Advertisement

Advancing Rehabilitation Practice Through Improved Specification of Interventions

Published:September 26, 2018DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2018.09.110

      Abstract

      Rehabilitation clinicians strive to provide cost-effective, patient-centered care that optimizes outcomes. A barrier to this ideal is the lack of a universal system for describing, or specifying, rehabilitation interventions. Current methods of description vary across disciplines and settings, creating barriers to collaboration, and tend to focus mostly on functional deficits and anticipated outcomes, obscuring connections between clinician behaviors and changes in functioning. The Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System (RTSS) is the result of more than a decade of effort by a multidisciplinary group of rehabilitation clinicians and researchers to develop a theory-based framework to specify rehabilitation interventions. The RTSS describes interventions for treatment components, which consist of a target (functional change brought about as a direct result of treatment), ingredients (actions taken by clinicians to change the target), and a hypothesized mechanism of action, as stated in a treatment theory. The RTSS makes explicit the connections between functional change and clinician behavior, and recognizes the role of patient effort in treatment implementation. In so doing, the RTSS supports clinicians’ efforts to work with their patients to set achievable goals, select appropriate treatments, adjust treatment plans as needed, encourage patient participation in the treatment process, communicate with team members, and translate research findings to clinical care. The RTSS may help both expert and novice clinicians articulate their clinical reasoning processes in ways that benefit treatment planning and clinical education, and may improve the design of clinical documentation systems, leading to more effective justification and reimbursement for services. Interested clinicians are invited to apply the RTSS in their local settings.

      Keywords

      List of abbreviations:

      EMR (electronic medical record), MoA (mechanism of action), PRE (progressive resistance exercise), RTSS (Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • DeJong G.
        Coming to terms with the IMPACT Act of 2014.
        Am J Occup Ther. 2016; 70 (7003090010p1-6)
        • Hart T.
        • Dijkers M.P.
        • Whyte J.
        • et al.
        A theory-driven system for the specification of rehabilitation treatments.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019; 100: 172-180
        • American Physical Therapy Association
        Guide to physical therapist practice 3.0.
        (Available at:) (Accessed January 15, 2018)
        • American Occupational Therapy Association
        Occupational therapy practice framework: domain and process (3rd ed.).
        Am J Occup Ther. 2014; 68: S1-S48
      1. Bulecheck G.M. Butcher H.K. Dochterman J.M. Wagner C. Nursing interventions classification. 6th ed. Elsevier, St. Louis2013
        • van Langeveld S.A.
        • Post M.W.
        • van Asbeck F.W.
        • et al.
        Reliability of a new classification system for mobility and self-care in spinal cord injury rehabilitation: the Spinal Cord Injury-Interventions Classification System.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009; 90: 1229-1236
        • Van Stan J.H.
        • Roy N.
        • Awan S.
        • Stemple J.
        • Hillman R.E.
        A taxonomy of voice therapy.
        Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2015; 24: 101-125
        • Gassaway J.
        • Whiteneck G.
        • Dijkers M.
        Clinical taxonomy development and application in spinal cord injury research: the SCIRehab Project.
        J Spinal Cord Med. 2009; 32: 260-269
        • Horn S.D.
        • Corrigan J.D.
        • Bogner J.
        • et al.
        Traumatic brain injury-practice based evidence study: design and patients, centers, treatments, and outcomes.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015; 96 (.e15): S178-S196
        • Dejong G.
        • Horn S.D.
        • Gassaway J.A.
        • Slavin M.D.
        • Dijkers M.P.
        Toward a taxonomy of rehabilitation interventions: using an inductive approach to examine the “black box” of rehabilitation.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004; 85: 678-686
        • DeJong G.
        • Hsieh C.H.
        • Gassaway J.
        • et al.
        Characterizing rehabilitation services for patients with knee and hip replacement in skilled nursing facilities and inpatient rehabilitation facilities.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009; 90: 1269-1283
        • World Health Organization
        International classification of health interventions (beta 2017).
        (Available at:) (Accessed January 15, 2018)
        • Hart T.
        • Tsaousides T.
        • Zanca J.M.
        • et al.
        Toward a theory-driven classification of rehabilitation treatments.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014; 95: S33-S44.e2
        • Dijkers M.P.
        • Ferraro M.K.
        • Hart T.
        • Packel A.
        • Whyte J.
        • Zanca J.M.
        Toward a rehabilitation treatment taxonomy: summary of work in progress.
        Phys Ther. 2014; 94: 319-321
        • Keith R.A.
        • Lipsey M.
        The role of theory in rehabilitation assessment, treatment, and outcomes.
        in: Glueckauf R. Sechrest L. Bond G. McDonel E. Improving assessment in rehabilitation and health. Sage Publications, Newbury Park1993: 33-58
        • Johnson-Laird P.N.
        Mental models in cognitive science.
        Cogn Sci. 1980; 4: 71-115
        • Kragel P.A.
        • Koban L.
        • Barrett L.F.
        • Wager T.D.
        Representation, pattern information, and brain signatures: from neurons to neuroimaging.
        Neuron. 2018; 99: 257-273
        • World Health Organization
        International classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF).
        World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland2001
        • Whyte J.
        • Dijkers M.P.
        • Hart T.
        • et al.
        The importance of voluntary behavior in rehabilitation treatment and outcomes.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019; 100: 156-163
        • Robinson J.H.
        • Callister L.C.
        • Berry J.A.
        • Dearing K.A.
        Patient-centered care and adherence: definitions and applications to improve outcomes.
        J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2008; 20: 600-607
        • Guidetti S.
        • Asaba E.
        • Tham K.
        Meaning of context in recapturing self-care after stroke or spinal cord injury.
        Am J Occup Ther. 2009; 63: 323-332
        • Dijkers M.P.
        • Faotto R.M.
        Team size in spinal cord injury inpatient rehabilitation and patient participation in therapy sessions: the SCIRehab project.
        J Spinal Cord Med. 2012; 35: 624-634
        • Kleim J.A.
        • Jones T.A.
        Principles of experience-dependent neural plasticity: implications for rehabilitation after brain damage.
        J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2008; 51: S225-S239
        • Bettger J.P.
        • Nguyen V.Q.
        • Thomas J.G.
        • et al.
        Turning data into information opportunities to advance rehabilitation quality, research and policy.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018; 99: 1226-1231
        • Van Stan J.H.
        • Dijkers M.P.
        • Hart T.
        • et al.
        The Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System: implications for improvements in research design, reporting, and synthesis.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019; 100: 146-155
        • Hart T.
        • Whyte J.
        • Dijkers M.
        • et al.
        Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System Manual (version 6.2).
        (Available at:) (Accessed August 27, 2018)
      2. Physical, Occupational, and Speech Therapy Services.
        (Available at:) (Accessed January 15, 2018)