Advertisement

Level of Effort and 3 Hour Rule Compliance

Published:February 20, 2019DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2019.01.014

      Abstract

      Objective

      To determine if patients’ level of effort (LOE) in therapy sessions during traumatic brain injury (TBI) rehabilitation modifies the effect of compliance with the 3-Hour Rule of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.

      Design

      Propensity score methodology applied to the TBI Practice-Based Evidence database, consisting of multisite, prospective, longitudinal observational data.

      Setting

      Acute inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRF).

      Participants

      Patients (N=1820) who received their first IRF admission for TBI in the United States and were enrolled for 3- and 9-month follow-up.

      Main Outcome Measures

      Participation Assessment with Recombined Tools-Objective-17, FIM Motor and Cognitive scores, Satisfaction with Life Scale, and Patient Health Questionnaire-9.

      Results

      When the full cohort was examined, no strong main effect of compliance with the 3-Hour Rule was identified and LOE did not modify the effect of compliance with the 3-Hour Rule. In contrast, LOE had a strong positive main effect on all outcomes, except depression. When the sample was stratified by level of disability, LOE modified the effect of compliance, particularly on the outcomes of participants with less severe disability. For these patients, providing 3 hours of therapy for 50% or more of therapy days in the context of low effort resulted in poorer performance on select outcome measures at discharge and up to 9 months postdischarge compared to patients with <50% of 3-hour therapy days.

      Conclusions

      LOE is an active ingredient in inpatient TBI rehabilitation, while compliance with the 3-Hour Rule was not found to have a substantive effect on the outcomes. The results support matching time in therapy during acute TBI rehabilitation to patients’ LOE in order to optimize long-term benefits on outcomes.

      Keywords

      List of abbreviations:

