Advertisement

Determining Reliability of a Dual-Task Functional Mobility Protocol for Individuals With Lower Extremity Amputation

Published:January 06, 2018DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2017.12.008

      Abstract

      Objective

      To determine the relative and absolute reliability of a dual-task functional mobility assessment.

      Design

      Cross-sectional study.

      Setting

      Academic rehabilitation hospital.

      Participants

      Individuals (N=60) with lower extremity amputation attending an outpatient amputee clinic (mean age, 58.21±12.59y; 18, 80% male) who were stratified into 3 groups: (1) transtibial amputation of vascular etiology (n=20); (2) transtibial amputation of nonvascular etiology (n=20); and (3) transfemoral or bilateral amputation of any etiology (n=20).

      Interventions

      Not applicable.

      Main Outcome Measures

      Time to complete the L Test measured functional mobility under single- and dual-task conditions. The addition of a cognitive task (serial subtractions by 3's) created dual-task conditions. Single-task performance on the cognitive task was also reported. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) measured relative reliability; SEM and minimal detectable change with a 95% confidence interval (MDC95) measured absolute reliability. Bland-Altman plots measured agreement between assessments.

      Results

      Relative reliability results were excellent for all 3 groups. Values for the dual-task L Test for those with transtibial amputation of vascular etiology (n=20; mean age, 60.36±7.84y; 19, 90% men) were ICC=.98 (95% confidence interval [CI], .94–.99), SEM=1.36 seconds, and MDC95=3.76 seconds; for those with transtibial amputation of nonvascular etiology (n=20; mean age, 55.85±14.08y; 17, 85% men), values were ICC=.93 (95% CI, .80–.98), SEM=1.34 seconds, and MDC95=3.71 seconds; and for those with transfemoral or bilateral amputation (n=20; mean age, 58.21±14.88y; 13, 65% men), values were ICC=.998 (95% CI, .996–.999), SEM=1.03 seconds, and MDC95=2.85 seconds. Bland-Altman plots indicated that assessments did not vary systematically for each group.

      Conclusions

      This dual-task assessment protocol achieved approved levels of relative reliability values for the 3 groups tested. This protocol may be used clinically or in research settings to assess the interaction between cognition and functional mobility in the population with lower extremity amputation.

      Keywords

      List of abbreviations:

      ABC (Activities-specific Balance Confidence), CI (Confidence interval), ICC (Intraclass correlation coefficient), LEA (Lower extremity amputation), MDC95 (Minimal detectable change with a 95% confidence interval), MoCA (Montreal Cognitive Assessment), TFA (Transfemoral amputation), TTA (Transtibial amputation)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Helm P.
        • Engel T.
        • Holm A.
        • Kristiansen V.B.
        • Rosendahl S.
        Function after lower limb amputation.
        Acta Orthop Scand. 1986; 57: 154-157
        • Reyes R.L.
        • Leahey E.B.
        Elderly patients with lower extremity amputations: three-year study in a rehabilitation setting.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1977; 58: 116-123
        • Stirnemann P.
        • Mlinaric Z.
        • Oesch A.
        • Kirchhof B.
        • Althaus U.
        Major lower extremity amputation in patients with peripheral arterial insufficiency with special reference to the transgenicular amputation.
        J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 1987; 28: 152-158
        • Frengopoulos C.
        • Burley J.
        • Viana R.
        • Payne M.W.
        • Hunter S.W.
        Association between Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores and measures of functional mobility in lower extremity amputees after inpatient rehabilitation.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017; 98: 450-455
        • National Diabetes Surveillance System
        Report from the National Diabetes Surveillance System: diabetes in Canada, 2009.
        National Diabetes Surveillance System, Ottawa2009
        • Ziegler-Graham K.
        • MacKenzie E.J.
        • Ephraim P.L.
        • Travison T.G.
        • Brookmeyer R.
        Estimating the prevalence of limb loss in the United States: 2005 to 2050.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008; 89: 422-429
        • Miller W.C.
        Falling, fear of falling and balance confidence among amputees [dissertation].
        Univ of Western Ontario, London2000
      1. Frontera W.R. DeLisa J.A. DeLisa’s physical medicine and rehabilitation. 5th ed. Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Health, Philadelphia2010
        • Miller W.C.
        • Deathe A.B.
        • Speechley M.
        • Koval J.
        The influence of falling, fear of falling, and balance confidence on prosthetic mobility and social activity among individuals with a lower extremity amputation.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001; 82: 1238-1244
        • Siriwardena G.
        • Bertrand P.
        Factors influencing rehabilitation of arteriosclerotic lower limb amputees.
        J Rehabil Res Dev. 1991; 28: 35-44
        • Czerniecki J.M.
        • Turner A.P.
        • Williams R.M.
        • Hakimi K.N.
        • Norvell D.C.
        Mobility changes in individuals with dysvascular amputation from the presurgical period to 12 months postamputation.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012; 93: 1766-1773
        • Latlief G.
        • Elnitsky C.
        • Kent R.
        Lower extremity amputation.
        in: Batmangelich S. Cristian A. Physical medicine and rehabilitation patient-centered care. Demos Medical, New York2014: p 409
        • Ward K.
        • Meyers M.
        Exercise performance of lower-extremity amputees.
        Sport Med. 1995; 20: 207-214
        • Ganz D.A.
        • Bao Y.
        • Shekelle P.G.
        • Rubenstein L.Z.
        Will my patient fall?.
        JAMA. 2007; 297: 77-86
        • Tinetti M.E.
        • Mendes de Leon C.F.
        • Doucette J.T.
        • Baker D.I.
        Fear of falling and fall-related efficacy in relationship to functioning among community-living elders.
        J Gerontol. 1994; 49: M140-M147
        • Maki B.E.
        • Holliday P.J.
        • Topper A.K.
        Fear of falling and postural performance in the elderly.
        J Gerontol. 1991; 46: M123-M131
        • Tinetti M.E.
        • Speechley M.
        • Ginter S.F.
        Risk factors for falls among elderly persons living in the community.
        N Engl J Med. 1988; 319: 1701-1707
        • Deathe A.B.
        • Miller W.C.
        • Speechley M.
        The status of outcome measurement in amputee rehabilitation in Canada.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002; 83: 912-918
        • Treweek S.
        • Condie M.
        Three measures of functional outcome for lower limb amputees: a retrospective review.
        Prosthet Orthot Int. 1998; 22: 178-185
        • Fuhrer M.
        • Keith R.
        Facilitating patient learning during medical rehabilitation: a research agenda.
        Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1998; 77: 557-561
        • Larner S.
        • van Ross E.
        • Hale C.
        Do psychological measures predict the ability of lower limb amputees to learn to use a prosthesis?.
        Clin Rehabil. 2003; 17: 493-498
        • O’Neill B.F.
        • Moran K.
        • Gillespie A.
        Scaffolding rehabilitation behaviour using a voice-mediated assistive technology for cognition.
        Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2010; 20: 509-527
        • Phillips N.A.
        • Mate-Kole C.C.
        • Kirby R.L.
        Neuropsychological function in peripheral vascular disease amputee patients.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993; 74: 1309-1314
        • Lowry K.A.
        • Brach J.S.
        • Nebes R.D.
        • Studenski S.A.
        • VanSwearingen J.M.
        Contributions of cognitive function to straight- and curved-path walking in older adults.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012; 93: 802-807
        • Coffey L.
        • O’Keeffe F.
        • Gallagher P.
        • Desmond D.
        • Lombard-Vance R.
        Cognitive functioning in persons with lower limb amputations: a review.
        Disabil Rehabil. 2012; 34: 1950-1964
        • O’Neill B.F.
        • Evans J.J.
        Memory and executive function predit mobility rehabilitation outcome after lower-limb amputation.
        Disabil Rehabil. 2009; 31: 1083-1091
        • Hanspal R.S.
        • Fisher K.
        Assessment of cognitive and psychomotor function and rehabilitation of elderly people with prostheses.
        BMJ. 1991; 302: 940
        • O’Neill B.F.
        Cognition and mobility rehabilitation following lower limb amputation.
        in: Gallagher P. Desmond D. MacLachlan M. Psychoprosthetics. Springer, London2008: 53-65
        • Sansam K.
        • Neumann V.
        • O’Connor R.
        • Bhakta B.
        Predicting walking ability following lower limb amputation: a systematic review of the literature.
        J Rehabil Med. 2009; 41: 593-603
        • Yogev G.
        • Hausdorff J.M.
        • Giladi N.
        The role of executive function and attention in gait.
        Mov Disord. 2008; 23: 329-472
        • Morgan S.J.
        • Hafner B.J.
        • Kelly V.E.
        Dual-task walking over a compliant foam surface: a comparison of people with transfemoral amputation and controls.
        Gait Posture. 2017; 58: 41-45
        • Morgan S.J.
        • Hafner B.J.
        • Kelly V.E.
        The effects of a concurrent task on walking in persons with transfemoral amputation compared to persons without limb loss.
        Prosthet Orthot Int. 2016; 40: 490-496
        • Braddom R.L.
        Physical medicine and rehabilitation.
        4th ed. Elsevier, Philadelphia2011
        • Walter S.D.
        • Eliasziw M.
        • Donner A.
        Sample size and optimal designs for reliability studies.
        Stat Med. 1998; 17: 101-110
        • Nasreddine Z.S.
        • Phillips N.A.
        • Bédirian V.
        • et al.
        The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment.
        J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005; 53: 695-699
        • Alagiakrishnan K.
        • Zhao N.
        • Mereu L.
        • Senior P.
        • Senthilselvan A.
        Montreal Cognitive Assessment is superior to standardized Mini-Mental Status Exam in detecting mild cognitive impairment in the middle-aged and elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
        Biomed Res Int. 2013; 2013: 186106
        • Powell L.E.
        • Myers A.M.
        The Activities-Specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale.
        J Gerontol Med Sci. 1995; 50A: M28-M34
        • Miller W.C.
        • Deathe A.B.
        • Speechley M.
        Psychometric properties of the Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale among individuals with a lower-limb amputation.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003; 84: 656-661
        • Deathe A.B.
        • Miller W.C.
        The L Test of Functional Mobility: measurement properties of a modified version of the Timed “Up & Go” Test designed for people with lower-limb amputations.
        Phys Ther. 2005; 85: 626-635
        • Al-Yahya E.
        • Dawes H.
        • Smith L.
        • Dennis A.
        • Howells K.
        • Cockburn J.
        Cognitive motor interference while walking: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2011; 35: 715-728
        • Streiner D.L.
        • Norman G.R.
        Health Measurement Scales: a practical guide to their development and use.
        Oxford Univ Pr, New York2003
        • Bland J.M.
        • Altman D.G.
        Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.
        Lancet. 1986; 1: 307-310
        • Muir S.W.
        • Speechley M.
        • Wells J.
        • Borrie M.
        • Gopaul K.
        • Montero-Odasso M.
        Gait assessment in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease: the effect of dual-task challenges across the cognitive spectrum.
        Gait Posture. 2012; 35: 96-100