Advertisement

Understanding and Overcoming Barriers to Upper Limb Surgical Reconstruction After Tetraplegia: The Need for Interdisciplinary Collaboration

  • Vandana Punj
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author Vandana Punj, MD, Spinal Cord Injury Center (128), VA Palo Alto Health Care System, 3801 Miranda Ave, Palo Alto, CA 94305.
    Affiliations
    Spinal Cord Injury Service, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA

    Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Catherine Curtin
    Affiliations
    Spinal Cord Injury Service, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA

    Division of Hand and Plastic Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA
    Search for articles by this author

      Abstract

      There are approximately 300,000 persons with spinal cord injury living in the United States, and nearly 60% of these persons have suffered tetraplegia with resultant alterations in body function, activity, and therefore participation. Restoring hand function can improve independence, and various studies have shown that persons with tetraplegia rate restoration of arm and hand function higher than bowel and bladder control, walking, or sexuality. There are conservative options to improve upper limb function in this population (eg, orthoses, neuroprostheses). Surgical interventions are also available, and 70% of surgical patients report satisfaction and improvement in various activities of daily living after surgery to restore arm and hand function. Despite these positive surgical outcomes, <10% of the eligible population of 60% to 70% undergo tendon transfer surgery to restore function. Underutilization of surgical interventions can be explained by population-, provider-, and health care systems–specific barriers. With further education of providers and patients and team building across disciplines these barriers can be overcome, ultimately leading to reduced disability and improved quality of life for persons with tetraplegia.

      Keywords

      List of abbreviations:

      ADL (activities of daily living), ICSHT (International Classification for Surgery of the Hand in Tetraplegia), ISNCSCI (International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury), SCI (spinal cord injury)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

      1. American Spinal Injury Association. International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury, revised 2011; Atlanta, GA. Revised 2011, updated 2015.

        • University of Alabama at Birmingham
        Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Facts and Figures at a Glance.
        2014 (Available at:) (Accessed April 27, 2015)
        • Lee B.B.
        • Cripps R.A.
        • Fitzharris M.
        • Wing P.C.
        The global map for traumatic spinal cord injury epidemiology: update 2011, global incidence rate.
        Spinal Cord. 2014; 52: 110-116
        • Thorsen R.
        • Binda L.
        • Chiaramonte S.
        • et al.
        Correlation among lesion level, muscle strength and hand function in cervical spinal cord injury.
        Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2014; 50: 31-38
        • Snoek G.J.
        • IJzerman M.J.
        • Hermens H.J.
        • Maxwell D.
        • Biering-Sorensen F.
        Survey of the needs of patients with spinal cord injury: impact and priority for improvement in hand function in tetraplegics.
        Spinal Cord. 2004; 42: 526-532
        • Wagner J.P.
        • Curtin C.M.
        • Gater D.R.
        • Chung K.C.
        Perceptions of people with tetraplegia regarding surgery to improve upper-extremity function.
        J Hand Surg [Am]. 2007; 32: 483-490
        • Anderson K.D.
        Targeting recovery: priorities of the spinal cord-injured population.
        J Neurotrauma. 2004; 21: 1371-1383
        • Freehafer A.A.
        • Mast W.A.
        Transfer of the brachioradialis to improve wrist extension in high spinal-cord injury.
        J Hand Surg [Am]. 1967; 49: 648-652
        • Lamb D.W.
        • Landry R.
        The hand in quadriplegia.
        Hand. 1971; 3: 31-37
        • Leclercq C.
        Surgical rehabilitation for the weaker patients (groups 1 and 2 of the International Classification).
        Hand Clin. 2002; 18: 461-479
        • Zancolli E.A.
        History of surgery in the rehabilitation of the tetraplegic upper limb.
        Hand Clin. 2002; 18: 369-376
      2. Moberg E, McDowell CL, MD, House JH. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Surgical Rehabilitation of the Upper Limb in Quadriplegia; 1984; Minneapolis (MN).

        • Waters R.L.
        • Sie I.H.
        • Gellman H.
        • Tognella M.
        Functional hand surgery following tetraplegia.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996; 77: 86-94
        • Hentz V.R.
        • Leclercq C.
        The management of the upper limb in incomplete lesions of the cervical spinal cord.
        Hand Clin. 2008; 24 (vi): 175-184
        • Campagnolo D.I.
        • Kirshblum S.
        • Nash M.S.
        • Heary R.F.
        • Gorman P.H.
        Spinal cord medicine.
        Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia2011
        • Keith M.W.
        • Peljovich A.
        Surgical treatments to restore function control in spinal cord injury.
        in: Handbook of clinical neurology. Vol 109. Elsevier, Amsterdam2012: 167-179
        • Squitieri L.
        • Chung K.C.
        Current utilization of reconstructive upper limb surgery in tetraplegia.
        Hand Clin. 2008; 24 (v): 169-173
        • Moberg E.
        Surgical treatment for absent single-hand grip and elbow extension in quadriplegia. Principles and preliminary experience.
        J Hand [Am]. 1975; 57: 196-206
        • Hentz V.R.
        • Brown M.
        • Keoshian L.A.
        Upper limb reconstruction in quadriplegia: functional assessment and proposed treatment modifications.
        J Hand Surg [Am]. 1983; 8: 119-131
        • Strauss N.L.
        • James M.A.
        Tetraplegia: current literature, research and concepts.
        Curr Orthop Pract. 2008; 19: 481-484
        • Wuolle K.S.
        • Bryden A.M.
        • Peckham P.H.
        • Murray P.K.
        • Keith M.
        Satisfaction with upper-extremity surgery in individuals with tetraplegia.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003; 84: 1145-1149
        • Forner-Cordero I.
        • Mudarra-García J.
        • Forner-Valero J.V.
        • Vilar-de-la-Peña R.
        The role of upper limb surgery in tetraplegia.
        Spinal Cord. 2003; 41: 90-96
        • Meiners T.
        • Abel R.
        • Lindel K.
        • Mesecke U.
        Improvements in activities of daily living following functional hand surgery for treatment of lesions to the cervical spinal cord: self-assessment by patients.
        Spinal Cord. 2002; 40: 574
        • Cizmar I.
        • Zalesak B.
        • Pilny J.
        • Drac P.
        • Fialova J.
        Possible restorations of the upper extremity motion in tetraplegic patients - 5-year clinical experience.
        Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2006; 150: 313-319
        • Curtin C.M.
        • Gater D.R.
        • Chung K.C.
        Upper extremity reconstruction in the tetraplegic population, a national epidemiologic study.
        J Hand Surg [Am]. 2005; 30: 94-99
        • Fox P.M.
        • Suarez P.
        • Hentz V.R.
        • Curtin C.M.
        Access to surgical upper extremity care for people with tetraplegia: an international perspective.
        Spinal Cord. 2015; 53: 302-305
        • Cooper C.
        Why some patients choose not to have tendon transfer surgery.
        (International Meeting on Upper Limb in Tetraplegia)2007 (Available at:) (Accessed April 24, 2015)
        • Dunn J.A.
        • Hay-Smith E.J.
        • Whitehead L.C.
        • Keeling S.
        Issues influencing the decision to have upper limb surgery for people with tetraplegia.
        Spinal Cord. 2012; 50: 844-847
        • Weiss A.A.
        Contemporary trends in management of the upper limb in tetraplegia: a multinational perspective.
        Elsevier, 2008
        • Curtin C.M.
        • Hayward R.A.
        • Kim H.M.
        • Gater D.R.
        • Chung K.C.
        Physician perceptions of upper extremity reconstruction for the person with tetraplegia.
        J Hand Surg [Am]. 2005; 30: 87-93
        • Saito H.
        Evolution of surgery for tetraplegic hands in Japan.
        Hand Clin. 2002; 18 (viii): 535-539
        • Raja Sabapathy S.
        Management of complex tissue injuries and replantation across the world.
        Injury. 2006; 37: 1057-1060
        • Bryden A.M.
        • Wuolle K.S.
        • Murray P.K.
        • Peckham P.H.
        Perceived outcomes and utilization of upper extremity surgical reconstruction in individuals with tetraplegia at model spinal cord injury systems.
        Spinal Cord. 2004; 42: 169-176
        • Weiss A.A.
        Contemporary trends in management of the upper limb in tetraplegia: a multinational perspective.
        Hand Clin. 2008; 24 (v): 157-160
        • Bryden A.M.
        • Peljovich A.E.
        • Hoyen H.A.
        • Nemunaitis G.
        • Kilgore K.L.
        • Keith M.W.
        Surgical restoration of arm and hand function in people with tetraplegia.
        Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2012; 18: 43-49