      ASD (absolute standardized difference), CI (confidence interval), CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services), IPW (inverse probability weighting), IRF (inpatient rehabilitation facility), LOE (level of effort), LOS (length of stay), OT (occupational therapy), PART-O (Participation Assessment with Recombined Tools-Objective), POC (point of care), PT (physical therapy), ST (speech therapy), SWLS (Satisfaction with Life Scale), TBI (traumatic brain injury), TBI-PBE (Traumatic Brain Injury Practice-Based Evidence)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Medicare Learning Network
        Inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) medical review changes.
        MLN Matters. 2017; : SE17036
        • Johnston M.V.
        • Miller L.S.
        Cost-effectiveness of the Medicare three-hour regulation.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1986; 67: 581-585
        • Turner-Stokes L.
        • Pick A.
        • Nair A.
        • Disler P.B.
        • Wade D.T.
        Multi-disciplinary rehabilitation for acquired brain injury in adults of working age.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015; : CD004170
        • Konigs M.
        • Beurskens E.A.
        • Snoep L.
        • Scherder E.J.
        • Oosterlaan J.
        Effects of timing and intensity of neurorehabilitation on functional outcome after traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018; 99: 1149-1159.e1
        • Wang H.
        • Camicia M.
        • Terdiman J.
        • Mannava M.K.
        • Sidney S.
        • Sandel M.E.
        Daily treatment time and functional gains of stroke patients during inpatient rehabilitation.
        PM R. 2013; 5: 122-128
        • Nagai S.
        • Sonoda S.
        • Miyai I.
        • et al.
        Relationship between the intensity of stroke rehabilitation and outcome: a survey conducted by the Kaifukuki rehabilitation ward association in Japan (second report).
        Jpn J Compr Rehabil Sci. 2011; 2: 77-81
        • Horn S.D.
        • Corrigan J.D.
        • Beaulieu C.L.
        • et al.
        Traumatic brain injury patient, injury, therapy, and ancillary treatments associated with outcomes at discharge and 9 months postdischarge.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015; 96: S304-S329
        • Pegg P.
        • Auerbach S.
        • Seel R.
        • Buenaver L.
        • Kiesler D.
        • Plybon L.
        The impact of patient-center information on patients' treatment satisfaction and outcomes in traumatic brain injury rehabilitation.
        Rehabil Psychol. 2005; 50: 366-374
        • Bode R.K.
        • Heinemann A.W.
        • Semik P.
        • Mallinson T.
        Relative importance of rehabilitation therapy characteristics on functional outcomes for persons with stroke.
        Stroke. 2004; 35: 2537-2542
        • Seel R.T.
        • Corrigan J.D.
        • Dijkers M.P.
        • et al.
        Patient effort in traumatic brain injury inpatient rehabilitation: course and associations with age, brain injury severity, and time postinjury.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015; 96: S235-S244
        • Horn S.D.
        • Corrigan J.D.
        • Bogner J.
        • et al.
        Traumatic Brain Injury-Practice Based Evidence study: design and patients, centers, treatments, and outcomes.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015; 96: S178-S196.e15
        • Seel R.T.
        • Barrett R.S.
        • Beaulieu C.L.
        • et al.
        Institutional variation in traumatic brain injury acute rehabilitation practice.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015; 96: S197-S208
        • Heinemann A.W.
        • Linacre J.M.
        • Wright B.D.
        • Hamilton B.B.
        • Granger C.
        Relationships between impairment and physical disability as measured by the Functional Independence Measure.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993; 74: 566-573
        • Whiteneck G.G.
        • Dijkers M.P.
        • Heinemann A.W.
        • et al.
        Development of the participation assessment with recombined tools-objective for use after traumatic brain injury.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011; 92: 542-551
        • Bogner J.A.
        • Whiteneck G.G.
        • Corrigan J.D.
        • Lai J.S.
        • Dijkers M.P.
        • Heinemann A.W.
        Comparison of scoring methods for the participation assessment with recombined tools-objective.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011; 92: 552-563
        • Malec J.F.
        • Whiteneck G.G.
        • Bogner J.A.
        Another look at the PART-O using the Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems national database: Scoring to optimize psychometrics.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016; 97: 211-217
        • Linacre J.M.
        • Heinemann A.W.
        • Wright B.D.
        • Granger C.V.
        • Hamilton B.B.
        The structure and stability of the functional independence measure.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994; 75: 127-132
        • Kroenke K.
        • Spitzer R.L.
        • Williams J.B.
        The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure.
        J Gen Intern Med. 2001; 16: 606-613
        • Fann J.R.
        • Bombardier C.H.
        • Dikmen S.
        • et al.
        Validity of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 in assessing depression following traumatic brain injury.
        J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2005; 20: 501-511
        • Diener E.
        • Emmons R.A.
        • Larsen R.J.
        • Griffin S.
        The satisfaction with life scale.
        J Pers Assess. 1985; 49: 71-75
        • Hamilton B.B.
        • Laughlin J.A.
        • Fiedler R.C.
        • Granger C.V.
        Interrater reliability of the 7-level Functional Independence Measure (FIM).
        Scand J Rehabil Med. 1994; 26: 115-119
        • Pavot W.
        • Diener E.
        • Colvin C.R.
        • Sandvik E.
        Further validation of the satisfaction with life scale: Evidence for the cross-method convergence of well-being measures.
        J Pers Assess. 1991; 57: 149-161
        • Williams R.T.
        • Heinemann A.W.
        • Neumann H.D.
        • et al.
        Evaluating the psychometric properties and responsiveness to change of 3 depression measures in a sample of persons with traumatic spinal cord injury and major depressive disorder.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016; 97: 929-937
        • Austin P.C.
        • Stuart E.A.
        Moving towards best practice when using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using the propensity score to estimate causal treatment effects in observational studies.
        Stat Med. 2015; 34: 3661-3679
        • Whyte J.
        • Hart T.
        It's more than a black box; it's a Russian doll: defining rehabilitation treatments.
        Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2003; 82: 639-652