Advertisement

Postacute Care Setting, Facility Characteristics, and Poststroke Outcomes: A Systematic Review

Published:September 28, 2017DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2017.09.005

      Abstract

      Objectives

      To synthesize research comparing poststroke health outcomes between patients rehabilitated in skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) and those in inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs) as well as to evaluate relations between facility characteristics and outcomes.

      Data Sources

      PubMed and CINAHL searches spanned January 1, 1998, to October 6, 2016, and encompassed MeSH and free-text keywords for stroke, IRF/SNF, and study outcomes. Searches were restricted to peer-reviewed research in humans published in English.

      Study Selection

      Observational and experimental studies examining outcomes of adult patients with stroke rehabilitated in an IRF or SNF were eligible. Studies had to provide site of care comparisons and/or analyses incorporating facility-level characteristics and had to report ≥1 primary outcome (discharge setting, functional status, readmission, quality of life, all-cause mortality). Unpublished, single-center, descriptive, and non-US studies were excluded. Articles were reviewed by 1 author, and when uncertain, discussion with study coauthors achieved consensus. Fourteen titles (0.3%) were included.

      Data Extraction

      The types of data, time period, size, design, and primary outcomes were extracted. We also extracted 2 secondary outcomes (length of IRF/SNF stay, cost) when reported by included studies. Effect measures, modeling approaches, methods for confounding adjustment, and potential confounders were extracted. Data were abstracted by 1 author, and the accuracy was verified by a second reviewer.

      Data Synthesis

      Two studies evaluating community discharge, 1 study evaluating the predicted probability of readmission, and 3 studies evaluating all-cause mortality favored IRFs over SNFs. Functional status comparisons were inconsistent. No studies evaluated quality of life. Two studies confirmed increased costs in the IRF versus SNF setting. Although substantial facility variation was described, few studies characterized sources of variation.

      Conclusions

      The few studies comparing poststroke outcomes indicated better outcomes (with higher costs) for patients in IRFs versus those in SNFs. Contemporary research on the role of the postacute care setting and its attributes in determining health outcomes should be prioritized to inform reimbursement system reform.

      Keywords

      List of abbreviations:

      IRF (inpatient rehabilitation facility), LTCH (long-term care hospital), MedPAC (Medicare Payment Advisory Commission), PPS (prospective payment system), SNF (skilled nursing facility)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Medicare Payment Advisory Commission
        A data book: health care spending and the Medicare program.
        Medicare Payment Advisory Commission, Washington (DC)2016
        • Tian W.
        An all-payer view of hospital discharge to postacute care, 2013.
        (May 2016. p 1-17. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Statistical Brief #205. Available at:) (Accessed December 19, 2016)
        • Gage B.
        • Ingber M.J.
        • Morley M.
        • et al.
        Post-acute care payment reform demonstration: final report. Vol 1. U.S. Centers for Medicare &Medicaid Services, Baltimore2012
        • Gage B.
        • Ingber M.J.
        • Morley M.
        • et al.
        Post-acute care payment reform demonstration: final report. Vol 3. U.S. Centers for Medicare &Medicaid Services, Baltimore2012
        • Gage B.
        • Smith L.
        • Coots L.
        • Macek III, J.
        • Manning J.
        • Reilly K.
        Report to Congress: analysis of the classification criteria for inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs).
        U.S. Centers for Medicare &Medicaid Services, Baltimore2009: 1-51
        • Medicare Payment Advisory Commission
        Mandated report: developing a unified payment system for post-acure care.
        Medicare Payment Advisory Commission, Washington (DC)2016 (Report to Congress: Chapter 3)
        • Colby S.L.
        • Ortman J.M.
        Projections of the size and composition of the US population: 2014 to 2060.
        (Current Population Report No. P25-1143. Available at:) (Accessed November 30, 2016)
        • Medicare Payment Advisory Commission
        Monitoring Post-Acute Care.
        Medicare Payment Advisory Commission, Washington (DC)2003 (Report to Congress: Chapter 5)
        • Medicare Payment Advisory Commission
        Skilled nursing facility services payment system.
        Medicare Payment Advisory Commission, Washington (DC)2016 (Payment Basics 1-4)
        • Medicare Payment Advisory Commission
        Inpatient rehabilitation facilities payment system.
        Medicare Payment Advisory Commission, Washington (DC)2016 (Payment Basics 1-3)
      1. Improving Medicare Post-Acute Care Transformation Act of 2014, 42 USC §1395 (October 6, 2014).

        • Medicare Payment Advisory Commission
        Medicare's post-acute care: trends and ways to rationalize payments.
        Medicare Payment Advisory Commission, Washington (DC)2015 (Report to Congress: Chapter 7)
        • Ward D.
        • Drahota A.
        • Gal D.
        • Severs M.
        • Dean T.P.
        Care home versus hospital and own home environments for rehabilitation of older people.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008; : CD003164
        • Moher D.
        • Liberati A.
        • Tetzlaff J.
        • Altman D.G.
        • PRISMA Group
        Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement.
        PLoS Med. 2009; 6: e1000097
        • Fonarow G.C.
        • Reeves M.J.
        • Zhao X.
        • et al.
        Age-related differences in characteristics, performance measures, treatment trends, and outcomes in patients with ischemic stroke.
        Circulation. 2010; 121: 879-891
        • Saposnik G.
        • Guzik A.K.
        • Reeves M.
        • Ovbiagele B.
        • Johnston S.C.
        Stroke Prognostication using Age and NIH Stroke Scale: SPAN-100.
        Neurology. 2013; 80: 21-28
        • Chisholm L.
        • Weech-Maldonado R.
        • Laberge A.
        • Lin F.C.
        • Hyer K.
        Nursing home quality and financial performance: does the racial composition of residents matter?.
        Health Serv Res. 2013; 48: 2060-2080
        • Holup A.A.
        • Gassoumis Z.D.
        • Wilber K.H.
        • Hyer K.
        Community discharge of nursing home residents: the role of facility characteristics.
        Health Serv Res. 2016; 51: 645-666
        • Neuman M.D.
        • Wirtalla C.
        • Werner R.M.
        Association between skilled nursing facility quality indicators and hospital readmissions.
        JAMA. 2014; 312: 1542-1551
        • Buntin M.B.
        • Colla C.H.
        • Deb P.
        • Sood N.
        • Escarce J.J.
        Medicare spending and outcomes after postacute care for stroke and hip fracture.
        Med Care. 2010; 48: 776-784
        • Chen C.C.
        • Heinemann A.W.
        • Granger C.V.
        • Linn R.T.
        Functional gains and therapy intensity during subacute rehabilitation: a study of 20 facilities.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002; 83: 1514-1523
        • Deutsch A.
        • Granger C.V.
        • Heinemann A.W.
        • et al.
        Poststroke rehabilitation: outcomes and reimbursement of inpatient rehabilitation facilities and subacute rehabilitation programs.
        Stroke. 2006; 37: 1477-1482
        • Hoenig H.
        • Sloane R.
        • Horner R.D.
        • Zolkewitz M.
        • Reker D.
        Differences in rehabilitation services and outcomes among stroke patients cared for in veterans hospitals.
        Health Serv Res. 2001; 35: 1293-1318
        • Kane R.L.
        • Chen Q.
        • Finch M.
        • Blewett L.
        • Burns R.
        • Moskowitz M.
        The optimal outcomes of post-hospital care under Medicare.
        Health Serv Res. 2000; 35: 615-661
        • Kind A.J.
        • Smith M.A.
        • Liou J.
        • Pandhi N.
        • Frytak J.R.
        • Finch M.D.
        Discharge destination's effect on bounce-back risk in black, white, and Hispanic acute ischemic stroke patients.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010; 91: 189-195
        • Wang H.
        • Sandel M.E.
        • Terdiman J.
        • et al.
        Postacute care and ischemic stroke mortality: findings from an integrated health care system in Northern California.
        PM R. 2011; 3: 686-694
        • Chan L.
        • Sandel M.E.
        • Jette A.M.
        • et al.
        Does postacute care site matter? A longitudinal study assessing functional recovery after a stroke.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013; 94: 622-629
        • Colla C.H.
        • Escarce J.J.
        • Buntin M.B.
        • Sood N.
        Effects of competition on the cost and quality of inpatient rehabilitation care under prospective payment.
        Health Serv Res. 2010; 45: 1981-2006
        • Dobrez D.
        • Heinemann A.W.
        • Deutsch A.
        • Manheim L.
        • Mallinson T.
        Impact of Medicare's prospective payment system for inpatient rehabilitation facilities on stroke patient outcomes.
        Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2010; 89: 198-204
        • Graham J.E.
        • Deutsch A.
        • O'Connell A.A.
        • Karmarkar A.M.
        • Granger C.V.
        • Ottenbacher K.J.
        Inpatient rehabilitation volume and functional outcomes in stroke, lower extremity fracture, and lower extremity joint replacement.
        Med Care. 2013; 51: 401-412
        • Reistetter T.A.
        • Kuo Y.F.
        • Karmarkar A.M.
        • et al.
        Geographic and facility variation in inpatient stroke rehabilitation: multilevel analysis of functional status.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015; 96: 1248-1254
        • Reker D.M.
        • O'Donnell J.C.
        • Hamilton B.B.
        Stroke rehabilitation outcome variation in Veterans Affairs rehabilitation units: accounting for case-mix.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998; 79: 751-757
        • Strasser D.C.
        • Falconer J.A.
        • Herrin J.S.
        • Bowen S.E.
        • Stevens A.B.
        • Uomoto J.
        Team functioning and patient outcomes in stroke rehabilitation.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005; 86: 403-409
        • Winstein C.J.
        • Stein J.
        • Arena R.
        • et al.
        Guidelines for adult stroke rehabilitation and recovery: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association.
        Stroke. 2016; 47: e98-e169
        • Buntin M.
        • Garten A.
        • Paddock S.
        • Saliba D.
        • Totten M.
        • Escarce J.J.
        How much is postacute care use affected by its availability?.
        Health Serv Res. 2005; 40: 413-434
        • Kane R.L.
        • Lin W.C.
        • Blewett L.A.
        Geographic variation in the use of post-acute care.
        Health Serv Res. 2002; 37: 667-682
        • Jette D.U.
        • Warren R.L.
        • Wirtalla C.
        The relation between therapy intensity and outcomes of rehabilitation in skilled nursing facilities.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005; 86: 373-379
        • Wodchis W.P.
        • Teare G.F.
        • Naglie G.
        • et al.
        Skilled nursing facility rehabilitation and discharge to home after stroke.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005; 86: 442-448
        • Buntin M.B.
        • Colla C.H.
        • Escarce J.J.
        Effects of payment changes on trends in post-acute care.
        Health Serv Res. 2009; 44: 1188-1210
        • Medicare Payment Advisory Commission
        Site-neutral payments for select conditions treated in inpatient rehabilitation facilities and skilled nursing facilities.
        Medicare Payment Advisory Commission, Washington (DC)2014 (Report to Congress: Chapter 6)
        • Dummit L.
        • Marrufo G.
        • Marshall J.
        • et al.
        CMS Bundled Payments for Care Improvement (BPCI) Initiative Models 2-4: Year 1 Evaluation and Monitoring Annual Report. Final Report.
        The Lewin Group, Falls Church2015
        • Weeks W.B.
        • Rauh S.S.
        • Wadsworth E.B.
        • Weinstein J.N.
        The unintended consequences of bundled payments.
        Ann Intern Med. 2013; 158: 62-64