Abstract
Objective
To characterize the relationship between 1-repetition maximum (1-RM) bench press strength
and isometric handgrip strength among breast cancer survivors.
Design
Cross-sectional study.
Setting
Laboratory.
Participants
Community-dwelling breast cancer survivors (N=295).
Interventions
Not applicable.
Main Outcome Measure
1-RM bench press strength was measured with a barbell and exercise bench. Isometric
handgrip strength was measured using an isometric dynamometer, with 3 maximal contractions
of the left and right hands. All measures were conducted by staff with training in
clinical exercise testing.
Results
Among 295 breast cancer survivors, 1-RM bench press strength was 18.2±6.1kg (range,
2.2–43.0kg), and isometric handgrip strength was 23.5±5.8kg (range, 9.0–43.0kg). The
strongest correlate of 1-RM bench press strength was the average isometric handgrip
strength of both hands (r=.399; P<.0001). Mean difference analysis suggested that the average isometric handgrip strength
of both hands overestimated 1-RM bench press strength by 4.7kg (95% limits of agreement,
−8.2 to 17.6kg). In a multivariable linear regression model, the average isometric
handgrip strength of both hands (β=.31; P<.0001) and age (β=−.20; P<.0001) were positively correlated with 1-RM bench press strength (R2=.23).
Conclusions
Isometric handgrip strength is a poor surrogate for 1-RM bench press strength among
breast cancer survivors. 1-RM bench press strength and isometric handgrip strength
quantify distinct components of muscular strength.
Keywords
List of abbreviations:
BMI (body mass index), CI (confidence interval), PAL (Physical Activity and Lymphedema), 1-RM (1-repetition maximum)To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Archives of Physical Medicine and RehabilitationAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- Breast cancer survivors in the United States.Cancer. 2009; 115: 1954-1966
- Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2014.CA Cancer J Clin. 2014; 64: 252-271
- Weight lifting in women with breast-cancer-related lymphedema.N Engl J Med. 2009; 361: 664-673
- Physical activity for cancer survivors: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.BMJ. 2012; 344: e70
- The effects of physical activity on breast cancer survivors after diagnosis.J Cancer Prev. 2013; 18: 193-200
- Experiences of breast cancer survivors participating in a tailored exercise intervention—a qualitative study.Anticancer Res. 2014; 34: 1193-1199
- High-intensity strength training improves quality of life in cancer survivors.Acta Oncol. 2007; 46: 1143-1151
- The effect of resistance training on muscle strength and physical function in older, postmenopausal breast cancer survivors: a randomized controlled trial.J Cancer Surviv. 2012; 6: 189-199
- Physical activity levels before and after a diagnosis of breast carcinoma: the Health, Eating, Activity, and Lifestyle (HEAL) study.Cancer. 2003; 97: 1746-1757
- Reliability of the one-repetition maximum test based on muscle group and gender.J Sports Sci Med. 2012; 11: 221-225
- A comparison of muscle activation between a Smith machine and free weight bench press.J Strength Cond Res. 2010; 24: 779-784
- Effect of training on the relationship between maximal and submaximal strength.Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1993; 25: 132-138
- Injuries during the one repetition maximum assessment in the elderly.J Cardiopulm Rehabil. 1995; 15: 283-287
- Weight lifting for women at risk for breast cancer-related lymphedema: a randomized trial.JAMA. 2010; 304: 2699-2705
- Injuries and muscle soreness during the one repetition maximum assessment in a cardiac rehabilitation population.J Cardiopulm Rehabil. 1999; 19: 52-58
- Effect of two different rest period lengths on the number of repetitions performed during resistance training.J Strength Cond Res. 2007; 21: 1032-1036
- The handgrip strength test as a measure of function in breast cancer survivors: relationship to cancer-related symptoms and physical and physiologic parameters.Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2012; 91: 774-782
- A review of the measurement of grip strength in clinical and epidemiological studies: towards a standardised approach.Age Ageing. 2011; 40: 423-429
- [Comparison of the effectiveness of isokinetic vs isometric therapeutic exercise in patients with osteoarthritis of knee].Reumatol Clin. 2012; 8 ([Spanish]): 10-14
- Optimal Jamar dynamometer handle position to assess maximal isometric hand grip strength in epidemiological studies.J Hand Surg [Am]. 2012; 37: 2368-2373
- Weight lifting and physical function among survivors of breast cancer: a post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial.J Clin Oncol. 2015; 33: 2184-2189
- Physical Activity and Lymphedema (the PAL trial): assessing the safety of progressive strength training in breast cancer survivors.Contemp Clin Trials. 2009; 30: 233-245
- Prescription and adherence to lymphedema self-care modalities among women with breast cancer-related lymphedema.Support Care Cancer. 2014; 22: 135-143
- Correlates of resistance training in post-treatment breast cancer survivors.Support Care Cancer. 2014; 22: 2757-2766
- Is it safe and efficacious for women with lymphedema secondary to breast cancer to lift heavy weights during exercise: a randomised controlled trial.J Cancer Surviv. 2013; 7: 413-424
- The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.Med Care. 1992; 30: 473-483
- Correlates of upper and lower body muscular strength in children.J Strength Cond Res. 2008; 22: 1339-1346
- A comparison of strength and muscle mass increases during resistance training in young women.Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1998; 77: 170-175
- American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Progression models in resistance training for healthy adults.Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002; 34: 364-380
- Using bench press load to predict upper body exercise loads in physically active individuals.J Sports Sci Med. 2013; 12: 38-43
- Muscle strength: clinical and prognostic value of hand-grip dynamometry.Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2015; 18: 465-470
- Hand grip strength: age and gender stratified normative data in a population-based study.BMC Res Notes. 2011; 4: 127
- Prognostic value of grip strength: findings from the Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology (PURE) study.Lancet. 2015; 386: 266-273
- Dynamometer measurements of hand-grip strength predict multiple outcomes.Percept Mot Skills. 2001; 93: 323-328
- Aerobic capacity and upper limb strength are reduced in women diagnosed with breast cancer: a systematic review.J Physiother. 2014; 60: 189-200
- A qualitative synthesis of trials promoting physical activity behaviour change among post-treatment breast cancer survivors.J Cancer Surviv. 2013; 7: 570-581
- Effects of exercise dose and type during breast cancer chemotherapy: multicenter randomized trial.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013; 105: 1821-1832
- Effects of aerobic and resistance exercise in breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.J Clin Oncol. 2007; 25: 4396-4404
- American College of Sports Medicine roundtable on exercise guidelines for cancer survivors.Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010; 42: 1409-1426
- A prospective surveillance model for rehabilitation for women with breast cancer.Cancer. 2012; 118: 2191-2200
- Integrating a prospective surveillance model for rehabilitation into breast cancer survivorship care.Cancer. 2012; 118: 2201-2206
Article Info
Publication History
Published online: August 16, 2016
Footnotes
Supported by the National Cancer Institute (grant no. R01-CA106851).
Clinical Trial Registration No.: NCT00194363.
Disclosures: none.
Identification
Copyright
© 2016 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine