clinical research: a systematic review.
        J Eval Clin Pract. 2008; 14: 552-562
        • Tinetti M.E.
        • Richman D.
        • Powell L.
        Falls efficacy as a measure of fear of falling.
        J Gerontol. 1990; 45: P239-P243
        • Herrmann C.
        International experiences with the hospital anxiety and depression scale--a review of validation data and clinical results.
        J Psychosom Res. 1997; 42: 17-41
        • Tabachnik B.G.
        • Fidell L.S.
        Using multivariate statistics.
        3rd ed. HarperCollins, New York1996
        • Zhang H.
        • Singer B.
        Recursive partitioning and applications.
        2nd ed. Springer, New York2010
        • Lemon S.C.
        • Roy J.
        • Clark M.A.
        • Friedmann P.D.
        • Rakowski W.
        Classification and regression tree analysis in public health: methodological review and comparison with logistic regression.
        Ann Behav Med. 2003; 26: 172-181
        • Schmid A.
        • Duncan P.W.
        • Studenski S.
        • et al.
        Improvements in speed-based gait classifications are meaningful.
        Stroke. 2007; 38: 2096-2100
        • Veerbeek J.M.
        • Koolstra M.
        • Ket J.C.
        • van Wegen E.E.
        • Kwakkel G.
        Effects of augmented exercise therapy on outcome of gait and gait-related activities in the first 6 months after stroke: a meta-analysis.
        Stroke. 2011; 42: 3311-3315
        • Langhorne P.
        • Bernhardt J.
        • Kwakkel G.
        Stroke rehabilitation.
        Lancet. 2011; 377: 1693-1702