Abstract
Objectives
Work-related components are an essential part of rehabilitation programs to support
return to work of patients with musculoskeletal disorders. In Germany, a guideline
for work-related medical rehabilitation was developed to increase work-related treatment
components. In addition, new departments were approved to implement work-related medical
rehabilitation programs. The aim of our study was to explore the state of implementation
of the guideline’s recommendations by describing the change in the delivered dose
of work-related treatments.
Design
Nonrandomized controlled trial (cohort study).
Setting
Fifty-nine German rehabilitation centers.
Participants
Patients (N=9046) with musculoskeletal disorders were treated in work-related medical
rehabilitation or common medical rehabilitation. Patients were matched one-to-one
by propensity scores.
Interventions
Work-related medical rehabilitation in 2014 and medical rehabilitation in 2011.
Main Outcome Measures
Treatment dose of work-related therapies.
Results
The mean dose of work-related therapies increased from 2.2 hours (95% confidence interval
[CI], 1.6-2.8) to 8.9 hours (95% CI, 7.7-10.1). The mean dose of social counseling
increased from 51 to 84 minutes, the mean dose of psychosocial work-related groups
from 39 to 216 minutes, and the mean dose of functional capacity training from 39
to 234 minutes. The intraclass correlation of 0.67 (95% CI, 0.58-0.75) for the total
dose of work-related therapies indicated that the variance explained by centers was
high.
Conclusions
The delivered dose of work-related components was increased. However, there were discrepancies
between the guideline’s recommendations and the actual dose delivered in at least
half of the centers. It is very likely that this will affect the effectiveness of
work-related medical rehabilitation in practice.
Keywords
List of abbreviations:
CI (confidence interval), ICC (intraclass correlation coefficient), WMR (work-related medical rehabilitation)To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Archives of Physical Medicine and RehabilitationAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- Musculoskeletal pain in the workforce: the effects of back, arthritis, and fibromyalgia pain on quality of life and work productivity.J Occup Environ Med. 2011; 53: 765-770
- Economic impact of musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) on work in Europe.Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2015; 29: 356-373
- Back pain exacerbations and lost productive time costs in United States workers.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006; 31: 3052-3060
- Safety and health at work 2015.([German]) Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin, Dortmund, Germany2016
- World report on disability.World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland2011
- A conceptual definition of vocational rehabilitation based on the ICF: building a shared global model.J Occup Rehabil. 2011; 21: 126-133
- Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for chronic low back pain.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014; 9: Cd000963
- Physical conditioning as part of a return to work strategy to reduce sickness absence for workers with back pain.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; 8: Cd001822
- Workplace interventions to prevent work disability in workers on sick leave.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015; 10: Cd006955
- Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for subacute low back pain.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017; 6: Cd002193
- Efficacy of inpatient rehabilitation for chronic back pain in Germany: update of a systematic review.Rehabilitation. 2005; 44: 24-33
- Medical rehabilitation: “change we need.”.Rehabilitation. 2009; 48: 47-50
- Offering multidisciplinary medical rehabilitation to workers with work disability due to musculoskeletal disorders: results of randomized controlled trial.Gesundheitswesen. 2006; 68 ([German]): 347-356
- Efficacy of inpatient rehabilitation for chronic back pain in Germany: a systematic review 1980 - 2001.Rehabilitation. 2003; 42: 143-154
- Prospective cohort analysis of the predictive validity of a screening instrument for severe restrictions of work ability in patients with musculoskeletal disorders.Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2015; 94: 617-626
- Multiperspective estimates on the probability of patient return to work following orthopaedic rehabilitation: findings and predictive relevancy.Rehabilitation. 2001; 40: 217-225
- Prognosis of labour force participation after multidisciplinary outpatient and inpatient rehabilitation for chronic back pain.Rehabilitation. 2002; 41: 160-166
- Effects of intensified work-related multidisciplinary rehabilitation on occupational participation: a randomized-controlled trial in patients with chronic musculoskeletal disorders.Int J Rehabil Res. 2014; 37: 61-66
- A profile of requirements for the performance of work related medical rehabilitation from the perspective of the Statutory Pension Insurance.Rehabilitation. 2011; 50: 160-167
- Work status and health-related quality of life following multimodal work hardening: a cluster randomised trial.J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2011; 24: 161-172
- Work-related medical rehabilitation.Rehabilitation. 2017; 56: 14-21
- Steckler A. Linnan L. Process evaluation for public health interventions and research. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco2002
- Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance.BMJ. 2015; 350: h1258
- Predictive validity of a screening instrument for the risk of non-return to work in patients with internal diseases.Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017; 98: 989-996.e1
- Classification of therapeutic interventions in medical rehabilitation.([German]) Deutsche Rentenversicherung Bund, Berlin, Germany2007
- Guideline for work-related medical rehabilitation of the German Pension Insurance.([German]) Deutsche Rentenversicherung Bund, Berlin, Germany2012
- An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies.Multivariate Behav Res. 2011; 46: 399-424
- A glossary for dissemination and implementation research in health.J Public Health Manag Pract. 2008; 14: 117-123
- Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science.Implement Sci. 2009; 4: 50
- The challenge of innovation implementation.Acad Manage Rev. 1996; 21: 1055-1080
- Multiprofessional teamwork in work-related medical rehabilitation for patients with chronic musculoskeletal disorders.J Rehabil Med. 2015; 47: 58-65
- Work-related medical rehabilitation in patients with musculoskeletal disorders: the protocol of a propensity score matched effectiveness study (EVA-WMR, DRKS00009780).BMC Public Health. 2016; 16: 804
Article info
Publication history
Published online: July 06, 2018
Footnotes
Supported by the Federal German Pension Insurance.
Clinical Trial Registration No.: DRKS00009780.
The institutions of Matthias Bethge, Miriam Markus, Christian Gerlich, and Michael Schuler have received research grants from the Federal German Pension Insurance during the conduct of the study. Marco Streibelt is an employee of the Federal German Pension Insurance.
Identification
Copyright
© 2018 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine