Advertisement
Original research| Volume 96, ISSUE 12, P2184-2193, December 2015

Exploratory Validation of a Multidimensional Power Wheelchair Outcomes Toolkit

  • W. Ben Mortenson
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author W. Ben Mortenson, PhD, University of British Columbia, T325-2211 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, Canada, V6T 2B5.
    Affiliations
    Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada

    International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries, University of British Columbia Faculty of Medicine and Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada

    Rehabilitation Research Program, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada
    Search for articles by this author
  • Louise Demers
    Affiliations
    School of Rehabilitation, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada

    Research Center of the Institut universitaire de gériatrie de Montréal, School of Rehabilitation, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
    Search for articles by this author
  • Paula W. Rushton
    Affiliations
    School of Rehabilitation, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada

    Marie Enfant Rehabilitation Center, Sainte-Justine University Hospital Research Center, Montréal, PQ, Canada
    Search for articles by this author
  • Claudine Auger
    Affiliations
    School of Rehabilitation, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada

    Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal, Montréal, PQ, Canada
    Search for articles by this author
  • Francois Routhier
    Affiliations
    Department of Rehabilitation, Laval University, Quebec City, PQ, Canada

    Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration, Quebec City Rehabilitation Institute, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
    Search for articles by this author
  • William C. Miller
    Affiliations
    Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada

    International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries, University of British Columbia Faculty of Medicine and Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada

    Rehabilitation Research Program, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada
    Search for articles by this author
Published:September 21, 2015DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2015.08.430

      Abstract

      Objective

      To evaluate the relation among the measures in a power wheelchair outcomes toolkit.

      Design

      We performed path analysis of cross-sectional data from self-report questionnaires and 1 objective measure.

      Setting

      Six sites.

      Participants

      A convenience sample of power wheelchair users (N=128). Most (n=69; 53.9%) participants were women. Multiple sclerosis and spinal cord injury/disease were the most common diagnoses.

      Interventions

      Not applicable.

      Main Outcome Measures

      The power wheelchair version of the Wheelchair Skills Test version 4.1 was used to carry out an objective evaluation of capacity to perform 32 wheelchair skills. The Late-Life Disability Index measured frequency of participation in 16 life activities. The Life-Space Assessment measured independence, extent, and frequency of mobility. The Assistive Technology Outcomes Profile for Mobility was used to assess perceived difficulty performing activity and participation using assistive technology. The Wheelchair Use Confidence Scale for powered wheelchair users captured users' self-efficacy with wheelchair use.

      Results

      Wheelchair confidence was independently associated with less difficulty with activity (β=.028, P=.002) and participation (β=.225, P<.001), increased life space (β=.095, P<.003), and greater wheelchair skills (β=.30, P<.001). Less perceived difficulty with activity was independently associated with increased frequency of participation (β=.55, P<.001). Life-space mobility was independently associated with increased frequency of participation (β=.167, P<.001). Less difficulty with participation was independently associated with greater life-space mobility (β=.59, P<.001) and greater frequency of participation (β=.13, P<.001).

      Conclusions

      This study provides empirical support for the measures included as part of the power wheelchair outcomes toolkit. They appear to provide complementary information on a variety of constructs related to power wheelchair use.

      Keywords

      List of abbreviations:

      IADL (instrumental activities of daily living), ICF (International Classification of Function, Disability and Health), LLDI (Late-Life Disability Index), LSA (Life-Space Assessment), NFI (Normed Fit Index), RMSEA (root mean square error of approximation)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

      1. Statistics Canada. The 2006 participation and activity limitation survey: disability in Canada. Ottawa: Statistics Canada; 2006. Report No. 89-628-X.

