Advertisement

Turning Data Into Information

Opportunities to Advance Rehabilitation Quality, Research, and Policy
Published:February 04, 2018DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2017.12.029

      Abstract

      Attention to health care quality and safety has increased dramatically. The internal focus of an organization is not without influence from external policy and research findings. Compared with other specialties, efforts to align and advance rehabilitation research, practice, and policy using electronic health record data are in the early stages. This special communication defines quality, applies the dimensions of quality to rehabilitation, and illustrates the feasibility and utility of electronic health record data for research on rehabilitation care quality and outcomes. Using data generated at the point of care provides the greatest opportunity for improving the quality of health care, producing generalizable evidence to inform policy and practice, and ultimately benefiting the health of the populations served.

      Keywords

      List of abbreviations:

      EHR (electronic health record), EQUADR (Exchanged Quality Data for Rehabilitation), PSO (patient safety organization)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Institute of Medicine (U.S.), Committee on Quality of Health Care in America
        Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century.
        National Academy Press, Washington (DC)2001
        • McKinney M.
        First, do no harm. HHS' National Quality Strategy uses broad approach to communicate expectations to providers.
        Mod Healthc. 2011; 41: 6-7
        • Shrank W.H.
        • Saunders R.S.
        • McClellan M.
        Better evidence to guide payment reforms: recognizing the importance of perspective.
        JAMA. 2017; 317: 805-806
        • Barnett A.S.
        • Lewis W.R.
        • Field M.E.
        • et al.
        Quality of evidence underlying the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology/Heart Rhythm Society guidelines on the management of atrial fibrillation.
        JAMA Cardiol. 2017; 2: 319-323
        • Baily M.A.
        • Bottrell M.
        • Lynn J.
        • Jennings B.
        The ethics of using QI methods to improve health care quality and safety.
        Hastings Center, Garrison, NY2006
        • Morris Z.S.
        • Wooding S.
        • Grant J.
        The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research.
        J R Soc Med. 2011; 104: 510-520
        • Middleton B.
        • Bloomrosen M.
        • Dente M.A.
        • et al.
        Enhancing patient safety and quality of care by improving the usability of electronic health record systems: recommendations from AMIA.
        J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013; 20: e2-8
        • World Health Organization
        Monitoring the building blocks of health systems: a handbook of indicators and their measurement strategies.
        World Health Organization Document Production Services, Geneva, Switzerland2010
        • Office of the Secretary, Health and Human Services
        HIPAA administrative simplification: enforcement. Interim final rule; request for comments.
        Fed Regist. 2009; 74: 56123-56131
        • Robertson A.
        • Cresswell K.
        • Takian A.
        • et al.
        Implementation and adoption of nationwide electronic health records in secondary care in England: qualitative analysis of interim results from a prospective national evaluation.
        BMJ. 2010; 341: c4564
        • Richesson R.L.
        • Hammond W.E.
        • Nahm M.
        • et al.
        Electronic health records based phenotyping in next-generation clinical trials: a perspective from the NIH Health Care Systems Collaboratory.
        J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013; 20: e226-e231
        • Fleurence R.L.
        • Curtis L.H.
        • Califf R.M.
        • et al.
        Launching PCORnet, a national patient-centered clinical research network.
        J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014; 21: 578-582
        • Graham J.E.
        • Middleton J.A.
        • Mallinson T.
        • et al.
        Health services research in rehabilitation and disability—the time is now.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018; 99: 198-203
        • Clancy C.M.
        New patient safety organizations can help health providers learn from and reduce patient safety events.
        J Patient Saf. 2009; 5: 1-2
        • Elkin P.L.
        • Johnson H.C.
        • Callahan M.R.
        • Classen D.C.
        Improving patient safety reporting with the common formats: common data representation for patient safety organizations.
        J Biomed Inform. 2016; 64: 116-121
        • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
        Framework for program evaluation in public health.
        MMWR Recomm Rep. 1999; 48: 1-58
        • Menon-Nair A.
        • Korner-Bitensky N.
        • Ogourtsova T.
        Occupational therapists' identification, assessment, and treatment of unilateral spatial neglect during stroke rehabilitation in Canada.
        Stroke. 2007; 38: 2556-2562