Advertisement

Specifying What We Study and Implement in Rehabilitation: Comments on the Reporting of Clinical Research

Published:April 09, 2018DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2018.03.008

      Abstract

      Several guidelines have been published with the goal of increasing the usefulness of reports of clinical research. Although such guidelines may clarify key features of study design, the way in which rehabilitation treatments themselves are described continues to be problematic and limits the ability to replicate research, synthesize evidence across studies, or apply these treatments in practice. Lohse et al report little improvement in the description of rehabilitation treatments in recent years, with particular limitations in the description of comparison or standard-of-care treatments. This commentary explores the kind of published treatment descriptions that would be most useful in supporting evidence synthesis and clinical implementation and examines the degree to which a developing conceptual framework—the Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System—might support improvements in research reporting.

      Keywords

      List of abbreviations:

      TIDieR (Template for Intervention Description and Replication)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

      1. Kohler R. Wilhelm E.E. Shoulson I. Institute of Medicine, Cognitive rehabilitation therapy for traumatic brain injury: evaluating the evidence. Defining cognitive rehabilitation therapy. The National Academies Press, Washington (DC)2011: 75-87
        • Chan L.
        • Heinemann A.
        • Roberts J.
        Elevating the quality of disability and rehabilitation research: mandatory use of the reporting guidelines.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014; 95: 415-417
        • Chan L.
        • Heinemann A.W.
        Clinical trial registration: the time has come….
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015; 96: 2093
        • Lohse K.R.
        • Pathania A.
        • Wegman R.
        • Boyd L.A.
        • Lang C.E.
        On the reporting of experimental and control therapies in stroke rehabilitation trials: a systematic review.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018; 99: 1424-1432
        • Boutron I.
        • Moher D.
        • Altman D.G.
        • Schulz K.F.
        • Ravaud P.
        Extending the CONSORT statement to randomized trials of nonpharmacologic treatment: explanation and elaboration.
        Ann Intern Med. 2008; 148: 295-309
        • Hoffmann T.C.
        • Glasziou P.P.
        • Boutron I.
        • et al.
        Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide.
        BMJ. 2014; 7: g1687
        • World Health Organization
        International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF).
        (Available at:) (Accessed March 2, 2018)
      2. Hart T, Dijkers MP, Whyte J, et al. A theory-driven system for the specification of rehabilitation treatments. Arch Phys Med Rehabil; submitted.

      3. Whyte J, Dijkers MP, Hart T, et al. The importance of voluntary behavior in rehabilitation treatment and outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil; submitted.

      Linked Article