Abstract
Objective
To identify sex-based differences in self-reported and close other–reported perceptions
of communication behaviors in adults with traumatic brain injury (TBI).
Design
Between-groups comparison of questionnaire data from men and women with TBI and their
close others.
Setting
University academic department.
Participants
Adults with medically documented TBI (n=160) and adults without TBI (n=81; control
group) (N=241).
Interventions
Not applicable.
Main Outcome Measure
La Trobe Communication Questionnaire, a standardized measure of communication problems
in everyday life.
Results
Participants with TBI endorsed more communication problems than controls (P<.001). There were no significant differences in self-ratings (P=.20) or in the ratings of close others (P=.09) in communication behaviors of men with TBI compared with women with TBI. There
was no difference between the self-ratings of women with TBI and their close others
(P=.59). However, men with TBI significantly underreported communication problems compared
with reports of close others (P<.001).
Conclusions
Women with TBI might be more accurate than men with TBI in recognizing their own pragmatic
communication problems.
Keywords
List of abbreviations:
GCS (Glasgow Coma Scale), LCQ (La Trobe Communication Questionnaire), PTA (posttraumatic amnesia)To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Archives of Physical Medicine and RehabilitationAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- Linguistic deficits after closed head injury: a current appraisal.Aphasiology. 1990; 4: 353-370
- Analysis of conversational discourse in head injured adults.J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1991; 6: 92-99
- Conversational discourse in closed-head-injured and non-brain-injured adults.Aphasiology. 2002; 16: 659-672
- Conversational discourse abilities following severe traumatic brain injury: a follow-up study.Brain Inj. 1998; 12: 911-935
- Cohesion in the discourse of normal and head-injured adults.J Speech Hear Res. 1987; 30: 88-98
- Conversational assessment following traumatic brain injury: a world comparison across two control groups.Brain Inj. 1997; 11: 409-429
- Evaluating the causes of impaired irony comprehension following traumatic brain injury.Aphasiology. 2005; 19: 712-730
- Exploring theory of mind after severe traumatic brain injury.Cortex. 2009; 46: 1088-1099
- Inference in conversation of adults with traumatic brain injury.Brain Inj. 2012; 26: 1118-1126
- Living with cognitive-communicative difficulties following traumatic brain injury: using a model of interpersonal communication to characterize the subjective experience.Aphasiology. 1997; 11: 889-911
- Marital dyad perceptions of injured partners’ communication following traumatic brain injury.Brain Impair. 2005; 6: 1-12
- Conversation analysis of communication breakdown after closed head injury.Brain Inj. 1998; 12: 1-14
- Analysing discourse in the traumatic brain injury population: telephone interactions with different communication partners.Brain Inj. 1997; 11: 169-189
- Should my shirt be tucked in or left out? The communication context of adolescence.Aphasiology. 2000; 14: 349-364
- Selling the story: narratives and charisma in adults with TBI.Brain Inj. 2011; 25: 844-857
- Course of insight disorder and emotional dysfucnction following closed head injury: a controlled cross-sectional follow-up study.J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1993; 15: 503-515
- Perceptions of communication abilities for persons with traumatic brain injury: validity of the La Trobe Communication Questionnaire.Brain Inj. 2008; 22: 940-951
- Examining the contribution of social communication abilities and affective/behavioral functioning to social integration outcomes for adults with traumatic brain injury.J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2011; 26: 30-42
- Do women fare worse: a metaanalysis of gender differences in traumatic brain injury outcome.J Neurosurg. 2000; 93: 539-545
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Traumatic Brain Injury in the United States: Fact Sheet. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/traumaticbraininjury/get_the_facts.html. Accessed May 10, 2014.
- Assessment of perception of morphed facial expressions using the Emotion Recognition Task: normative data from healthy participants aged 8-75.J Neuropsychol. 2014; 8: 75-93
- Are women better mindreaders? Sex differences in neural correlates of mentalizing detected with functional MRI.BMC Neurosci. 2009; 10: 9
- A meta-analytic review of sex differences in facial expression processing and their development in infants, children, and adolescents.Psychol Bull. 2000; 126: 424-453
- Theory of mind in preadolescence: relations between social understanding and social competence.Social Devel. 1999; 8: 237-255
- Another advanced test of theory of mind: evidence from very high functioning adults with autism or Asperger syndrome.J Child Psychol Psychiatr. 1997; 38: 813-822
- Recognition of faux pas by normally developing children and children with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism.J Autism Devel Dis. 1999; 29: 407-418
- Oxytocin, sexually dimorphic features of the social brain, and autism.Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2009; 63: 129-140
- Interpersonal processes in close relationships.Annu Rev Psychol. 1988; 39: 609-672
- Gender effects in decoding nonverbal cues.Psychol Bull. 1978; 85: 845-857
- Conversation-based assessment of social cognition in adults with traumatic brain injury.Brain Inj. 2008; 22: 397-409
- Sex differences in theory of mind: a male advantage on Happé's cartoon task.Cog Emot. 2012; 21: 1554-1564
- Self-report of extent of recovery and barriers to recovery after traumatic brain injury: a longitudinal study.Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001; 82: 1025-1030
- Gender differences in facial expression recognition in survivors of pediatric brain tumors.Psychooncol. 2009; 18: 893-897
- Emotion recognition following pediatric traumatic brain injury: longitudinal analysis of emotional prosody and facial emotion recognition.Neuropsychologia. 2010; 48: 2869-2877
- Intact theory of mind in TBI with behavioural disturbance.Brain Cogn. 2006; 60: 196-198
- Social communication skills in persons with post-acute traumatic brain injury: three perspectives.Brain Inj. 2006; 20: 425-435
- Social competence and head injury: a practical approach.Brain Inj. 1997; 11: 621-628
- Gender schema theory. A cognitive account of sex typing.Psychol Rev. 1981; 88: 354-364
- Androgyny and gender schema theory: a conceptual and empirical integration.in: Sonderegger B. Nebraska symposium on motivation: psychology and gender. Univ of Nebraska Pr, Lincoln1985: 179-226
- Gender and discourse.Oxford Univ Pr, New York1994
- Masculinity and femininity in contemporary American society: a reevaluation using the Bem Sex-Role Inventory.Sex Roles. 2000; 43: 499-528
- Gender and traumatic brain injury: do the sexes fare differently?.Brain Inj. 2007; 21: 1023-1030
- Medical aspects of head injury.Medicine in North America. 1986; 36: 5210-5238
- Comparison of indices of traumatic brain injury severity: Glasgow Coma Scale, length of coma and post-traumatic amnesia.J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr. 2008; 79: 678-685
- Measuring perception of communication ability: the development and evaluation of the La Trobe communication questionnaire.Aphasiology. 2000; 14: 251-268
- Exploring the factor structure of the La Trobe Communication Questionnaire: insights into the nature of communication deficits following traumatic brain injury.Aphasiology. 2007; 21: 1181-1194
- Using the La Trobe Communication Questionnaire to measure perceived social communication ability in adolescents with traumatic brain injury.Brain Impair. 2011; 11: 171-182
- Interpreting facial expression and communication competence following severe traumatic brain injury.Aphasiology. 2006; 20: 707-722
- The relative importance of metacognitive skills, emotional status, and executive function in psychosocial adjustment following acquired brain injury.J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2005; 20: 315-332
- Characteristics of impaired awareness after traumatic brain injury.J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 1998; 4: 380-387
- Treatment of unawareness of deficits in patients with acquired brain injury: a systematic review.J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2014; 29: E9-30
- Perceptions of communication skills in severely brain-injured adults.in: Ponsford J. Anderson V. Snow P. In: International Perspectives on Traumatic Brain Injury Proceedings of the Fifth International Association for the Study of Traumatic Brain Injury Conference; Melbourne (Australia). Australian Academic Pr, Brisbane1997: 247-250
- Self/close other report and communication skills following severe traumatic brain injury.Brain Impair. 2000; 1: 57
- Traumatic brain injury, neuroimaging, and neurodegeneration.Front Hum Neurosci. 2013; 7: 395
- Neuroimaging and neuropathology of TBI.NeuroRehabilitation. 2011; 28: 63-74
Article info
Publication history
Published online: February 05, 2015
Footnotes
Supported in part by the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, U.S. Department of Education (grant nos. H133G010152, Assessment of Pragmatic communication Abilities after Traumatic Brain Injury; H133B031117, Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on Community Integration of Persons with Traumatic Brain Injury; H133A070043, Texas Traumatic Brain Injury Model System at Texas Institute of Rehabilitation Research Memorial Hermann) and the Walker Foundation.
Publication of this article was supported by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine.
Disclosures: none.
Identification
Copyright
© 2016 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
