Effects of Electromechanical Exoskeleton-Assisted Gait Training on Walking Ability of Stroke Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial



      To assess the efficacy of electromechanical exoskeleton-assisted gait training on walking ability of stroke patients based on ambulatory function, muscle strength, balance, gait speed, and capacity.


      Randomized controlled trial.


      University rehabilitation hospital.


      Individuals (N=40) with stroke who could stand alone.


      Patients were randomly assigned to control and experimental groups. The control group underwent physical therapist-assisted gait training by conventional method. The experimental group underwent electromechanical gait training assisted by an exoskeleton device. Both types of gait training were performed for 30 minutes each day. The therapeutic interventions were provided for 5 days a week for a period of 4 weeks in both groups.

      Main Outcome Measures

      Functional ambulatory category (FAC) before and after gait training. Changes in FAC were the primary outcomes to evaluate the efficacy of electromechanical exoskeleton-assisted gait training. Changes in mobility, walking speed, walking capacity, leg muscle strength, daily activity, and balance were secondary outcomes.


      FAC in the control group was 2.44±1.55 in the pretraining and 2.75±1.53 in the post-training. FAC in the experimental group was 3.22±1.31 in the pretraining and 3.78±1.44 in the post-training. Although FAC between pre- and post-training sessions improved in both groups, the changes in FAC were statistically significant in the experimental group alone. Most secondary outcomes in both groups also showed improvement after gait training. However, the differential outcomes were not varied between the 2 groups after adjusting the data for age and stroke duration. We did not exclude patients based on time since stroke onset. The average stroke duration was 530.11±389.21 days in the experimental group. The changes in FAC of the experimental group were negatively correlated with stroke duration. No adverse events were noticed during gait training in either group.


      Electromechanical exoskeleton-assisted gait training is as effective as conventional gait training by a physical therapist when administered by a gait trainer. As an overground walking system without harness, electromechanical exoskeleton replaced a physical therapist in assisted gait training for patients who stand alone. Because the ambulatory function of stroke patients was affected negatively by stroke duration, the effect of electromechanical-assisted gait training might decline with increased stroke duration.


      List of abbreviations:

      6MWT (6-minute walk test), 10MWT (10-meter walk test), BBS (Berg balance scale), FAC (functional ambulation category), MBI (modified Barthel index), MI (motricity index), RMI (Rivermead mobility index)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Hollands K.L.
        • Pelton T.A.
        • Tyson S.F.
        • Hollands M.A.
        • van Vliet P.M.
        Interventions for coordination of walking following stroke: systematic review.
        Gait Posture. 2012; 35: 349-359
        • Reisman D.S.
        • Rudolph K.S.
        • Farquhar W.B.
        Influence of speed on walking economy poststroke.
        Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009; 23: 529-534
        • Kidwell C.S.
        • Saver J.L.
        • Schubert G.B.
        • Eckstein M.
        • Starkman S.
        Design and retrospective analysis of the Los Angeles Prehospital Stroke Screen (LAPSS).
        Prehosp Emerg Care. 1998; 2: 267-273
        • Mehrholz J.
        • Pohl M.
        Electromechanical-assisted gait training after stroke: a systematic review comparing end-effector and exoskeleton devices.
        J Rehabil Med. 2012; 44: 193-199
        • Bortole M.
        • del Ama A.
        • Rocon E.
        • Moreno J.C.
        • Brunetti F.
        • Pons J.L.
        A robotic exoskeleton for overground gait rehabilitation.
        IEEE Int Conf Robot Autom. 2013; : 6-10
        • Bortole M.
        • Venkatakrishnan A.
        • Zhu F.
        • et al.
        The H2 robotic exoskeleton for gait rehabilitation after stroke: early findings from a clinical study.
        J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2015; 12: 54
        • Pohl M.
        • Werner C.
        • Holzgraefe M.
        • et al.
        Repetitive locomotor training and physiotherapy improve walking and basic activities of daily living after stroke: a single-blind, randomized multicentre trial (DEutsche GAngtrainerStudie, DEGAS).
        Clin Rehabil. 2007; 21: 17-27
        • Holden M.K.
        • Gill K.M.
        • Magliozzi M.R.
        • Nathan J.
        • Piehl-Baker L.
        Clinical gait assessment in the neurologically impaired reliability and meaningfulness.
        Phys Ther. 1984; 64: 35-40
        • Collen F.M.
        • Wade D.T.
        • Robb G.F.
        • Bradshaw C.M.
        The Rivermead Mobility Index: a further development of the Rivermead Motor Assessment.
        Int Disabil Stud. 1991; 13: 50-54
        • van Loo M.A.
        • Moseley A.M.
        • Bosman J.M.
        • de Bie R.A.
        • Hassett L.
        Inter-rater reliability and concurrent validity of walking speed measurement after traumatic brain injury.
        Clin Rehabil. 2003; 17: 775-779
        • Guyatt G.H.
        • Sullivan M.J.
        • Thompson P.J.
        • et al.
        The 6-minute walk: a new measure of exercise capacity in patients with chronic heart failure.
        Can Med Assoc J. 1985; 132: 919-923
        • Cameron D.
        • Bohannon R.W.
        Criterion validity of lower extremity Motricity Index scores.
        Clin Rehabil. 2000; 14: 208-211
        • Berg K.O.
        • Wood-Dauphinee S.L.
        • Williams J.I.
        • Gayton D.
        Measuring balance in elderly: preliminary development of an instrument.
        Physiotherapy Canada. 1989; 41: 304-311
        • Shah A.
        • Vanclay F.
        • Cooper B.
        Improving the sensitivity of the Barthel index for stroke rehabilitation.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 1989; 42: 703-709
        • Morone G.
        • Bragoni M.
        • Iosa M.
        • et al.
        Who may benefit from robotic-assisted gait training? A randomized clinical trial in patients with subacute stroke.
        Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011; 25: 636-644
        • Chang M.C.
        • Kim D.Y.
        • Park D.H.
        Enhancement of cortical excitability and lower limb motor function in patients with stroke by transcranial direct current stimulation.
        Brain Stimul. 2015; 8: 561-566
        • Lee S.H.
        • Byun S.D.
        • Kim C.H.
        • et al.
        Feasibility and effects of newly developed balance control trainer for mobility and balance in chronic stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial.
        Ann Rehabil Med. 2012; 36: 521-529
        • Marque P.
        • Gasq D.
        • Castel-Lacanal E.
        • De Boissezon X.
        • Loubinoux I.
        Poststroke hemiplegia rehabilitation: evolution of the concepts.
        Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2014; 57: 520-529
        • Bang D.H.
        • Shin W.S.
        Effects of robot-assisted gait training on spatiotemporal gait parameters and balance in patients with chronic stroke: a randomized controlled pilot trial.
        NeuroRehabilitation. 2016; 38: 343-349
        • Held J.P.
        • Ferrer B.
        • Mainetti R.
        • et al.
        Autonomous rehabilitation at stroke patients home for balance and gait: safety, usability and compliance of a virtual reality system.
        Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2018; 54: 545-553
        • Langhorne P.
        • Coupar F.
        • Pollock A.
        Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review.
        Lancet Neurol. 2009; 8: 741-754