Advertisement

Identifying Gaps in Research on Rehabilitation for Patients With Head and Neck Cancer: A Scoping Review

      Abstract

      Objectives

      Examine the amount and nature of research activity in head and neck cancer (HNC) rehabilitation; highlight publication trends, including information about the authors, settings, and study designs; and identify gaps in the existing literature.

      Data Sources

      Eligible studies were identified using PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL databases.

      Study Selection

      Inclusion criteria included human subjects, English language, publication between 1/1/1990 and 4/30/2017, HNC patients at any timepoint in disease, and evaluation of rehabilitation outcomes as described by the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) framework. Exclusion criteria included intervention or outcome not specific to rehabilitation or the HNC population, and protocols or abstracts without corresponding full manuscripts.

      Data Extraction

      An established 6-step scoping review framework was utilized to develop the review protocol. A 3-level review was then performed. Data on eligible studies were collected using a Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) tool.

      Data Synthesis

      Among 2201 publications, 258 met inclusion criteria. Publication rate increased by 390% over the study timeframe. Most studies were observational (n=150). Few were interventional (n=35). The most common interventions focused on chewing or swallowing (n=14), followed by exercise (n=10). Most primary outcome measures fit the ICF definition of impairment; fewer fit the definitions of activity limitation or participation restriction.

      Conclusions

      Although research volume in HNC rehabilitation is increasing, the literature is dominated by small (≤100 patients), outpatient-based observational studies involving chewing or swallowing-related impairments. More prospective studies in multidisciplinary domains across the cancer care continuum are needed. There is particular need for interventional studies and prospective observational studies. Future studies should evaluate clinically-relevant activity limitations and participation restrictions. Rehabilitation professionals have an important role in the design of future HNC rehabilitation research.

      Keywords

      List of abbreviations:

      HNC (head and neck cancer), ICF (International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health), QOL (quality of life), REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

      1. Noone AM, Howlader N, Krapcho M, et al, editors. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2015. Available at: .https://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2015/. Accessed March 9, 2018.

        • Pulte D.
        • Brenner H.
        Changes in survival in head and neck cancers in the late 20th and early 21st century: a period analysis.
        Oncologist. 2010; 15: 994-1001
        • Cohen E.E.
        • LaMonte S.J.
        • Erb N.L.
        • et al.
        American Cancer Society Head and Neck Cancer Survivorship Care Guideline.
        CA Cancer J Clin. 2016; 66: 203-239
        • Nekhlyudov L.
        • Lacchetti C.
        • Davis N.B.
        • et al.
        Head and Neck Cancer Survivorship Care Guideline: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Endorsement of the American Cancer Society Guideline.
        J Clin Oncol. 2017; 35: 1606-1621
        • Robbins K.T.
        • Clayman G.
        • Levine P.A.
        • et al.
        Neck dissection classification update: revisions proposed by the American Head and Neck Society and the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.
        Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002; 128: 751-758
        • Bradley P.J.
        • Forlito A.
        • Silver C.E.
        • et al.
        Neck treatment and shoulder morbidity: still a challenge.
        Head Neck. 2011; 33: 1060-1067
        • Eickmeyer S.M.
        • Walczak C.K.
        • Myers K.B.
        • Lindstrom D.R.
        • Layde P.
        • Campbell B.H.
        Quality of life, shoulder range of motion, and spinal accessory nerve status in 5-year survivors of head and neck cancer.
        PM R. 2014; 6: 1073-1080
        • Gane E.M.
        • McPhail S.M.
        • Hatton A.L.
        • Panizza B.J.
        • O’Leary S.P.
        The relationship between physical impairments, quality of life and disability of the neck and upper limb in patients following neck dissection.
        J Cancer Surviv. 2018; 12: 619-631
        • Gane E.M.
        • Michaleff Z.A.
        • Cottrell M.A.
        • et al.
        Prevalence, incidence, and risk factors for shoulder and neck dysfunction after neck dissection: a systematic review.
        Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017; 43: 1199-1218
        • Güldiken Y.
        • Orthan K.S.
        • Demirel T.
        • Ural H.I.
        • Yücel E.A.
        • Değer K.
        Assessment of shoulder impairment after functional neck dissection: long term results.
        Auris Nasus Larynx. 2005; 32: 387-391
        • Hutcheson K.A.
        • Lewin J.S.
        Functional assessment and rehabilitation: how to maximize outcomes.
        Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2013; 46: 657-670
        • Ringash J.
        • Berstein L.J.
        • Devins G.
        • et al.
        Head and neck cancer survivorship: learning the needs, meeting the needs.
        Semin Radiat Oncol. 2018; 28: 64-74
        • Tschiesner U.
        • Linseisen E.
        • Baumann S.
        • et al.
        Assessment of functioning in patients with head and neck cancer according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF): a multicenter study.
        Laryngoscope. 2009; 119: 915-923
        • Verdonck-de Leeuw I.M.
        • van Bleek W.J.
        • Leemans C.R.
        • de Bree R.
        Employment and return to work in head and neck cancer survivors.
        Oral Oncol. 2010; 46: 56-60
        • Silver J.K.
        • Baima J.
        • Mayer R.S.
        Impairment-driven cancer rehabilitation: an essential component of quality care and survivorship.
        CA Cancer J Clin. 2013; 63: 295-317
        • Gamble G.L.
        • Gerber L.H.
        • Spill G.R.
        • Paul K.L.
        The future of cancer rehabilitation: emerging subspecialty.
        Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2011; 90: S76-S87
        • Silver J.K.
        Integrating rehabilitation into the cancer care continuum.
        PM R. 2017; 9: S291-S296
        • Egan M.Y.
        • McEwen S.
        • Sikora L.
        • Chasen M.
        • Fitch M.
        • Eldred S.
        Rehabilitation following cancer treatment.
        Disabil Rehabil. 2013; 35: 2245-2258
        • Stout N.L.
        • Alfano C.M.
        • Belter C.W.
        • et al.
        A bibliometric analysis of the landscape of cancer rehabilitation research (1992-2016).
        J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018; 110: 815-824
        • Rodriguez A.M.
        • Komar A.
        • Ringash J.
        • et al.
        A scoping review of rehabilitation interventions for survivors of head and neck cancer.
        Disabil Rehabil. 2018 Jul 6; ([Epub ahead of print])
        • Arksey H.
        • O'Malley L.
        Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework.
        Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005; 8: 19-32
        • Levac D.
        • Colquhoun H.
        • O'Brien K.K.
        Scoping studies: advancing the methodology.
        Implement Sci. 2010; 5: 69
        • Harris P.A.
        • Taylor R.
        • Thielke R.
        • Payne J.
        • Gonzalez N.
        • Conde J.G.
        Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.
        J Biomed Inform. 2009; 42: 377-381
        • U.S. National Library of Medicine
        Glossary of Common Site Terms.
        (Available at:) (Accessed May 22, 2018)
        • World Health Organization
        International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF).
        (Available at:) (Accessed May 22, 2018)
        • Thiese M.S.
        Observational and interventional study design types; an overview.
        Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2014; 24: 199-210
        • Kao Y.C.
        • Kramer J.M.
        • Liljenquist K.
        • Coster W.J.
        Association between impairment, function, and daily life task management in children and adolescents with autism.
        Dev Med Child Neurol. 2015; 57: 68-74
        • Adams J.
        • Burridge J.
        • Mullee M.
        • Hammond A.
        • Cooper C.
        Correlation between upper limb functional ability and structural hand impairment in an early rheumatoid population.
        Clin Rehabil. 2004; 18: 405-413
        • Gupta B.
        • Johnson N.W.
        • Kumar N.
        Global epidemiology of head and neck cancers: a continuing challenge.
        Oncology. 2016; 91: 13-23
        • Torre L.A.
        • Bray F.
        • Siegel R.L.
        • Ferlay J.
        • Lortet-Tieulent J.
        • Jemal A.
        Global cancer statistics, 2012.
        CA Cancer J Clin. 2015; 65: 87-108