Advertisement
Review article (meta-analysis)| Volume 100, ISSUE 6, P1131-1139.e87, June 2019

Download started.

Ok

Benchmarks of Significant Change After Aphasia Rehabilitation

  • Natalie Gilmore
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author Natalie Gilmore, MS, CCC-SLP, Aphasia Research Laboratory, Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Sargent College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Boston University, Room 326, 635 Commonwealth Ave, Boston, MA 02215.
    Affiliations
    Aphasia Research Laboratory, Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Sargent College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Michaela Dwyer
    Affiliations
    Aphasia Research Laboratory, Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Sargent College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Swathi Kiran
    Affiliations
    Aphasia Research Laboratory, Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Sargent College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA
    Search for articles by this author
Published:September 18, 2018DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2018.08.177

      Abstract

      Objective

      To establish benchmarks of significant change for aphasia rehabilitation outcome measures (ie, Western Aphasia Battery-Aphasia Quotient [WAB-AQ], Communicative Effectiveness Index [CETI], Boston Naming Test [BNT]) and assess if those benchmarks significantly differ across subgroups (ie, time post onset, dose frequency, treatment type).

      Data Sources

      A comprehensive literature search of 12 databases, reference lists of previous reviews, and evidence-based practice materials was conducted.

      Study Selection

      Randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental studies, single-subject design, and case studies that used a standardized outcome measure to assess change were included. Titles and full-text articles were screened using a dual review process. Seventy-eight studies met criteria for inclusion.

      Data Extraction

      Data were extracted independently, and 25% of extractions were checked for reliability. All included studies were assigned quality indicator ratings and an evidence level.

      Data Synthesis

      Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted separately for each study design group (ie, within-/between-group comparisons). For within-group designs, the summary effect size after aphasia rehabilitation was 5.03 points (95% confidence interval, 3.95-6.10, P<.001) on the WAB-AQ, 10.37 points (6.08-14.66, P<.001) on the CETI, and 3.30 points (2.43-4.18, P<.001) on the BNT. For between-group designs, the summary effect size was 5.05 points (1.64-8.46, P=.004) on the WAB-AQ and 0.55 points (-1.33 to 2.43, P=.564) on the BNT, the latter of which was not significant. Subgroup analyses for the within-group designs showed no significant differences in the summary effect size as a function of dose frequency or treatment type.

      Conclusions

      This study established benchmarks of significant change on 3 standardized outcome measures used in aphasia rehabilitation.

      Keywords

      List of abbreviations:

      ASHA (American Speech-Language-Hearing Association), BNT (Boston Naming Test), CI (confidence interval), CETI (Communicative Effectiveness Index), COS (core outcome set), ES (effect size), PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses), QOL (quality of life), SEM (standard error of measurement), WAB-AQ (Western Aphasia Battery-Aphasia Quotient)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Dickey L.
        • Kagan A.
        • Lindsay M.P.
        • Fang J.
        • Rowland A.
        • Black S.
        Incidence and profile of inpatient stroke-induced aphasia in Ontario, Canada.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010; 91: 196-202
        • Robey R.R.
        A meta-analysis of clinical outcomes in the treatment of aphasia.
        J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1998; 41: 172-187
        • Brady M.C.
        • Kelly H.
        • Godwin J.
        • Enderby P.
        • Campbell P.
        Speech and language therapy for aphasia following stroke.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016; : CD000425
        • Robey R.
        The efficacy of treatment for aphasic persons: a meta-analysis.
        Brain Lang. 1994; 47: 582-608
        • Robey R.
        • Schultz M.
        • Crawford A.
        • Sinner C.
        Review: single-subject clinical-outcome research: designs, data, effect sizes, and analyses.
        Aphasiology. 1999; 13: 445-473
        • Kertesz A.
        Western Aphasia Battery-Revised.
        The Psychological Corporation, San Antonio2006
      1. Borenstein M. Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Chichester, United Kingdom2009
        • Harvill L.M.
        Standard error of measurement.
        Educ Meas Issues Pract. 1991; 10: 33-41
        • Wallace S.J.
        • Worrall L.
        • Rose T.
        • Le Dorze G.
        Measuring outcomes in aphasia research: a review of current practice and an agenda for standardisation.
        Aphasiology. 2014; 28: 1364-1384
        • Hesketh A.
        • Hopcutt B.
        Outcome measures for aphasia therapy: it’s not what you do, it’s the way that you measure it.
        Eur J Disord Commun. 1997; 32: 189-202
        • Worrall L.
        • Egan J.
        A survey of outcome measures used by Australian speech pathologists.
        Asia Pac J Speech Lang Hear. 2001; 6: 149-162
        • Simmons-Mackie N.
        • Threats T.T.
        • Kagan A.
        Outcome assessment in aphasia: a survey.
        J Commun Disord. 2005; 38: 1-27
        • Ali M.
        • English C.
        • Bernhardt J.
        • Sunnerhagen K.S.
        • Brady M.
        • VISTA-Rehab Collaboration
        More outcomes than trials: a call for consistent data collection across stroke rehabilitation trials: Review.
        Int J Stroke. 2013; 8: 18-24
        • Wallace S.J.
        • Worrall L.
        • Rose T.
        • et al.
        Which outcomes are most important to people with aphasia and their families? An international nominal group technique study framed within the ICF.
        Disabil Rehabil. 2017; 39: 1364-1379
        • Wallace S.J.
        • Worrall L.
        • Rose T.
        • Le Dorze G.
        Which treatment outcomes are most important to aphasia clinicians and managers? An international e-Delphi consensus study.
        Aphasiology. 2017; 31: 643-673
        • Wallace S.J.
        • Worrall L.
        • Rose T.
        • Le Dorze G.
        Core outcomes in aphasia treatment research: an e-Delphi consensus study of international aphasia researchers.
        Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2016; 25: S729-S742
      2. Wallace S, Worrall L, Rose T, Le Dorze G. Improving research outcome measurement in aphasia: development of a core outcome set. Paper presented at: International Aphasia Rehabilitation Conference. December 14, 2016; London.

