Departments Letter to the Editor| Volume 100, ISSUE 6, P1191-1192, June 2019

Response to Letter Regarding “Minimal Clinically Important Difference of Berg Balance Scale in People With Multiple Sclerosis”

      We agree that an article must contain all relevant procedures and methodologies used in a study. We believe that we reported all the most important information for study replication taking into consideration reviewers’ suggestions and space and number of tables and references available for a short report.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Revicki D.
        • Hays R.D.
        • Cella D.
        • Sloan J.
        Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 2008; 61: 102-109
        • McGlothlin A.E.
        • Lewis R.J.
        Minimal clinically important difference: defining what really matters to patients.
        JAMA. 2014; 312: 1342-1343
        • Cattaneo D.
        • Jonsdottir J.
        • Regola A.
        • Carabalona R.
        Stabilometric assessment of context dependent balance recovery in persons with multiple sclerosis: a randomized controlled study.
        J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014; 11: 100
        • Cattaneo D.
        • Rasova K.
        • Gervasoni E.
        • Dobrovodskã G.
        • Montesano A.
        • Jonsdottir J.
        Falls prevention and balance rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis: a bi-centre randomised controlled trial.
        Disabil Rehabil. 2018; 40: 522-526
        • Jonsdottir J.
        • Gervasoni E.
        • Bowman T.
        • et al.
        Intensive multimodal training to improve gait resistance, mobility, balance and cognitive function in persons with multiple sclerosis: a pilot randomized controlled trial.
        Front Neurol. 2018; 9: 800
        • Nilsagård Y.
        • Carling A.
        • Forsberg A.
        Activities-specific balance confidence in people with multiple sclerosis.
        Mult Scler Int. 2012; 2012: 613925
        • Cattaneo D.
        • Regola A.
        • Meotti M.
        Validity of six balance disorders scales in persons with multiple sclerosis.
        Disabil Rehabil. 2006; 28: 789-795
        • Cohen J.
        Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences.
        2nd ed. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ1988
        • Haley S.M.
        • Fragala-Pinkham M.A.
        Interpreting change scores of tests and measures used in physical therapy.
        Phys Ther. 2006; 86: 735-743
        • Norman G.R.
        • Sloan J.A.
        • Wyrwich K.W.
        Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation.
        Med Care. 2003; 41: 582-592
        • Cattaneo D.
        • Jonsdottir J.
        • Repetti S.
        Reliability of four scales on balance disorders in persons with multiple sclerosis.
        Disabil Rehabil. 2007; 29: 1920-1925
        • Baert I.
        • Freeman J.
        • Smedal T.
        • et al.
        Responsiveness and clinically meaningful improvement, according to disability level, of five walking measures after rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis: a European multicenter study.
        Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2014; 28: 621-631
        • Beninato M.
        • Gill-Body K.M.
        • Salles S.
        • Stark P.C.
        • Black-Schaffer R.M.
        • Stein J.
        Determination of the minimal clinically important difference in the FIM instrument in patients with stroke.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006; 87: 32-39

      Linked Article

      • Minimal Clinically Important Difference of Berg Balance Scale in People With Multiple Sclerosis
        Archives of Physical Medicine and RehabilitationVol. 100Issue 6
        • Preview
          We have read the article of Gervasoni et al,1 “Minimal Clinically Important Difference of Berg Balance Scale in People With Multiple Sclerosis,” with great interest and hope. This study is important for the field of neurological rehabilitation, due to determined minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the Berg Balance Scale, which is commonly used in patients with multiple sclerosis. While we value the reported clinical results, we are concerned by the unclear methods section.
        • Full-Text
        • PDF