To identify in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) undergoing a cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) tap test (TT) for consideration of a ventricular peritoneal (VP) shunt: (1) gait and balance measures, which identify symptom change; (2) differences present between pre– and post–CSF TT scores between patients classified as responders and nonresponder; (3) ability of patients with iNPH to accurately quantify change in their gait and balance symptoms from a CSF TT.
Prospective observational study. Post–CSF TT assessment was completed 2-4 hours post.
Tertiary referral neurological and neurosurgical hospital.
Patients (N=74) with iNPH receiving a 30 mL CSF TT for consideration of a VP shunt.
Patients underwent a battery of gait and balance measures pre– and post–CSF TT and indicated their perceived change on a global rating of change (GRC). Patients deemed to improve and offered VP shunt insertion by a neurologist or neurosurgeon were labeled responders.
Main Outcome Measures
Performance oriented mobility assessment (Tinetti), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), timed Up and Go (TUG), 10-meter walk test (10MWT), GRC.
Forty patients were classified responders, 34 nonresponders. Significant differences were identified for responders: Tinetti (3.88 points), TUG (3.98 seconds), 10MWT (0.08 m/sec), and BBS (5.29 points). Significant differences were found for nonresponders for the Tinetti (0.91 points) and BBS (2.06 points). Change scores for responders and nonresponders were significantly different for all tests between responders and nonresponders. GRC scores for gait (+2 for responders, 0 for nonresponders) and balance (+2.5 for responders, 0 for nonresponders) were both significantly different.
The Tinetti, BBS, and TUG can identify change in patients undergoing a CSF TT for iNPH. Patients appear to be able to accurately identify if change has occurred.
List of abbreviations:10MWT (10-meter walk test), BBS (Berg Balance Scale), CSF (cerebrospinal fluid), ELD (external lumbar drainage), GRC (global rating of change), iNPH (idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus), MDC (minimal detectable change), TUG (timed Up and Go), TT (tap test), VP (ventricular peritoneal)
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
One-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:Subscribe to Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
- The special clinical problem of symptomatic hydrocephalus with normal cerebrospinal fluid pressure. Observations on cerebrospinal fluid hydrodynamics.J Neurol Sci. 1965; 2: 307-327
- Diagnosis and management of idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus: a prospective study in 151 patients.J Neurosurg. 2005; 102: 987-997
- Guidelines for management of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus.Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2008; 48 Suppl: S1-S23
- Guidelines for management of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: second edition.Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2012; 52: 775-809
- Factors affecting ventriculoperitoneal shunt survival in adult patients.Surg Neurol Int. 2015; 6: 25
- Diagnosing idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus.Neurosurgery. 2005; 57: S4-S16
- Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: update and practical approach on diagnosis and management.Neurosurg Q. 2011; 21: 72-81
- Normal pressure hydrocephalus: how often does the diagnosis hold water?.Neurology. 2011; 77: 1119-1125
- Features of gait most responsive to tap test in normal pressure hydrocephalus.Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2008; 110: 455-461
- Predictors of outcome in patients with normal-pressure hydrocephalus.J Clin Neurosci. 2003; 10: 453-459
- The CSF tap test in normal pressure hydrocephalus: evaluation time, reliability and the influence of pain.Eur J Neurol. 2012; 19: 271-276
- The value of supplemental prognostic tests for the preoperative assessment of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus.Neurosurgery. 2005; 57: S17-S28
- Analysis of gait before and after cerebrospinal fluid lumbar tap test in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a literature review and case report.Topics in Geriatric Rehabilitation. 2009; 25: 203-210
- Sensitivity and predictive value of occupational and physical therapy assessments in the functional evaluation of patients with suspected normal pressure hydrocephalus.J Rehabil Med. 2008; 40: 715-720
- Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus, what is the physiotherapist’s role in assessment for surgery?.Physical Therapy Reviews. 2014; 19: 245-251
- The neuropsychology of iNPH: findings and evaluation of tests in the European multicentre study.Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2012; 114: 130-134
- Development of guidelines for idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: introduction.Neurosurgery. 2005; 57: S1-S3
- Test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change on balance and ambulation tests, the 36-item short-form health survey, and the unified Parkinson disease rating scale in people with parkinsonism.Phys Ther. 2008; 88: 733-746
- Minimal detectable change of the timed “up & go” test and the dynamic gait index in people with Parkinson disease.Phys Ther. 2011; 91: 114-121
- Clinimetric properties of the performance-oriented mobility assessment.Phys Ther. 2006; 86: 944-954
- A pilot study to explore the predictive validity of 4 measures of fall risks in frail elderly patients.Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005; 86: 1636-1640
- The balance scale: reliability assessment with elderly residents and patients with an acute stroke.Scand J Rehabil Med. 1995; 27: 27-36
- Feasibility and measurement properties of the functional reach and the timed up and go tests in the Canadian study of health and aging.J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2000; 55: M70-M73
- Global rating of change scales: a review of strengths and weaknesses and considerations for design.J Man Manip Ther. 2009; 17: 163-170
- A longitudinal study of gait and balance dysfunction in normal older people.Arch Neurol. 2003; 60: 835-839
- Comfortable and maximum walking speed of adults aged 20-79 years: reference values and determinants.Age Ageing. 1997; 26: 15-19
Published online: April 24, 2018
Supported by the University of Newcastle and Hunter New England Local Health District.
© 2018 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine