Advertisement

Low-Frequency Pulsed Current Versus Kilohertz-Frequency Alternating Current: A Scoping Literature Review

Published:December 13, 2017DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2017.12.001

      Abstract

      Objectives

      To compare the effectiveness of low-frequency pulsed current versus kilohertz-frequency alternating current in terms of evoked force, discomfort level, current intensity, and muscle fatigability; to discuss the physiological mechanisms of each neuromuscular electrical stimulation type; and to determine if kilohertz-frequency alternating current is better than low-frequency pulsed current for clinical treatment.

      Data Sources

      Articles were obtained from PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL, MEDLINE, and SPORTSDiscus databases using the terms Russian current or kilohertz current or alternating current or pulsed current or Aussie current and torque or discomfort or fatigue or current intensity, and through citation tracking up to July 2017.

      Study Selection

      Two independent reviewers selected studies comparing the use of the 2 neuromuscular electrical stimulation currents. Studies describing maximal current intensity tolerated and the main effects of the 2 different current types on discomfort, muscle force, and fatigability were independently reviewed.

      Data Extraction

      Data were systematized according to (1) methodology; (2) electrical current characteristics; and (3) outcomes on discomfort level, evoked force, current intensity, and muscle fatigability.

      Data Synthesis

      The search revealed 15 articles comparing the 2 current types. Kilohertz-frequency alternated current generated equal or less force, similar discomfort, similar current intensity for maximal tolerated neuromuscular electrical stimulation, and more fatigue compared with low-frequency pulsed current. Similar submaximal levels of evoked force revealed higher discomfort and current intensity for kilohertz-frequency alternated current compared with low-frequency pulsed current.

      Conclusions

      Available evidence does not support the idea that kilohertz-frequency alternated current is better than low-frequency pulsed current for strength training and rehabilitation.

      Keyword

      List of abbreviations:

      BP (biphasic), MP (monophasic), MVIC (maximal voluntary isometric contraction), NMES (neuromuscular electrical stimulation), PEDro (Physiotherapy Evidence Database), VAS (visual analog scale)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Maffiuletti N.A.
        Physiological and methodological considerations for the use of neuromuscular electrical stimulation.
        Eur J Appl Physiol. 2000; 110: 223-234
        • Maffiuletti N.A.
        • Minetto M.A.
        • Farina D.
        • Bottinelli R.
        Electrical stimulation for neuromuscular testing and training: state-of-the-art and unresolved issues.
        Eur J Appl Physiol. 2011; 111: 2391-2397
        • Collins D.F.
        Central contributions to contractions evoked by tetanic neuromuscular electrical stimulation.
        Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2007; 35: 102-109
        • Ward A.R.
        • Chuen W.L.
        Lowering of sensory, motor and pain-tolerance thresholds with burst duration using kilohertz-frequency alternating current electric stimulation: part II.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009; 90: 1619-1627
        • Ward A.R.
        • Robertson V.J.
        The variation in fatigue rate with frequency using kHz frequency alternating current.
        Med Eng Phys. 2000; 22: 637-646
        • Kots Y.M.
        • Xvilon V.A.
        Trenirovka mishechnoj sili metodom elektrostimuliatsii: soobschenie 2, trenirovka metodom elektricheskogo razdrazenii mishechi.
        Teor Pract Fis Cult. 1971; 4: 66-72
        • Kramer J.
        • Mendryk S.W.
        Electrical stimulation as a strength improvement technique.
        J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1982; 4: 91-98
        • Ward A.R.
        • Shkuratova N.
        Russian electrical stimulation: the early experiments.
        Phys Ther. 2002; 82: 1019-1030
        • Ward A.R.
        Electrical stimulation using kilohertz-frequency alternating current.
        Phys Ther. 2009; 89: 181-190
        • Bellew J.W.
        • Beiswanger Z.
        • Freeman E.
        • Gaerte C.
        • Trafton J.
        Interferential and burst-modulated biphasic pulsed currents yield greater muscular force than Russian current.
        Physiother Theory Pract. 2012; 28: 384-390
        • Aldayel A.
        • Jubeau M.
        • McGuigan M.
        • Nosaka K.
        Comparison between alternating and pulsed current electrical muscle stimulation for muscle and systemic acute responses.
        J Appl Physiol. 2010; 109: 735-744
        • Aldayel A.
        • Muthalib M.
        • Jubeau M.
        • McGuigan M.
        • Nosaka K.
        Muscle oxygenation of vastus lateralis and medialis muscles during alternating and pulsed current electrical stimulation.
        Eur J Appl Physiol. 2011; 111: 779-787
        • Dantas L.O.
        • Vieira A.
        • Siqueira Junior A.L.
        • Salvini T.F.
        • Durigan J.L.
        Comparison between the effects of 4 different electrical stimulation current waveforms on isometric knee extension torque and perceived discomfort in healthy women.
        Muscle Nerve. 2015; 51: 76-82
        • Fukuda T.Y.
        • Marcondes F.B.
        • Rabelo N.A.
        • Vasconcelos R.A.
        • Cazarini Jr., C.
        Comparison of peak torque, intensity and discomfort generated by neuromuscular electrical stimulation of low and medium frequency.
        Isokin Exerc Sci. 2013; 21: 167-173
        • Holcomb W.R.
        • Golestani S.
        • Hill S.
        A comparison of knee extension torque production with biphasic versus Russian current.
        J Sport Rehabil. 2000; 9: 229-239
        • Laufer Y.
        • Ries J.D.
        • Leininger P.M.
        • Alon G.
        Quadriceps femoris muscle torques and fatigue generated by neuromuscular electrical stimulation with three different waveforms.
        Phys Ther. 2001; 81: 1307-1316
        • Laufer Y.
        • Elboim M.
        Effect of burst frequency and duration of kilohertz-frequency alternating currents and of low-frequency pulsed currents on strength of contraction, muscle fatigue, and perceived discomfort.
        Phys Ther. 2008; 88: 1167-1176
        • Liebano R.E.
        • Alves L.M.
        Comparison of the sensory discomfort index during neuromuscular electrical stimulation with low and medium excitomotor frequencies in healthy women.
        Rev Bras Med Esp. 2009; 15: 50-53
        • Lyons C.L.
        • Robb J.B.
        • Irrgang J.J.
        • Fitzgerald G.K.
        Differences in quadriceps femoris muscle torque when using a clinical electrical stimulator versus a portable electrical stimulator.
        Phys Ther. 2005; 85: 44-51
        • Medeiros F.V.
        • Bottaro M.
        • Vieira A.
        • et al.
        Kilohertz and low-frequency electrical stimulation with the same pulse duration have similar efficiency for inducing isometric knee extension torque and discomfort.
        Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2017; 96: 388-394
        • Scott W.
        • Adams C.
        • Cyr S.
        • et al.
        Electrically elicited muscle torque: comparison between 2500-Hz burst-modulated alternating current and monophasic pulsed current.
        J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2015; 45: 1035-1041
        • Snyder-Mackler L.
        • Garrett M.
        • Roberts M.A.
        Comparison of torque generating capabilities of three different electrical stimulating currents.
        J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1989; 10: 297-302
        • Vaz M.A.
        • Aragão F.A.
        • Boschi E.S.
        • Fortuna R.
        • Melo M.O.
        Effects of Russian current and low-frequency pulsed current on discomfort level and current amplitude at 10% maximal knee extensor torque.
        Physiother Theory Pract. 2012; 28: 617-623
        • Walmsley R.P.
        • Lett G.
        • Vooys J.
        A comparison of torque generated by knee extension with maximal voluntary contraction vis-a-vis electrical stimulation.
        J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1984; 6: 10-17
        • Ward A.R.
        • Oliver W.G.
        • Buccella D.
        Wrist extensor torque production and discomfort associated with low-frequency and burst-modulated kilohertz currents.
        Phys Ther. 2006; 86: 1360-1367
        • Maher C.G.
        • Sherrington C.
        • Herbert R.D.
        • Moseley A.M.
        • Elkins M.
        Reliability of the PEDro scale for rating quality of randomized controlled trials.
        Phys Ther. 2003; 83: 713-721
        • Tooth L.
        • Bennett S.
        • McCluskey A.
        • Hoffmann T.
        • McKenna K.
        • Lovarini M.
        Appraising the quality of randomized controlled trials: inter-rater reliability for the OTseeker evidence database.
        J Eval Clin Pract. 2005; 11: 547-555
        • Cohen J.
        Statistical methods for meta-analysis.
        Academic Press, San Diego1998
        • Binder-Macleod S.A.
        • McDemzorui L.R.
        Changes in the force-frequency relationship of the human quadriceps femoris muscle following electrically and voluntarily induced fatigue.
        Phys Ther. 1992; 72: 95-104
        • Binder-Macleod S.A.
        • Lee S.C.
        • Fritz A.D.
        • Kucharski L.J.
        New look at force-frequency relationship of human skeletal muscle: effects of fatigue.
        J Neurophysiol. 1998; 79: 1858-1868
        • Fuglevand A.J.
        • Macefield V.G.
        • Bigland-Ritchie B.
        Force-frequency and fatigue properties of motor units in muscles that control digits of the human hand.
        J Neurophysiol. 1999; 81: 1718-1729
        • Petrofsky J.
        • Laymon M.
        • Prowse M.
        • Gunda S.
        • Batt J.
        The transfer of current through skin and muscle during electrical stimulation with sine, square, Russian and interferential waveforms.
        J Med Eng Tech. 2009; 33: 170-181
        • Liebano R.E.
        • Rodrigues T.A.
        • Murazawa M.T.
        • Ward A.R.
        The influence of stimulus phase duration on discomfort and electrically induced torque of quadriceps femoris.
        Braz J Phys Ther. 2013; 17: 479-486
        • da Silva V.Z.
        • Durigan J.L.
        • Arena R.
        • Noronha M.
        • Gurney B.
        • Cipriano Jr., G.
        Current evidence demonstrates similar effects of kilohertz-frequency and low-frequency current on quadriceps evoked torque and discomfort in healthy individuals: a systematic review with meta-analysis.
        Physiother Theory Pract. 2015; 31: 533-539
        • Ward A.R.
        • Robertson V.J.
        • Makowski R.J.
        Optimal frequencies for electric stimulation using medium frequency alternating current.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002; 83: 1024-1027