Advertisement
Departments Letter to the Editor| Volume 100, ISSUE 6, P1191, June 2019

Minimal Clinically Important Difference of Berg Balance Scale in People With Multiple Sclerosis

      We have read the article of Gervasoni et al,
      • Gervasoni E.
      • Jonsdottir J.
      • Montesano A.
      • Cattaneo D.
      Minimal clinically important difference of Berg Balance Scale in people with multiple sclerosis.
      “Minimal Clinically Important Difference of Berg Balance Scale in People With Multiple Sclerosis,” with great interest and hope. This study is important for the field of neurological rehabilitation, due to determined minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the Berg Balance Scale, which is commonly used in patients with multiple sclerosis. While we value the reported clinical results, we are concerned by the unclear methods section.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Gervasoni E.
        • Jonsdottir J.
        • Montesano A.
        • Cattaneo D.
        Minimal clinically important difference of Berg Balance Scale in people with multiple sclerosis.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017; 98: 337-340
        • Beaton D.E.
        • Bombardier C.
        • Katz J.N.
        • et al.
        Looking for important change/differences in studies of responsiveness. OMERACT MCID Working Group. Outcome measures in rheumatology. Minimal clinically important difference.
        J Rheumatol. 2001; 28: 400-405
        • Guyatt G.H.
        • Osoba D.
        • Wu A.W.
        • Wyrwich K.W.
        • Norman G.R.
        Clinical Significance Consensus Meeting Group. Methods to explain the clinical significance of health status measures.
        Mayo Clin Proc. 2002; 77: 371-383
        • Gunn H.
        • Markevics S.
        • Haas B.
        • Marsden J.
        • Freeman J.
        Systematic review: the effectiveness of interventions to reduce falls and improve balance in adults with multiple sclerosis.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015; 96: 1898-1912

      Linked Article