        • Seeman T.E.
        • Merkin S.S.
        • Crimmins E.M.
        • et al.
        Disability trends among older Americans: national health and nutrition examination surveys, 1988-1994 and 1999-2004.
        Am J Public Health. 2010; 100: 100-107
        • Gardener E.A.
        • Huppert F.A.
        • Guralnik J.M.
        • et al.
        Middle-aged and mobility-limited: prevalence of disability and symptom attributions in a national survey.
        J Gen Intern Med. 2006; 21: 1091-1096
        • Batavia M.
        The wheelchair evaluation: a clinician's guide.
        Jones & Bartlett Learning, Mississauga2009
        • Mortenson W.B.
        • Miller W.C.
        • Boily J.
        • et al.
        Perceptions of power mobility use and safety within residential facilities.
        Can J Occup Ther. 2005; 72: 142-152
        • Auger C.
        • Demers L.
        • Gelinas I.
        • et al.
        Powered mobility for middle-aged and older adults: systematic review of outcomes and appraisal of published evidence.
        Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2008; 87: 666-680
        • Mortenson W.B.
        • Miller W.C.
        The wheelchair procurement process: perspectives of clients and prescribers.
        Can J Occup Ther. 2008; 75: 167-175
        • Garber S.L.
        • Bunzel R.
        • Monga T.N.
        Wheelchair utilization and satisfaction following cerebral vascular accident.
        J Rehabil Res Dev. 2002; 39: 521-534
        • Mortenson W.B.
        • Hurd Clarke L.
        • Best K.
        Prescribers’ experiences with powered mobility prescription among older adults.
        Am J Occup Ther. 2013; 67: 100-107
        • Hastings J.
        • Robins H.
        • Griffiths Y.
        • et al.
        The differences in self-esteem, function, and participation between adults with low cervical motor tetraplegia who use power or manual wheelchairs.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011; 92: 1785-1788
        • Sund T.
        • Iwarsson S.
        • Anttila H.
        • Brandt A.
        Effectiveness of powered mobility devices in enabling community mobility-related participation: a prospective study among people with mobility restrictions.
        PMR. 2015; : 1-12
        • Harris F.
        Conceptual issues in the measurement of participation among wheeled mobility device users.
        Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2007; 2: 137-148
        • Cook A.M.
        • Hussey S.M.
        Seating systems as extrinsic enablers for assistive technologies. Assistive technologies principles and practice.
        Mosby, St Louis2002
        • World Health Organization
        Towards a common language for functioning, disability and health: ICF.
        WHO, Geneva2002
        • Routhier F.
        • Claude V.
        • Johanne D.
        • Sylvie N.
        Mobility of wheelchair users: a proposed performance assessment framework.
        Disabil Rehabil. 2003; 25: 19-34
        • Kirby R.L.
        • Smith C.
        • Parker K.
        • et al.
        Wheelchair Skills Test Manual version 4.2.
        April 3, 2013 (Available at:) (Accessed November 4, 2014)
        • Jette A.M.
        • Haley S.M.
        • Coster W.J.
        • et al.
        Late life function and disability instrument I. development and evaluation of the disability component.
        J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2002; 57: M209-M216
        • Baker P.S.
        • Bodner E.V.
        • Allman R.M.
        Measuring life-space mobility in community-dwelling older adults.
        J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003; 51: 1610-1614
        • Hammel J.
        • Southall K.
        • Jutai J.
        • et al.
        Evaluating use and outcomes of mobility technology: a multiple stakeholder analysis.
        Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2013; 8: 294-304
      2. Rushton PW, Smith E, Miller WC, Vaughan K. Measuring wheelchair confidence among power wheelchair users: an adaptation of the WheelCon-M using focus groups and a think aloud process. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2015 Jun 30 [Epub ahead of print].

        • Bandura A.
        Self-efficacy: the exercise of control.
        W.H. Freeman, New York1997
        • Sakakibara B.M.
        • Miller W.C.
        • Eng J.J.
        • et al.
        Preliminary examination of the relation between participation and confidence in older manual wheelchair users.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013; 94: 791-794
        • Mortenson W.B.
        • Miller W.C.
        • Backman C.L.
        • et al.
        Association between mobility, participation, and wheelchair-related factors in long-term care residents who use wheelchairs as their primary means of mobility.
        J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012; 60: 1310-1315
        • Sakakibara B.M.
        • Miller W.C.
        • Souza M.
        • et al.
        Wheelchair skills training to improve confidence with using a manual wheelchair among older adults: a pilot study.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013; 94: 1031-1037
        • Samuelsson K.
        • Wressle E.
        Powered wheelchairs and scooters for outdoor mobility: a pilot study on costs and benefits.
        Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2013; 9: 330-334
        • Löfqvist C.
        • Pettersson C.
        • Iwarsson S.
        • et al.
        Mobility and mobility-related participation outcomes of powered wheelchair and scooter interventions after 4-months and 1-year use.
        Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2012; 7: 211-218
        • Auger C.
        • Demers L.
        • Gélinas I.
        • et al.
        Life-space mobility of middle-aged and older adults at various stages of usage of power mobility devices.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010; 91: 765-773
        • Pettersson I.
        • Ahlström G.
        • Törnquist K.
        The value of an outdoor powered wheelchair with regard to the quality of life of persons with stroke: a follow-up study.
        Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2007; 19: 143-153
      3. Rushton PW, Miller WC, Demers L, Canwheel Research Team. Measuring power wheelchair outcomes: psychometric properties of a new toolkit. 41st annual scientific and educational meeting of the Canadian Association on Gerontology; 2012 Oct 18-20; Vancouver (Canada).

        • Auger C.
        • Demers l
        • Gélinas I.
        • et al.
        Development of a French-Canadian version of the Life-Space Assessment (LSA-F): content validity, reliability and applicability for power mobility device users.
        Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2009; 4: 31-41
        • Kline R.B.
        Principles and practice of structural equation modeling.
        2nd ed. Guilford Pr, New York2005
        • Heitjan D.F.
        • Srabashi B.
        Distinguishing “Missing at Random and “Missing Completely at Random.”.
        Am Stat. 1996; 50: 207-213
        • Byrne B.
        A primer of LISREL: basic applications and programming for confirmatory factor analytic models, 1989.
        Springer, New York1994
        • Sivo S.A.
        • Fan X.
        • Witta E.L.
        • et al.
        The search for “optimal” cutoff properties: fit index criteria in structural equation modeling.
        J Exp Educ. 2006; 74: 267-288
        • Melzer I.
        • Kurz I.
        Self reported function and disability in late life: a comparison between recurrent fallers and non-fallers.
        Disabil Rehabil. 2009; 31: 791-798
        • Mortenson W.B.
        • Miller W.C.
        • Backman C.L.
        • et al.
        Predictors of mobility among wheelchair using residents in long-term care.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011; 92: 1587-1593
        • Kirby R.L.
        • Dupuis D.J.
        • MacPhee A.H.
        • et al.
        The Wheelchair Skills Test (version 2.4): measurement properties.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004; 85: 794-804
        • Sakakibara B.M.
        Towards an understanding of self-efficacy with using a manual wheelchair [dissertation].
        Univ of British Columbia, Vancouver2013
        • Rushton P.W.
        • Miller W.C.
        • Kirby R.L.
        • et al.
        Measure for the assessment of confidence with manual wheelchair use (WheelCon-M) version 2.1: reliability and validity.
        J Rehabil Med. 2013; 45: 61-67
        • Best K.L.
        • Kirby R.L.
        • Smith C.
        • et al.
        Wheelchair skills training for community-based manual wheelchair users: a randomized controlled trial.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005; 86: 2316-2323
        • Mountain A.D.
        • Kirby R.L.
        • Smith C.
        • et al.
        Powered wheelchair skills training for persons with stroke: a randomized controlled trial.
        Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2014; 93: 1031-1043
        • Mortenson W.B.
        • Miller W.C.
        • Miller-Pogar J.
        Measuring wheelchair intervention outcomes: development of the wheelchair outcome measure.
        Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2007; 2: 275-285