Evaluating functional disability in people with rheumatoid arthritis is important
in evaluating disease progression and therapy effectiveness.1 The ABILHAND questionnaire measures the patient’s perceived difficulty in performing
everyday unimanual and bimanual activities. Durez et al1 used ABILHAND to examine self-perceived functional limitation in 112 people with
rheumatoid arthritis; the study evaluated content validity with Rasch Measurement
Theory. The statistical analysis with the Rasch Measurement Theory led to a selection
of 27 items rated on a 3-point scale (0=impossible; 1=any difficulty; 2=easy), that
fitted the Rasch measurement model. The items ranged from -2.18 to 2.65 “logits,”
with higher logits indicating more difficult activities. The item-difficulty hierarchy
was stable across demographic and clinical subgroups and over time. Only items about
tasks that might require moderate physical strength (eg, screwing on a nut, hammering
a nail, and handling a stapler) were more difficult for women than for men.1 ABILHAND has excellent internal consistency (person item separation=0.96)2 and adequate to excellent test-retest reliability (ICC 0.74-0.86).1., 3. The minimal clinically important difference was 0.47 logits for a small change, 1.18
logits for moderate change, and 1.89 logits for large change.3 Questionnaire completion takes 5-10 minutes. The website at http://www.rehab-scales.org/abilhand-rasch-analysis-rheumatoid-arthritis.html provides a free online scoring sheet, a conversion of the total score into a logit
score, and a Rasch-converted percentage for each patient. ABILHAND has fair to moderate
correlations with grip strength, pinch strength, and digital dexterity, ranging from
r=0.42-0.56; and excellent convergent validity with the health assessment portion of
the ABILHAND questionnaire (P=0.78).1
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Archives of Physical Medicine and RehabilitationAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
Article info
Publication history
Published online: June 12, 2018
Footnotes
Highlights From the Rehabilitation Measures Database
This content is provided as a service by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and is not peer reviewed by the Archives.
Identification
Copyright
© 2018 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine