Advertisement

Quantifying Change During Outpatient Stroke Rehabilitation: A Retrospective Regression Analysis

Published:April 21, 2016DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2016.03.021

      Abstract

      Objective

      To examine change and individual trajectories for balance, upper extremity motor capacity, and mobility in people poststroke during the time they received outpatient therapies.

      Design

      Retrospective analyses of an observational cohort using hierarchical linear modeling.

      Setting

      Outpatient rehabilitation.

      Participants

      Persons poststroke (N=366).

      Interventions

      Usual outpatient physical and occupational therapy.

      Main Outcomes Measures

      Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), and walking speed were used to assess the 3 domains. Initial scores at the start of outpatient therapy (intercepts), rate of change during outpatient therapy (slopes), and covariance between slopes and intercepts were modeled as random effects. Additional variables modeled as fixed effects were duration (months of outpatient therapy), time (days poststroke), age (y), and inpatient status (if the patient went to an inpatient rehabilitation facility [IRF]).

      Results

      A patient with average age and time started at 37 points on the BBS with a change of 1.8 points per month, at 35 points on the ARAT with a change of 2 points per month, and with a walking speed of .59m/s with a change of .09m/s per month. When controlling for other variables, patients started with lower scores on the BBS and ARAT or had slower walking speeds at admission if they started outpatient therapy later than average or went to an IRF.

      Conclusions

      Patients generally improved over the course of outpatient therapy, but there was considerable variability in individual trajectories. Average rates of change across all 3 domains were small.

      Keywords

      List of abbreviations:

      10MWT (10-m walk test), AIC (Akaike information criterion), ARAT (Action Research Arm Test), BBS (Berg Balance Scale), IRF (inpatient rehabilitation facility)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Kochanek K.D.
        • Murphy S.L.
        • Xu J.Q.
        • Arias E.
        Mortality in the United States, 2013.
        NCHS Data Brief. 2014; 178: 1-8
        • Mozaffarian D.
        • Benjamin E.J.
        • Go A.S.
        • et al.
        Heart disease and stroke statistics–2015 update: a report from the american heart association.
        Circulation. 2015; 131: e29-e322
        • Duncan P.W.
        • Zorowitz R.
        • Bates B.
        • et al.
        Management of adult stroke rehabilitation care: a clinical practice guideline.
        Stroke. 2005; 36: e100-e143
        • Legg L.
        • Langhorne P.
        Outpatient Service Trialists. Rehabilitation therapy services for stroke patients living at home: systematic review of randomised trials.
        Lancet. 2004; 363: 352-356
        • Quinn T.J.
        • Paolucci S.
        • Sunnerhagen K.S.
        • et al.
        Evidence-based stroke r-ehabilitation: an expanded guidance document from the european stroke organisation (eso) guidelines for management of ischaemic stroke and transient ischaemic attack 2008.
        J Rehabil Med. 2009; 41: 99-111
        • Duncan P.W.
        • Goldstein L.B.
        • Matchar D.
        • Divine G.W.
        • Feussner J.
        Measurement of motor recovery after stroke. Outcome assessment and sample size requirements.
        Stroke. 1992; 23: 1084-1089
        • Jorgensen H.S.
        • Nakayama H.
        • Raaschou H.O.
        • Olsen T.S.
        Recovery of walking function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen Stroke Study.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995; 76: 27-32
        • Tilling K.
        • Sterne J.A.
        • Rudd A.G.
        • Glass T.A.
        • Wityk R.J.
        • Wolfe C.D.
        A new method for predicting recovery after stroke.
        Stroke. 2001; 32: 2867-2873
        • Winters C.
        • van Wegen E.E.
        • Daffertshofer A.
        • Kwakkel G.
        Generalizability of the proportional recovery model for the upper extremity after an ischemic stroke.
        Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2015; 29: 614-622
        • Lang C.E.
        • Bland M.D.
        • Connor L.T.
        • et al.
        The brain recovery core: building a system of organized stroke rehabilitation and outcomes assessment across the continuum of care.
        J Neurol Phys Ther. 2011; 35: 194-201
        • Harris P.A.
        • Taylor R.
        • Thielke R.
        • Payne J.
        • Gonzalez N.
        • Conde J.G.
        Research electronic data capture (redcap)–a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.
        J Biomed Inform. 2009; 42: 377-381
        • Lang C.E.
        • Macdonald J.R.
        • Reisman D.S.
        • et al.
        Observation of amounts of movement practice provided during stroke rehabilitation.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009; 90: 1692-1698
        • Bland M.D.
        • Sturmoski A.
        • Whitson M.
        • et al.
        Clinician adherence to a standardized assessment battery across settings and disciplines in a poststroke rehabilitation population.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013; 94: 1048-1053.e1041
        • Berg K.
        • Wood-Dauphinee S.
        • Williams J.I.
        The balance scale: reliability assessment with elderly residents and patients with an acute stroke.
        Scand J Rehabil Med. 1995; 27: 27-36
        • Berg K.O.
        • Wood-Dauphinee S.L.
        • Williams J.I.
        • Maki B.
        Measuring balance in the elderly: validation of an instrument.
        Can J Public Health. 1992; 83: S7-S11
        • Lyle R.C.
        A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research.
        Int J Rehabil Res. 1981; 4: 483-492
        • Yozbatiran N.
        • Der-Yeghiaian L.
        • Cramer S.C.
        A standardized approach to performing the action research arm test.
        Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008; 22: 78-90
        • Dean C.M.
        • Richards C.L.
        • Malouin F.
        Walking speed over 10 metres overestimates locomotor capacity after stroke.
        Clin Rehabil. 2001; 15: 415-421
        • Dobkin B.H.
        Short-distance walking speed and timed walking distance: redundant measures for clinical trials?.
        Neurology. 2006; 66: 584-586
        • Finch E..
        • Brooks D.
        • Stratford P.W.
        • Mayo N.E.
        Physical rehabilitation outcome measures.
        Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Hamilton2002
        • Schmid A.
        • Duncan P.W.
        • Studenski S.
        • et al.
        Improvements in speed-based gait classifications are meaningful.
        Stroke. 2007; 38: 2096-2100
      1. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Medicare benefit policy manual. Chapter 1, section 110. 2009.

        • Snijders T.A.
        • Bosker R.J.
        Multilevel analysis: an introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling.
        SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks2012
        • Singer J.D.
        • Willet J.B.
        Applied longitudinal data anlaysis: modeling change and event occurence.
        Oxford Univ Pr, New York2003
        • Long J.D.
        Longitudinal data analysis for the behavioral sciences using R.
        SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks2012
      2. Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker BM, Walker S. _lme: linear mixed-effects models using eigen and s4_. 2014.

      3. Wickham H, Francois R. Dplyr: A grammar of data manipulation. 2015.

        • Veerbeek J.M.
        • Kwakkel G.
        • van Wegen E.E.
        • Ket J.C.
        • Heymans M.W.
        Early prediction of outcome of activities of daily living after stroke: a systematic review.
        Stroke. 2011; 42: 1482-1488
        • Duncan P.W.
        • Lai S.M.
        • Keighley J.
        Defining post-stroke recovery: implications for design and interpretation of drug trials.
        Neuropharmacology. 2000; 39: 835-841
        • Jorgensen H.S.
        • Nakayama H.
        • Raaschou H.O.
        • Vive-Larsen J.
        • Stoier M.
        • Olsen T.S.
        Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke. Part II: Time course of recovery. The Copenhagen Stroke Study.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995; 76: 406-412
        • Kwakkel G.
        • Kollen B.
        • Lindeman E.
        Understanding the pattern of functional recovery after stroke: facts and theories.
        Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2004; 22: 281-299
        • Shelton F.D.
        • Volpe B.T.
        • Reding M.
        Motor impairment as a predictor of functional recovery and guide to rehabilitation treatment after stroke.
        Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2001; 15: 229-237
        • Keith R.A.
        • Granger C.V.
        • Hamilton B.B.
        • Sherwin F.S.
        The functional independence measure: a new tool for rehabilitation.
        Adv Clin Rehabil. 1987; 1: 6-18
        • Lang C.E.
        • Bland M.D.
        • Bailey R.R.
        • Schaefer S.Y.
        • Birkenmeier R.L.
        Assessment of upper extremity impairment, function, and activity after stroke: foundations for clinical decision making.
        J Hand Ther. 2013; 26 (quiz 115): 104-114
        • Goldie P.A.
        • Matyas T.A.
        • Evans O.M.
        Deficit and change in gait velocity during rehabilitation after stroke.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996; 77: 1074-1082
        • Wade D.T.
        • Wood V.A.
        • Heller A.
        • Maggs J.
        • Langton Hewer R.
        Walking after stroke. Measurement and recovery over the first 3 months.
        Scand J Rehabil Med. 1987; 19: 25-30
        • Nudo R.J.
        Recovery after brain injury: mechanisms and principles.
        Front Hum Neurosci. 2013; 7: 887
        • Overman J.J.
        • Carmichael S.T.
        Plasticity in the injured brain: more than molecules matter.
        Neuroscientist. 2014; 20: 15-28
        • Stevenson T.J.
        Detecting change in patients with stroke using the berg balance scale.
        Aust J Physiother. 2001; 47: 29-38
        • Liston R.A.
        • Brouwer B.J.
        Reliability and validity of measures obtained from stroke patients using the balance master.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996; 77: 425-430
        • Lang C.E.
        • Edwards D.F.
        • Birkenmeier R.L.
        • Dromerick A.W.
        Estimating minimal clinically important differences of upper-extremity measures early after stroke.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008; 89: 1693-1700
        • van der Lee J.H.
        • Beckerman H.
        • Lankhorst G.J.
        • Bouter L.M.
        The responsiveness of the action research arm test and the fugl-meyer assessment scale in chronic stroke patients.
        J Rehabil Med. 2001; 33: 110-113
        • Tilson J.K.
        • Sullivan K.J.
        • Cen S.Y.
        • et al.
        Meaningful gait speed improvement during the first 60 days poststroke: minimal clinically important difference.
        Phys Ther. 2010; 90: 196-208
        • Perera S.
        • Mody S.H.
        • Woodman R.C.
        • Studenski S.A.
        Meaningful change and responsiveness in common physical performance measures in older adults.
        J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006; 54: 743-749