Advertisement
Original research| Volume 100, ISSUE 2, P327-335, February 2019

Implementation of Pressure Injury Prevention Best Practices Across 6 Canadian Rehabilitation Sites: Results From the Spinal Cord Injury Knowledge Mobilization Network

Published:November 09, 2018DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2018.07.444

      Abstract

      Objective

      To use the theoretical frameworks of implementation science to implement pressure injury (PI) prevention best practices in spinal cord injury (SCI) rehabilitation.

      Design

      Quality improvement.

      Setting

      Six Canadian SCI rehabilitation centers.

      Participants

      Inpatients (N=2371) admitted from 2011 to 2015.

      Interventions

      The SCI Knowledge Mobilization Network (SCI KMN) selected and implemented 2 PI prevention best practices at 6 Canadian SCI rehabilitation centers: (1) completing a comprehensive PI risk assessment comprised of a structured risk assessment instrument followed by an individualized, interprofessional risk factor determination and prevention plan; and (2) providing structured and individualized PI prevention patient education. Active Implementation Frameworks provided a systematic approach to best practice implementation.

      Main Outcome Measures

      Implementation indicators (completion rates) and patient outcomes (PI incidence, patient education survey).

      Results

      After implementation, risk assessment completion rates improved from 46% to 94% (P<.05). Between initial (2012-2013) and full (2014-2015) implementation stages, completion rates improved for both interprofessional risk factor determination (67% to 96%) and prevention plans (67% to 94%). Documentation of patient education also increased to 86% (vs. 71% preimplementation). At rehabilitation admission 22% of patients had PIs, with 14% of individuals developing new PIs during rehabilitation. The overall PI prevalence was 30%. Considering only PIs of stage 2 or greater, prevalence was 21% and incidence 7%. There were no statistically significant differences in PI incidence between pre- and postimplementation. Patient education surveys indicated that PI education improved patients’ knowledge of prevention strategies.

      Conclusions

      Active Implementation Frameworks supported successful implementation of PI prevention best practices across the 6 participating SCI KMN sites. Achieving a reduction in PI incidence will require additional measures, and there is an ongoing need to strengthen the evidence base underpinning PI prevention guidelines.

      Keywords

      List of abbreviations:

      FMC (Foothills Medical Centre), GRH (Glenrose Rehabilitation Hospital), IRDLM (Institut de Réadaptation Gingras-Lindsay-de-Montréal), IRDPQ (Institut de Réadaptation en Déficience de Physique de Québec), IRGLM (Institut de Réadaptation Gingras Lindsay-de-Montréal), NIRN (National Implementation Research Network), PI (pressure injury), PI-SJHC (Parkwood Institute—St. Joseph’s Health Centre), SCI (spinal cord-injury), SCI KMN (Spinal Cord Injury Knowledge Mobilization Network), SCIPUS (Spinal Cord Injury Pressure Ulcer Scale), TRI-UHN (Toronto Rehabilitation Institute—University Health Network)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Chaudoir S.R.
        • Dugan A.G.
        • Barr C.H.
        Measuring factors affecting implementation of health innovations: a systematic review of structural, organizational, provider, patient, and innovation level measures.
        Implement Sci. 2013; 8: 22
        • Balas E.A.
        • Boren S.A.
        Managing clinical knowledge for health care improvement.
        in: Bemmel J. McCray A.T. Yearbook of medical informatics 2000: patient-centered systems. Schattauer Verlagsgesellschaft mbH, Stuttgart, Germany2000: 65-70
        • Morris Z.S.
        • Wooding S.
        • Grant J.
        The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research.
        J R Soc Med. 2011; 104: 510-520
        • Committee on Quality of Health Care in America and Institute of Medicine
        Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century.
        National Academies Press, Washington, DC2001
        • Burns S.P.
        • Nelson A.L.
        • Bosshart H.T.
        • et al.
        Implementation of clinical practice guidelines for prevention of thromboembolism in spinal cord injury.
        J Spinal Cord Med. 2005; 28: 33-42
        • Goetz L.L.
        • Nelson A.L.
        • Guihan M.
        • et al.
        Provider adherence to implementation of clinical practice guidelines for neurogenic bowel in adults with spinal cord injury.
        J Spinal Cord Med. 2005; 28: 394-406
        • Guihan M.
        • Bosshart H.T.
        • Nelson A.
        Lessons learned in implementing SCI clinical practice guidelines.
        SCI Nurs. 2004; 21: 136-142
        • Clarke H.F.
        • Bradley C.
        • Whytock S.
        • Handfield S.
        • van der Wal R.
        • Gundry S.
        Pressure ulcers: implementation of evidence-based nursing practice.
        J Adv Nurs. 2005; 49: 578-590
        • de Groot S.
        • Bevers G.
        • Post M.W.
        • Woldring F.A.
        • Mulder D.G.
        • van der Woude L.H.
        Effect and process evaluation of implementing standardized tests to monitor patients in spinal cord injury rehabilitation.
        Disabil Rehabil. 2010; 32: 588-597
        • Oxman A.D.
        • Thomson M.A.
        • Davis D.A.
        • Haynes R.B.
        No magic bullets: a systematic review of 102 trials of interventions to improve professional practice.
        CMAJ. 1995; 153: 1423-1431
        • Noonan V.K.
        • Wolfe D.L.
        • Thorogood N.P.
        • et al.
        Knowledge translation and implementation in spinal cord injury: a systematic review.
        Spinal Cord. 2014; 52: 578-587
        • Fixsen D.L.
        • Naoom S.F.
        • Blase K.A.
        • Friedman R.M.
        • Wallace F.
        Implementation research: a synthesis of the literature.
        University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, The National Implementation Research Network, Tampa2005
        • Ogden T.
        • Bjornebekk G.
        • Kjobli J.
        • et al.
        Measurement of implementation components ten years after a nationwide introduction of empirically supported programs--a pilot study.
        Implement Sci. 2012; 7: 49
        • Damschroder L.J.
        • Aron D.C.
        • Keith R.E.
        • Kirsh S.R.
        • Alexander J.A.
        • Lowery J.C.
        Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science.
        Implement Sci. 2009; 4: 50
        • Nilsen P.
        Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks.
        Implement Sci. 2015; 10: 53
        • Bauer M.S.
        • Damschroder L.
        • Hagedorn H.
        • Smith J.
        • Kilbourne A.M.
        An introduction to implementation science for the non-specialist.
        BMC Psychol. 2015; 3: 32
        • Brown J.
        • Mumme L.
        • Guy S.D.
        • et al.
        Informing implementation: a practical guide to implementing new practice as informed by the experiences of the SCI KMN.
        (Available at:) (Accessed January 12, 2018)
        • Duda M.A.
        • Riopelle R.J.
        • Brown J.
        From theory to practice: an illustrative case for selecting evidence-based practices and building implementation capacity in three Canadian health jurisdictions.
        Evid Policy. 2014; 10: 565-577
        • Scovil C.Y.
        • Flett H.M.
        • McMillan L.T.
        • et al.
        The application of implementation science for pressure ulcer prevention best practices in an inpatient spinal cord injury rehabilitation program.
        J Spinal Cord Med. 2014; 37: 589-597
        • Fixsen D.
        • Blase K.
        • Naoom S.
        • Duda M.
        Implementation drivers: assessing best practices.
        University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC2013
        • Hopkins A.
        • Dealey C.
        • Bale S.
        • Defloor T.
        • Worboys F.
        Patient stories of living with a pressure ulcer.
        J Adv Nurs. 2006; 56: 345-353
