Advertisement
Review article (meta-analysis)| Volume 100, ISSUE 2, P350-365, February 2019

Effectiveness of Nonsurgical Interventions for Managing Adhesive Capsulitis in Patients With Diabetes: A Systematic Review

Published:September 27, 2018DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2018.08.181

      Abstract

      Objective

      This systematic review evaluated the effectiveness of nonsurgical interventions for managing adhesive capsulitis (AC) in patients with diabetes on pain, function, and range of motion.

      Data Sources

      MEDLINE and other databases were searched for studies published in the last 20 years.

      Study Selection

      Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that assessed AC in people with diabetes and implemented 1 or a combination of physiotherapeutic interventions, corticosteroids, and manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) were eligible for inclusion.

      Data Extraction

      The Cochrane Risk of Bias was used by 2 independent raters who met to achieve consensus. The quality of trials was assessed using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations. Data extracted from the eligible studies included study design, participant characteristics and duration of symptoms, type of intervention, outcome measures, follow-up intervals, and research findings.

      Data Synthesis

      Because of the lack of similar interventions, a narrative synthesis was conducted, and meta-analyses were not performed. The effect sizes or between-group differences of the interventions were reported. A total of 8 RCTs met the inclusion criteria: 4 addressed physiotherapeutic interventions, 3 corticosteroid injections, and 1 MUA. The effect sizes for physiotherapeutic interventions were 0.8-2.0, 0.9-2.0, and 1.0 for ROM, function, and pain, respectively, with the largest effect size (2.0) being reported for joint mobilization plus exercises. The effect sizes for corticosteroids were 0.2-0.5 and 0.1 for ROM and pain. The between-group improvement for MUA was 5.6 points on Constant Shoulder Score.

      Conclusion

      Low-quality evidence suggests large effects of joint mobilization plus exercises on AC in people with diabetes, although confidence in this conclusion is limited due to the high risk of bias. Even weaker support was available for corticosteroid and MUA. Future high-quality RCTs are needed to determine the best intervention for managing AC in patients with diabetes.

      Keywords

      List of abbreviations:

      AC (adhesive capsulitis), ASES (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons), CSS (Constant Shoulder Score), GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation), MUA (manipulation under anesthesia), NSAID (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug), RCT (randomized controlled trial), ROM (range of motion), SPADI (Shoulder Pain and Disability Index), SRM (standardized response mean), VAS (visual analog scale)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Hsu C.L.
        • Sheu W.H.
        Diabetes and shoulder disorders.
        J Diabetes Investig. 2016; 7: 649-651
        • Juel N.G.
        • Brox J.I.
        • Brunborg C.
        • Holte K.B.
        • Berg T.J.
        Very high prevalence of frozen shoulder in patients with type 1 diabetes of ≥45 years’ duration: the Dialong Shoulder Study.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017; 98: 1551-1559
        • Larkin M.E.
        • Barnie A.
        • Braffett B.H.
        • et al.
        Musculoskeletal complications in type 1 diabetes.
        Diabetes Care. 2014; 37: 1863-1869
        • Zreik N.H.
        • Malik R.A.
        • Charalambous C.P.
        Adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder and diabetes: a meta-analysis of prevalence.
        Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2016; 6: 26
        • Arkkila P.E.
        • Gautier J.-F.
        Musculoskeletal disorders in diabetes mellitus: an update.
        Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2003; 17: 945-970
        • Huang Y.
        • Fann C.
        • Chiu Y.
        • et al.
        Association of diabetes mellitus with the risk of developing adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder: a longitudinal population-based followup study.
        Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2013; 65: 1197-1202
        • Cagliero E.
        • Apruzzese W.
        • Perlmutter G.S.
        • Nathan D.M.
        Musculoskeletal disorders of the hand and shoulder in patients with diabetes mellitus.
        Am J Med. 2002; 112: 487-490
        • Seth A.
        Thawing the frozen shoulder.
        InnovAiT. 2014; 7: 421-427
        • Wong C.K.
        • Levine W.N.
        • Deo K.
        • et al.
        Natural history of frozen shoulder: fact or fiction? A systematic review.
        Physiotherapy. 2017; 103: 40-47
        • Walmsley S.
        • Osmotherly P.G.
        • Rivett D.A.
        Clinical identifiers for early-stage primary/idiopathic adhesive capsulitis: are we seeing the real picture?.
        Phys Ther. 2014; 94: 968-976
        • Diercks R.L.
        • Stevens M.
        Gentle thawing of the frozen shoulder: a prospective study of supervised neglect versus intensive physical therapy in seventy-seven patients with frozen shoulder syndrome followed up for two years.
        J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2004; 13: 499-502
        • Vastamäki H.
        • Ristolainen L.
        • Vastamäki M.
        Range of motion of diabetic frozen shoulder recovers to the contralateral level.
        J Int Med Res. 2016; 44: 1191-1199
        • Blanchard V.
        • Barr S.
        • Cerisola F.L.
        The effectiveness of corticosteroid injections compared with physiotherapeutic interventions for adhesive capsulitis: a systematic review.
        Physiotherapy. 2010; 96: 95-107
        • Favejee M.M.
        • Huisstede B.M.
        • Koes B.W.
        Frozen shoulder: the effectiveness of conservative and surgical interventions—systematic review.
        Br J Sports Med. 2011; 45: 49-56
        • Grant J.A.
        • Schroeder N.
        • Miller B.S.
        • Carpenter J.E.
        Comparison of manipulation and arthroscopic capsular release for adhesive capsulitis: a systematic review.
        J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2013; 22: 1135-1145
        • Jain T.K.
        • Sharma N.K.
        The effectiveness of physiotherapeutic interventions in treatment of frozen shoulder/adhesive capsulitis: a systematic review.
        J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2014; 27: 247-273
        • Maund E.
        • Craig D.
        • Suekarran S.
        • et al.
        Management of frozen shoulder: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.
        Health Technol Assess. 2012; 16: 1
        • Uppal H.S.
        • Evans J.P.
        • Smith C.
        Frozen shoulder: a systematic review of therapeutic options.
        World J Orthop. 2015; 6: 263
        • Ji L.
        • Wang H.
        • Cao Y.
        • et al.
        Sharp-hook acupuncture (Feng Gou Zhen) for patients with periarthritis of shoulder: a randomized controlled trial.
        Evidence Based Complement Alternat Med. 2015; 2015: 312309
        • Hand C.
        • Clipsham K.
        • Rees J.L.
        • Carr A.J.
        Long-term outcome of frozen shoulder.
        J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2008; 17: 231-236
        • Cole A.
        • Gill T.K.
        • Shanahan E.M.
        • Phillips P.
        • Taylor A.W.
        • Hill C.L.
        Is diabetes associated with shoulder pain or stiffness? Results from a population based study.
        J Rheumatol. 2009; 36: 371-377
        • Rill B.K.
        • Fleckenstein C.M.
        • Levy M.S.
        • Nagesh V.
        • Hasan S.S.
        Predictors of outcome after nonoperative and operative treatment of adhesive capsulitis.
        Am J Sports Med. 2011; 39: 567-574
        • Bulgen D.Y.
        • Hazleman B.L.
        • Roberts S.
        Frozen shoulder: long-term prospective study.
        Ann Rheum Dis. 1984; 43: 353-360
        • Angst F.
        • Schwyzer H.
        • Aeschlimann A.
        • Simmen B.R.
        • Goldhahn J.
        Measures of adult shoulder function: disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire (DASH) and its short version (QuickDASH), shoulder pain and disability index (SPADI), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) society standardized shoulder.
        Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011; 63: S174-S188
        • Staples M.P.
        • Forbes A.
        • Green S.
        • Buchbinder R.
        Shoulder-specific disability measures showed acceptable construct validity and responsiveness.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 2010; 63: 163-170
        • Tveitå E.K.
        • Ekeberg O.M.
        • Juel N.G.
        • Bautz-Holter E.
        Responsiveness of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index in patients with adhesive capsulitis.
        BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008; 9: 161
        • Kim Y.-S.
        • Lee H.-J.
        • Lee D.-H.
        • Choi K.-Y.
        Comparison of high-and low-dose intra-articular triamcinolone acetonide injection for treatment of primary shoulder stiffness: a prospective randomized trial.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017; 26: 209-215
        • Ekim A.A.
        • İnal E.E.
        • Gönüllü E.
        • et al.
        Continuous passive motion in adhesive capsulitis patients with diabetes mellitus: a randomized controlled trial.
        J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2016; 29: 779-786
        • Youssef A.R.
        • Ibrahim A.M.
        • Ayad K.E.
        Mulligan mobilization is more effective in treating diabetic frozen shoulder than the Maitland technique.
        Int J Physiother. 2015; 2: 804-810
        • Soliman A.S.
        • Mahmoud A.M.
        • Serry Z.M.
        • Dawood F.G.
        Therapeutic effects of low-level laser and reflexology on adhesive capsulitis in elderly type 2 diabetic patients.
        Asian J Pharm Clin Res. 2014; 7: 317-321
        • Dehghan A.
        • Pishgooei N.
        • Salami M.-A.
        • et al.
        Comparison between NSAID and intra-articular corticosteroid injection in frozen shoulder of diabetic patients; a randomized clinical trial.
        Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2013; 121: 75-79
        • Roh Y.H.
        • Yi S.R.
        • Noh J.H.
        • et al.
        Intra-articular corticosteroid injection in diabetic patients with adhesive capsulitis: a randomized controlled trial.
        Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012; 20: 1947-1952
        • Liang Q.
        • Huang K.
        • Wang X.
        • Li Y.
        [Linearly polarized near-infrared irradiation combined with aerothermotherapy for treatment of frozen shoulder in diabetic patients].
        J South Med Univ. 2012; 32 ([Chinese]): 1294-1296
        • Guity M.R.
        • Ghaznavi A.R.
        Manipulation of idiopathic frozen shoulder with and without concomitant intra-articular corticosteroid injection.
        Tehran Univ Med J. 2007; 65: 12-16
        • Higgins J.P.T.
        • Altman D.G.
        • Gøtzsche P.C.
        • et al.
        The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.
        BMJ. 2011; 343: d5928
        • Cohen J.
        Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences.
        1st ed. Academic Press, New York1977
        • Guyatt G.
        • Oxman A.D.
        • Akl E.A.
        • et al.
        GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction—GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 2011; 64: 383-394
        • Guyatt G.H.
        • Oxman A.D.
        • Vist G.
        • et al.
        GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence—study limitations (risk of bias).
        J Clin Epidemiol. 2011; 64: 407-415
        • Guyatt G.H.
        • Oxman A.D.
        • Montori V.
        • et al.
        GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence—publication bias.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 2011; 64: 1277-1282
        • Guyatt G.H.
        • Oxman A.D.
        • Kunz R.
        • et al.
        GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence—indirectness.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 2011; 64: 1303-1310
        • Guyatt G.H.
        • Oxman A.D.
        • Kunz R.
        • et al.
        GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidenced imprecision (random error).
        J Clin Epidemiol. 2011; 64: 1283-1293