Abstract
Objective
Design
Setting
Participants
Interventions
Main Outcome Measures
Results
Conclusions
Keywords
List of abbreviations:
ARAT (Action Research Arm Test), CIMT (constraint-induced movement therapy), FMA (Fugl-Meyer Assessment), MCID (minimal clinically important difference), MG (mesh glove), MT (mirror therapy), UE (upper extremity), UE-FMA (Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer Assessment)Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Archives of Physical Medicine and RehabilitationReferences
- Global and regional burden of stroke during 1990-2010: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010.Lancet. 2014; 383: 245-254
- Clinical practice: rehabilitation after stroke.N Engl J Med. 2005; 352: 1677-1684
- Rehabilitation of hemiparesis after stroke with a mirror.Lancet. 1999; 353: 2035-2036
- Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke.Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993; 74: 347-354
- Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial.JAMA. 2006; 296: 2095-2104
- Robot training enhanced motor outcome in patients with stroke maintained over 3 years.Neurology. 1999; 53: 1874-1876
- Robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper-limb impairment after stroke.N Engl J Med. 2010; 362: 1772-1783
- Interventions for improving upper limb function after stroke.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014; 11: CD010820
- Constraint-induced movement therapy.Stroke. 2004; 35: 2699-2701
- Active finger extension predicts outcomes after constraint-induced movement therapy for individuals with hemiparesis after stroke.Stroke. 2005; 36: 1172-1177
- Revisiting constraint-induced movement therapy: are we too smitten with the mitten? Is all nonuse “learned”? and other quandaries.Phys Ther. 2007; 87: 1212-1223
- Dose-response relationship of robot-assisted stroke motor rehabilitation: the impact of initial motor status.Stroke. 2012; 43: 2729-2734
- Recovery of hand function with robot-assisted therapy in acute stroke patients: a randomized-controlled trial.Int J Rehabil Res. 2014; 37: 236-242
- Motor recovery and cortical reorganization after mirror therapy in chronic stroke patients: a phase II randomized controlled trial.Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011; 25: 223-233
- Mirror therapy for improving motor function after stroke.Stroke. 2013; 44: e1-2
- Effects of mirror therapy on motor and sensory recovery in chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial.Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013; 94: 1023-1030
- Upper extremity interventions.in: Evidence-based review of stroke rehabilitation. Evidence-Based Review of Stroke Rehabilitation, London, Ontario, Canada2013: 1-163
- Constraint-induced movement therapy: from history to plasticity.Expert Rev Neurother. 2012; 12: 191-198
- Predictors of upper limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clin Rehabil. 2012; 26: 291-313
- Predicting functional gains in a stroke trial.Stroke. 2007; 38: 2108-2114
- Arm function after stroke: neurophysiological correlates and recovery mechanisms assessed by transcranial magnetic stimulation.Clin Neurophysiol. 2006; 117: 1641-1659
- The EXCITE Trial: predicting a clinically meaningful Motor Activity Log outcome.Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008; 22: 486-493
- Potential predictors of motor and functional outcomes after distributed constraint-induced therapy for patients with stroke.Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009; 23: 336-342
- Ability of three motor measures to predict functional outcomes reported by stroke patients after rehabilitation.NeuroRehabilitation. 2012; 30: 267-275
- A standardized approach to the Fugl-Meyer assessment and its implications for clinical trials.Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2013; 27: 732-741
- Combining afferent stimulation and mirror therapy for rehabilitating motor function, motor control, ambulation, and daily functions after stroke.Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2014; 28: 153-162
- Effects of constraint-induced therapy versus bilateral arm training on motor performance, daily functions, and quality of life in stroke survivors.Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009; 23: 441-448
- Constraint-induced therapy versus dose-matched control intervention to improve motor ability, basic/extended daily functions, and quality of life in stroke.Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009; 23: 160-165
- Robot-assisted arm trainer for the passive and active practice of bilateral forearm and wrist movements in hemiparetic subjects.Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003; 84: 915-920
- Fugl-Meyer assessment of sensorimotor function after stroke: standardized training procedure for clinical practice and clinical trials.Stroke. 2011; 42: 427-432
- Clinically important differences for the upper-extremity Fugl-Meyer Scale in people with minimal to moderate impairment due to chronic stroke.Phys Ther. 2012; 92: 791-798
- Three-dimensional, task-specific robot therapy of the arm after stroke: a multicentre, parallel-group randomised trial.Lancet Neurol. 2014; 13: 159-166
- The intra- and interrater reliability of the Action Research Arm Test: a practical test of upper extremity function in patients with stroke.Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001; 82: 14-19
- Inter-rater reliability and validity of the Action Research Arm Test in stroke patients.Age Ageing. 1998; 27: 107-113
- Power and sample size.in: Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice. 3rd ed. Pearson/Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River2009: 705-719
- What you see may not be what you get: a brief, nontechnical introduction to overfitting in regression-type models.Psychosom Med. 2004; 66: 411-421
- The problem of overfitting.J Chem Inf Comput Sci. 2004; 44: 1-12
- Pilot study of a robotic protocol to treat shoulder subluxation in patients with chronic stroke.J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2013; 10: 88
- Does trunk, arm, or leg control correlate best with overall function in stroke subjects?.Top Stroke Rehabil. 2013; 20: 62-67
- Comparison of bilateral and unilateral training for upper extremity hemiparesis in stroke.Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009; 23: 945-953
- A placebo-controlled trial of constraint-induced movement therapy for upper extremity after stroke.Stroke. 2006; 37: 1045-1049
- Constraint-induced movement therapy combined with conventional neurorehabilitation techniques in chronic stroke patients with plegic hands: a case series.Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013; 94: 86-94
- Effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review.Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008; 22: 111-121
- Predictors of motor, daily function, and quality-of-life improvements after upper-extremity robot-assisted rehabilitation in stroke.Am J Occup Ther. 2014; 68: 325-333
- Predicting clinically significant changes in motor and functional outcomes after robot-assisted stroke rehabilitation.Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014; 95: 316-321
- Best practice for arm recovery post stroke: an international application.Physiotherapy. 2015; 101: e22-e23
- Management of the post stroke hemiplegic arm and hand: treatment recommendations of the 2001 consensus panel.Heart and Stroke Foundation, Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada2001
- Virtual reality in the rehabilitation of the upper limb after stroke: the user’s perspective.Cyberpsychol Behav. 2006; 9: 137-141
- Virtual reality games for movement rehabilitation in neurological conditions: how do we meet the needs and expectations of the users?.Disabil Rehabil. 2012; 34: 1880-1886
- A guide to interpretation of studies investigating subgroups of responders to physical therapy interventions.Phys Ther. 2009; 89: 698-704
- Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for medical researchers.Indian Pediatr. 2011; 48: 277-287
Article info
Publication history
Footnotes
Supported in part by the National Health Research Institutes (grant no. NHRI-EX103-10010PI), the Ministry of Science and Technology (grant nos. MOST 103-2314-B-182-002, MOST 103-2314-B-182-004-MY3, and MOST 102-2314-B-002-154-MY2), the Healthy Aging Research Center of Chang Gung University (grant nos. EMRPD1D0291 and CMRPD1B0331), and the Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (grant no. CMRPD 1C0402).
Disclosures: none.