        • Jackson J.
        • Carlson M.
        • Rubayi S.
        • et al.
        Qualitative study of principles pertaining to lifestyle and pressure ulcer risk in adults with spinal cord injury.
        Disabil Rehabil. 2010; 32: 567-578
        • Langemo D.K.
        • Melland H.
        • Hanson D.
        • Olson B.
        • Hunter S.
        The lived experience of having a pressure ulcer: a qualitative analysis.
        Adv Skin Wound Care. 2000; 13: 225-235
        • Bennett G.
        • Dealey C.
        • Posnett J.
        The cost of pressure ulcers in the UK.
        Age Ageing. 2004; 33: 230-235
        • Chan B.C.
        • Nanwa N.
        • Mittmann N.
        • Bryant D.
        • Coyte P.C.
        • Houghton P.E.
        The average cost of pressure ulcer management in a community dwelling spinal cord injury population.
        Int Wound J. 2013; 10: 431-440
        • Mittmann N.
        • Chan B.C.
        • Craven B.C.
        • Isogai P.K.
        • Houghton P.
        Evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of electrical stimulation therapy for pressure ulcers in spinal cord injury.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011; 92: 866-872
        • Pancorbo-Hidalgo P.L.
        • Garcia-Fernandez F.P.
        • Lopez-Medina I.M.
        • Alvarez-Nieto C.
        Risk assessment scales for pressure ulcer prevention: a systematic review.
        J Adv Nurs. 2006; 54: 94-110
        • Byrne D.W.
        • Salzberg C.A.
        Major risk factors for pressure ulcers in the spinal cord disabled: a literature review.
        Spinal Cord. 1996; 34: 255-263
        • Redelings M.D.
        • Lee N.E.
        • Sorvillo F.
        Pressure ulcers: more lethal than we thought?.
        Adv Skin Wound Care. 2005; 18: 367-372
        • Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
        Medicare program: changes to the hospital inpatient prospective payment systems and fiscal year 2009 rates; payments for graduate medical education in certain emergency situations; changes to disclosure of physician ownership in hospitals and physician self-referral rules; updates to the long-term care prospective payment system; updates to certain IPPS-excluded hospitals; and collection of information regarding financial relationships between hospitals.
        Final rules. Fed Regist. 2008; 73: 48433-49084
        • Berlowitz D.
        • VanDeusen Lukas C.
        • Parker V.
        • et al.
        • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
        Preventing pressure ulcers in hospitals: a toolkit for improving quality of care 2011.
        (Available at:) (Accessed September 9, 2016)
        • Nguyen K.H.
        • Chaboyer W.
        • Whitty J.A.
        Pressure injury in Australian public hospitals: a cost-of-illness study.
        Aust Health Rev. 2015; 39: 329-336
        • Saliba D.
        • Rubenstein L.V.
        • Simon B.
        • et al.
        Adherence to pressure ulcer prevention guidelines: implications for nursing home quality.
        J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003; 51: 56-62
        • Sharp C.
        • Burr G.
        • Broadbent M.
        • Cummins M.
        • Casey H.
        • Merriman A.
        Pressure ulcer prevention and care: a survey of current practice.
        J Qual Clin Pract. 2000; 20: 150-157
        • Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine
        Pressure ulcer prevention and treatment following spinal cord injury: a clinical practice guideline for health-care professionals.
        J Spinal Cord Med. 2001; 24: S40-S101
        • Houghton P.E.
        • Campbell K.E.
        • CPG Panel
        Canadian best practice guidelines for the prevention and management of pressure ulcers in people with spinal cord injury.
        (Available at:) (Acccessed January 12, 2018)
        • Regan M.
        • Teasell R.W.
        • Keast D.
        • Aubut J.L.
        • Foulon B.L.
        • Mehta S.
        Pressure ulcers following spinal cord injury.
        in: Eng J.J. Teasell R.W. Miller W.C. Wolfe D.L. Townson A.F. Hsieh J.T.C. Connolly S.J. Mehta S. Sakakibara B.M. Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Evidence. Version 3.0. 2010 (Available at:) (Accessed December 18, 2018)
        • Craven B.C.
        • Verrier M.C.
        • Balioussis C.
        • et al.
        Rehabilitation environmental scan atlas: capturing capacity in Canadian SCI rehabilitation 2012.
        (Available at:) (Accessed January 12, 2018)
        • Blase K.
        • Van Dyke M.K.
        • Fixsen D.L.
        • Wallace F.B.
        Implementation science: key concepts, themes, and evidence for practitioners in educational psychology.
        in: Perkins B.K. Handbook of implementation science for psychology in education. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY2012: 13-34
        • Bergstrom N.
        • Braden B.J.
        • Laguzza A.
        • Holman V.
        The Braden Scale for predicting pressure sore risk.
        Nurs Res. 1987; 36: 205-210
        • Salzberg C.A.
        • Byrne D.W.
        • Cayten C.G.
        • van Niewerburgh P.
        • Murphy J.G.
        • Viehbeck M.
        A new pressure ulcer risk assessment scale for individuals with spinal cord injury.
        Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1996; 75: 96-104
      1. Black J, Baharestani M, Cuddigan J, et al. National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel’s updated pressure ulcer staging system. Dermatol Nurs 2007;19:343-9; quiz 50.

        • Chen Y.
        • Devivo M.J.
        • Jackson A.B.
        Pressure ulcer prevalence in people with spinal cord injury: age-period-duration effects.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005; 86: 1208-1213
        • Scheel-Sailer A.
        • Wyss A.
        • Boldt C.
        • Post M.W.
        • Lay V.
        Prevalence, location, grade of pressure ulcers and association with specific patient characteristics in adult spinal cord injury patients during the hospital stay: a prospective cohort study.
        Spinal Cord. 2013; 51: 828-833
        • Helfrich C.D.
        • Damschroder L.J.
        • Hagedorn H.J.
        • et al.
        A critical synthesis of literature on the promoting action on research implementation in health services (PARIHS) framework.
        Implement Sci. 2010; 5: 82
        • Graham I.D.
        • Logan J.
        • Harrison M.B.
        • et al.
        Lost in knowledge translation: time for a map?.
        J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2006; 26: 13-24
      2. Golden B. Transforming healthcare organizations. Healthc Q 2006; 10 Spec No:10-9, 4.

        • Ash D.
        An exploration of the occurrence of pressure ulcers in a British spinal injuries unit.
        J Clin Nurs. 2002; 11: 470-478
        • Chen D.
        • Apple Jr., D.F.
        • Hudson L.M.
        • Bode R.
        Medical complications during acute rehabilitation following spinal cord injury--current experience of the Model Systems.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999; 80: 1397-1401
        • DeJong G.
        • Hsieh C.H.
        • Brown P.
        • et al.
        Factors associated with pressure ulcer risk in spinal cord injury rehabilitation.
        Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2014; 93: 971-986
        • New P.W.
        • Rawicki H.B.
        • Bailey M.J.
        Nontraumatic spinal cord injury rehabilitation: pressure ulcer patterns, prediction, and impact.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004; 85: 87-93
        • Wang H.
        • Niewczyk P.
        • Divita M.
        • et al.
        Impact of pressure ulcers on outcomes in inpatient rehabilitation facilities.
        Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2014; 93: 207-216
        • Delparte J.J.
        • Scovil C.Y.
        • Flett H.M.
        • Higgins J.
        • Laramee M.T.
        • Burns A.S.
        Psychometric properties of the Spinal Cord Injury Pressure Ulcer Scale (SCIPUS) for pressure ulcer risk assessment during inpatient rehabilitation.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015; 96: 1980-1985
        • Krishnan S.
        • Brick R.S.
        • Karg P.E.
        • et al.
        Predictive validity of the Spinal Cord Injury Pressure Ulcer Scale (SCIPUS) in acute care and inpatient rehabilitation in individuals with traumatic spinal cord injury.
        NeuroRehabilitation. 2016; 38: 401-409