        • Moher D.
        • Shamseer L.
        • Clarke M.
        • et al.
        Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis protocols (PRISMA-P).
        Syst Rev. 2015; 349: g7647
        • Roy Rosenzweig Center for History and New Media
        Zotero quick start guide.
        (Available at:) (Accessed May 30, 2018)
        • Kostanjsek N.
        Use of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) as a conceptual framework and common language for disability statistics and health information systems.
        BMC Public Health. 2011; 11: S3
        • Kagan A.
        • Simmons-Mackie N.
        • Rowland A.
        • et al.
        Counting what counts: a framework for capturing real-life outcomes of aphasia intervention.
        Aphasiology. 2008; 22: 258-280
        • Lomas J.
        • Pickard L.
        • Bester S.
        • Elbard H.
        • Finlayson A.
        • Zoghaib C.
        The Communicative Effectiveness Index: development and psychometric evaluation of a functional communication measure for adult aphasia.
        J Speech Hear Disord. 1989; 54: 113-124
        • Goodglass H.
        • Kaplan E.
        • Weintraub S.
        Boston Naming Test.
        Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia1983
        • Liu J.
        Statistical power in meta-analysis.
        (Available at:) (Accessed May 30, 2018)
        • Hilari K.
        • Lamping D.L.
        • Smith S.C.
        • Northcott S.
        • Lamb A.
        • Marshall J.
        Psychometric properties of the Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale (SAQOL-39) in a generic stroke population.
        Clin Rehabil. 2009; 23: 544-557
        • Guo Y.E.
        • Togher L.E.
        • Power E.
        • et al.
        Sensitivity to change and responsiveness of the Stroke and Aphasia Quality-of-Life Scale (SAQOL) in a Singapore stroke population.
        Aphasiology. 2017; 31: 427-446
        • Warren S.F.
        • Fey M.E.
        • Yoder P.J.
        Differential treatment intensity research: a missing link to creating optimally effective communication interventions.
        Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2007; 13: 70-77
        • Faroqi-Shah Y.
        • Frymark T.
        • Mullen R.
        • Wang B.
        Effect of treatment for bilingual individuals with aphasia: a systematic review of the evidence.
        NEL J Neurolinguistics. 2010; 23: 319-341
        • Mullen R.
        The state of the evidence: ASHA develops levels of evidence for communication sciences and disorders.
        ASHA Lead. 2007; 12: 8-25
        • American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
        Steps in the process of evidence-based practice: assessing the evidence.
        (Available at:) (Accessed October 4, 2017)
        • SIGN Council
        SIGN 50: a guideline developer’s handbook.
        (Available at:) (Accessed October 4, 2017)
        • Higgins J.P.
        • Green S.
        Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Vol 4. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Chichester2011
        • Laird K.T.
        • Tanner-Smith E.E.
        • Russell A.C.
        • Hollon S.D.
        • Walker L.S.
        Short-term and long-term efficacy of psychological therapies for irritable bowel syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016; 14: 937-947
        • Cherney L.R.
        Oral reading for language in aphasia: Impact of aphasia severity on cross-modal outcomes in chronic nonfluent aphasia.
        Semin Speech Lang. 2010; 31: 42-51
        • Mozeiko J.
        • Coelho C.A.
        • Myers E.B.
        The role of intensity in constraint-induced language therapy for people with chronic aphasia.
        Aphasiology. 2016; 30: 339-363
        • Morris S.B.
        • DeShon R.P.
        Combining effect size estimates in meta-analysis with repeated measures and independent-groups designs.
        Psychol Methods. 2002; 7: 105-125
        • Sterne J.A.
        • Sutton A.J.
        • Ioannidis J.P.
        • et al.
        Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials.
        BMJ. 2011; 343: d4002
        • Portney L.G.
        • Watkins M.P.
        Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice.
        3rd ed. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River2009
        • Beeson P.M.
        • Robey R.R.
        Evaluating single-subject treatment research: lessons learned from the aphasia literature.
        Neuropsychol Rev. 2006; 16: 161-169
        • Elman R.J.
        • Bernstein-Ellis E.
        The efficacy of group communication treatment in adults with chronic aphasia.
        J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1999; 42: 411-419
        • Katz R.C.
        • Wertz R.T.
        The efficacy of computer-provided reading treatment for chronic aphasic adults.
        J Speech Hear Res. 1997; 40: 493-507
        • Hula W.
        • Donovan N.J.
        • Kendall D.L.
        • Gonzalez-Rothi L.J.
        Item response theory analysis of the Western Aphasia Battery.
        Aphasiology. 2010; 24: 1326-1341
        • Flanagan J.L.
        • Jackson S.T.
        Test-retest reliability of three aphasia tests: performance of non-brain-damaged older adults.
        J Commun Disord. 1997; 30: 33-43
        • Moher D.
        • Liberati A.
        • Tetzlaff J.
        • Altman D.G.
        Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.
        PLoS Med. 2009; 6: 6

      Supplemental Appendix S2 References for all included studies

      Included Within Group Studies

        • Aftonomos L.B.
        • Appelbaum J.S.
        • Steele R.D.
        Improving outcomes for persons with aphasia in advanced community-based treatment programs.
        Stroke; a Journal of Cerebral Circulation. 1999; 30: 1370-1379
        • Aftonomos L.B.
        • Steele R.D.
        • Wertz R.T.
        Promoting recovery in chronic aphasia with an interactive technology.
        Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 1997; 78: 841-846
        • Archibald L.M.D.
        • Orange J.B.
        • Jamieson D.J.
        Implementation of computer-based language therapy in aphasia.
        Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders. 2009; 2: 299-311
        • Babbitt E.
        • Worrall L.
        • Cherney L.R.
        Structure, Processes, and Retrospective Outcomes From an Intensive Comprehensive Aphasia Program.
        American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology / American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. 2015; 24: 854-863
        • Bakheit A.M.O.
        • Carrington S.
        • Griffiths S.
        • Searle K.
        High scores on the Western Aphasia Battery correlate with good functional communication skills (as measured with the Communicative Effectiveness Index) in aphasic stroke patients.
        Disability and Rehabilitation: An International, Multidisciplinary Journal. 2005; 27 (): 287-291
        • Ball A.L.
        • de Riesthal M.
        • Breeding V.E.
        • Mendoza D.E.
        Modified ACT and CART in severe aphasia.
        Aphasiology. 2011; 25: 836-848
        • Barthel G.
        • Meinzer M.
        • Djundja D.
        • Rockstroh B.
        Intensive language therapy in chronic aphasia: Which aspects contribute most?.
        Aphasiology. 2008; 22: 408-421
        • Beeson P.M.
        • Rising K.
        • Volk J.
        Writing treatment for severe aphasia: Who benefits?.
        Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. 2003; 46 (): 1038-1060
        • Boles L.
        Conversation analysis as a dependent measure in communication therapy with four individuals with aphasia.
        Asia Pacific Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing. 1997; 2 (19p): 43-61
        • Breier J.I.
        • Maher L.M.
        • Novak B.
        • Papanicolaou A.C.
        Functional Imaging Before and After Constraint-Induced Language Therapy for Aphasia Using Magnetoencephalography.
        Neurocase. 2006; 12: 322-331
        • Brown J.W.
        • Chobor K.L.
        Therapy with a prosthesis for writing in aphasia.
        Aphasiology. 1989; 3: 709-715
        • Cherney L.R.
        Oral reading for language in aphasia: Impact of aphasia severity on cross-modal outcomes in chronic nonfluent aphasia.
        Seminars in Speech and Language. 2010; 31: 42-51
        • Cherney L.R.
        • Halper A.S.
        Novel technology for treating individuals with aphasia and concomitant cognitive deficits.
        Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation. 2008; 15: 542-554
        • Cherney L.R.
        • Halper A.S.
        • Holland A.L.
        • Cole R.
        Computerized script training for aphasia: Preliminary results.
        American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology. 2008; 17: 19-34
        • Code C.
        • Torney A.
        • Gildea-Howardine E.
        • Willmes K.
        Outcome of a one-month therapy intensive for chronic aphasia: Variable individual responses.
        Seminars in Speech and Language. 2010; 31 (): 21-23
        • Doyle P.J.
        • Goldstein H.
        • Bourgeois M.S.
        Experimental analysis of syntax training in Broca’s aphasia: A generalization and social validation study.
        Journal of Speech & Hearing Disorders. 1987; 52 (): 143-155
        • Duncan E.S.
        • Schmah T.
        • Small S.L.
        Performance Variability as a Predictor of Response to Aphasia Treatment.
        Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair. 2016;
        • Edmonds L.A.
        • Kiran S.
        Effect of semantic naming treatment on crosslinguistic generalization in bilingual aphasia.
        Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. 2006; 49: 729-748
        • Edmonds L.A.
        • Nadeau S.E.
        • Kiran S.
        Effect of verb network strengthening treatment (VNeST) on lexical retrieval of content words in sentences in persons with aphasia.
        Aphasiology. 2009; 23: 402-424
        • Edmonds Lisa A.
        • Mammino K.
        • Ojeda J.
        Effect of Verb Network Strengthening Treatment (VNeST) in persons with aphasia: Extension and replication of previous findings.
        American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology. 2014; 23: S312-S329
        • Falconer C.
        • Antonucci S.M.
        Use of semantic feature analysis in group discourse treatment for aphasia: Extension and expansion.
        Aphasiology. 2012; 26: 64-82
        • Faroqi-Shah Y.
        A comparison of two theoretically driven treatments for verb inflection deficits in aphasia.
        Neuropsychologia. 2008; 46 (): 3088-3100
        • Faroqi-Shah Y.
        Selective treatment of regular versus irregular verbs in agrammatic aphasia: Efficacy data.
        Aphasiology. 2013; 27 (): 678-705
        • Ferguson N.F.
        • Evans K.
        • Raymer A.M.
        A comparison of intention and pantomime gesture treatment for noun retrieval in people with aphasia.
        American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology. 2012; 21: s126-s139
        • Fridriksson J.
        • Morrow-Odom L.
        • Moser D.
        • Fridriksson A.
        • Baylis G.
        Neural recruitment associated with anomia treatment in aphasia.
        NeuroImage. 2006; 32: 1403-1412
        • Johnson R.K.
        • Hough M.S.
        • King K.A.
        • Vos P.
        • Jeffs T.
        Functional communication in individuals with chronic severe aphasia using augmentative communication.
        AAC: Augmentative and Alternative Communication. 2008; 24: 269-280
        • Kendall D.L.
        • Oelke M.
        • Brookshire C.E.
        • Nadeau S.E.
        The Influence of Phonomotor Treatment on Word Retrieval Abilities in 26 Individuals With Chronic Aphasia: An Open Trial.
        Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research. 2015; 58 (15p): 798-812
        • Kendall D.L.
        • Raymer A.
        • Rose M.
        • Gilbert J.
        • Gonzalez Rothi L.J.
        Anomia treatment platform as behavioral engine for use in research on physiological adjuvants to neurorehabilitation.
        Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development. 2014; 51: 391-400
        • Kendall D.L.
        • Rosenbek J.C.
        • Heilman K.M.
        • Conway T.
        • Klenberg K.
        • Gonzalez Rothi L.J.
        • Nadeau S.E.
        Phoneme-based rehabilitation of anomia in aphasia.
        Brain and Language. 2008; 105: 1-17
        • Kiran S.
        Training phoneme to grapheme conversion for patients with written and oral production deficits: A model-based approach.
        Aphasiology. 2005; 19: 53-76
        • Kiran S.
        Typicality of inanimate category exemplars in aphasia treatment: Further evidence for semantic complexity.
        Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. 2008; 51: 1550-1568
        • Kiran S.
        • Johnson L.
        Semantic complexity in treatment of naming deficits in aphasia: Evidence from well-defined categories.
        American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology. 2008; 17: 389-400
        • Kiran S.
        • Sandberg C.
        • Abbott K.
        Treatment for lexical retrieval using abstract and concrete words in persons with aphasia: Effect of complexity.
        Aphasiology. 2009; 23: 835-853
        • Kiran S.
        • Sandberg C.
        • Sebastian R.
        Treatment of Category Generation and Retrieval in Aphasia: Effect of Typicality of Category Items.
        Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research. 2011; 54: 1101
        • Kiran S.
        • Thompson C.K.
        The Role of Semantic Complexity in Treatment of Naming Deficits Training Semantic Categories in Fluent Aphasia by Controlling Exemplar Typicality.
        Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. 2003; 46: 773-787
        • Kurland J.
        • Wilkins A.R.
        • Stokes P.
        iPractice: Piloting the effectiveness of a tablet-based home practice program in aphasia treatment.
        Seminars in Speech and Language. 2014; 35: 51-63
        • Lacey E.H.
        • Lott S.N.
        • Snider S.F.
        • Sperling A.
        • Friedman R.B.
        Multiple Oral Re-reading treatment for alexia: The parts may be greater than the whole.
        Neuropsychological Rehabilitation. 2010; 20: 601-623
        • Lesser R.
        • Bryan K.
        • Anderson J.
        • Hilton R.
        Involving relatives in aphasia therapy: An application of language enrichment therapy.
        International Journal of Rehabilitation Research. 1986; 9: 259-267
        • Macauley B.L.
        Animal-assisted therapy for persons with aphasia: A pilot study.
        Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development. 2006; 43: 357-366
        • MacGregor L.J.
        • Difrancesco S.
        • Pulvermüller F.
        • Shtyrov Y.
        • Mohr B.
        Ultra-rapid access to words in chronic aphasia: The effects of intensive language action therapy (ILAT).
        Brain Topography. 2015; 28: 279-291
        • Marshall R.S.
        • Laures-Gore J.
        • DuBay M.
        • Williams T.
        • Bryant D.
        Unilateral forced nostril breathing and aphasia—Exploring unilateral forced nostril breathing as an adjunct to aphasia treatment: A case series.
        The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine. 2015; 21: 91-99
        • Milman L.
        • Clendenen D.
        • Vega-Mendoza M.
        Production and integrated training of adjectives in three individuals with nonfluent aphasia.
        Aphasiology. 2014; 28: 1198-1222
        • Milman L.
        • Vega-Mendoza M.
        • Clendenen D.
        Integrated training for aphasia: An application of part-whole learning to treat lexical retrieval, sentence production, and discourse-level communications in three cases of nonfluent aphasia.
        American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology. 2014; 23: 105-119
        • Mohr B.
        • Difrancesco S.
        • Harrington K.
        • Evans S.
        • Pulvermüller F.
        Changes of right-hemispheric activation after constraint-induced, intensive language action therapy in chronic aphasia: fMRI evidence from auditory semantic processing.
        Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2014; 8
        • Mozeiko J.
        • Coelho C.A.
        • Myers E.B.
        The role of intensity in constraint-induced language therapy for people with chronic aphasia.
        Aphasiology. 2016; 30: 339-363
        • Nettleton J.
        • Lesser R.
        Therapy for naming difficulties in aphasia: Application of a cognitive neuropsychological model.
        NEL Journal of Neurolinguistics. 1991; 6: 139-157
        • Nickels L.
        • Osborne A.
        Constraint Induced Aphasia Therapy: Volunteer-led, unconstrained and less intense delivery can be effective.
        NeuroRehabilitation. 2016; 39: 97-109
        • Purdy M.
        • Wallace S.E.
        Intensive multimodal communication treatment for people with chronic aphasia.
        Aphasiology Aphasiology. 2015; : 1-23
        • Raymer A.M.
        • Kohen F.P.
        • Saffell D.
        Computerised training for impairments of word comprehension and retrieval in aphasia.
        Aphasiology. 2006; 20: 257-268
        • Raymer A.M.
        • McHose B.
        • Smith K.G.
        • Iman L.
        • Ambrose A.
        • Casselton C.
        Contrasting effects of errorless naming treatment and gestural facilitation for word retrieval in aphasia.
        Neuropsychological Rehabilitation. 2012; 22: 235-266
        • Raymer A.M.
        • Singletary F.
        • Rodriguez A.
        • Ciampitti M.
        • Heilman K.M.
        • Rothi L.J.G.
        Effects of gesture+verbal treatment for noun and verb retrieval in aphasia.
        Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society. 2006; 12: 867-882
        • Rider J.D.
        • Wright H.H.
        • Marshall R.C.
        • Page J.L.
        Using semantic feature analysis to improve contextual discourse in adults with aphasia.
        American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology. 2008; 17: 161-172
        • Rodriguez A.D.
        • Raymer A.M.
        • Rothi L.J.G.
        Effects of gesture+verbal and semantic-phonologic treatments for verb retrieval in aphasia.
        Aphasiology. 2006; 20: 286-297
        • Rodriguez A.D.
        • Worrall L.
        • Brown K.
        • Grohn B.
        • McKinnon E.
        • Pearson C.
        • Copland D.A.
        Aphasia LIFT: Exploratory investigation of an intensive comprehensive aphasia programme.
        Aphasiology. 2013; 27: 1339-1361
        • Rose M.L.
        • Attard M.C.
        • Mok Z.
        • Lanyon L.E.
        • Foster A.M.
        Multi-modality aphasia therapy is as efficacious as a constraint-induced aphasia therapy for chronic aphasia: A phase 1 study.
        Aphasiology. 2013; 27: 938-971
        • Sandberg C.W.
        • Bohland J.W.
        • Kiran S.
        Changes in functional connectivity related to direct training and generalization effects of a word finding treatment in chronic aphasia.
        Brain and Language. 2015; 150: 103-116
        • Schneider S.
        • Thompson C.
        Verb production in agrammatic aphasia: The influence of semantic class and argument structure properties on generalisation.
        Aphasiology. 2003; 17 (): 213-241
        • Schwartz M.F.
        • Saffran E.M.
        • Fink R.B.
        • Myers J.L.
        • Martin N.
        Mapping therapy: A treatment programme for agrammatism.
        Aphasiology. 1994; 8: 19-54
        • Silkes J.P.
        Masked Repetition Priming in Treatment of Anomia: A Phase 2 Study.
        American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology. 2015; 24 () (18p): S895-S912
        • Sorin-Peters R.
        • Behrmann M.
        Change in perception of communication abilities of aphasic patients and their families.
        Aphasiology. 1995; 9: 565-575
        • Steele R.D.
        • Baird A.
        • McCall D.
        • Haynes L.
        Combining Teletherapy and On-line Language Exercises in the Treatment of Chronic Aphasia: An Outcome Study.
        International Journal of Telerehabilitation. 2014; 6: 3-20
        • Thompson C.K.
        • Shapiro L.
        • Kiran S.
        • Sobecks J.
        The role of syntactic complexity in treatment of sentence deficits in agrammatic aphasia: The complexity account of treatment efficacy (CATE).
        Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. 2003; 46: 591-607
        • van der Gaag A.
        • Smith L.
        • Davis S.
        • Moss B.
        • Cornelius V.
        • Laing S.
        • Mowles C.
        Therapy and support services for people with long-term stroke and aphasia and their relatives: A six-month follow-up study.
        Clinical Rehabilitation. 2005; 19: 372-380
        • van Hees S.
        • Angwin A.
        • McMahon K.
        • Copland D.
        A comparison of semantic feature analysis and phonological components analysis for the treatment of naming impairments in aphasia.
        Neuropsychological Rehabilitation. 2013; 23: 102-132
        • Votruba K.L.
        • Rapport L.J.
        • Whitman R.D.
        • Johnson A.
        • Langenecker S.
        Personality differences among patients with chronic aphasia predict improvement in speech-language therapy.
        Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation. 2013; 20 (): 421-431
        • Waller A.
        • Dennis F.
        • Brodie J.
        • Cairns A.Y.
        Evaluating the use of TalksBac, a predictive communication device for nonfluent adults with aphasia.
        International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders. 1998; 33: 45-70
        • Wambaugh J.L.
        • Wright S.
        • Nessler C.
        Modified response elaboration training: A systematic extension with replications.
        Aphasiology. 2012; 26 (): 1407-1439
        • Wilson K.R.
        • O’Rourke H.
        • Wozniak L.A.
        • Kostopoulos E.
        • Marchand Y.
        • Newman A.J.
        Changes in N400 topography following intensive speech language therapy for individuals with aphasia.
        Brain and Language. 2012; 123: 94-103
      1. Note: ∗=excluded from dose frequency subgroup analysis reported in Table 1 because of insufficient information to classify in the original publication, or because participants received both types of dose frequency before post-treatment assessment.

      Included Between Group Studies

        • Altmann L.J.P.
        • Hazamy A.A.
        • Carvajal P.J.
        • Benjamin M.
        • Rosenbek J.C.
        • Crosson B.
        Delayed stimulus-specific improvements in discourse following anomia treatment using an intentional gesture.
        Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. 2014; 57: 439-454
        • Des Roches C.A.
        • Balachandran I.
        • Ascenso E.M.
        • Tripodis Y.
        • Kiran S.
        Effectiveness of an impairment-based individualized rehabilitation program using an iPad-based software platform.
        Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2015; 8
        • Des Roches C.A.
        • Balachandran I.
        • Ascenso E.M.
        • Tripodis Y.
        • Kiran S.
        Effectiveness of an impairment-based individualized rehabilitation program using an iPad-based software platform.
        Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2015; 8 (Retrieved from)
        • Godecke E.
        • Ciccone N.A.
        • Granger A.S.
        • Rai T.
        • West D.
        • Cream A.
        • Hankey G.J.
        A comparison of aphasia therapy outcomes before and after a Very Early Rehabilitation programme following stroke.
        International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders. 2014; 49 (13p): 149-161
        • Godecke E.
        • Hird K.
        • Lalor E.E.
        • Rai T.
        • Phillips M.R.
        Very early poststroke aphasia therapy: a pilot randomized controlled efficacy trial.
        International Journal of Stroke: Official Journal of the International Stroke Society. 2012; 7: 635-644
        • Katz R.C.
        • Wertz R.T.
        The efficacy of computer-provided reading treatment for chronic aphasic adults.
        Journal of Speech & Hearing Research. 1997; 40: 493-507
        • Maher L.M.
        • Kendall D.
        • Swearengin J.A.
        • Rodriguez A.
        • Leon S.A.
        • Pingel K.
        • Rothi L.J.G.
        A pilot study of use-dependent learning in the context of Constraint Induced Language Therapy.
        Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society. 2006; 12: 843-852
        • Raglio A.
        • Oasi O.
        • Gianotti M.
        • Rossi A.
        • Goulene K.
        • Stramba-Badiale M.
        Improvement of spontaneous language in stroke patients with chronic aphasia treated with music therapy: a randomized controlled trial.
        International Journal of Neuroscience. 2016; 126: 235-242
        • Wilssens I.
        • Vandenborre D.
        • van Dun K.
        • Verhoeven J.
        • Visch-Brink E.
        • Mariëna P.
        Constraint-induced aphasia therapy versus intensive semantic treatment in fluent aphasia.
        American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology. 2015; 24: 281-294