Advertisement

Environmental Barriers and Supports to Everyday Participation: A Qualitative Insider Perspective From People With Disabilities

      Abstract

      Objective

      To describe environmental factors that influence participation of people with disabilities.

      Design

      Constant comparative, qualitative analyses of transcripts from 36 focus groups across 5 research projects.

      Setting

      Home, community, work, and social participation settings.

      Participants

      Community-dwelling people (N=201) with diverse disabilities (primarily spinal cord injury, traumatic brain injury, and stroke) from 8 states.

      Interventions

      None.

      Main Outcome Measures

      Environmental barriers and supports to participation.

      Results

      We developed a conceptual framework to describe how environmental factors influence the participation of people with disabilities, highlighting 8 domains of environmental facilitators and barriers (built, natural, assistive technology, transportation, information and technology access, social support and attitudes, systems and policies, economics) and a transactional model showing the influence of environmental factors on participation at the micro (individual), mesa (community), and macro (societal) levels. Focus group data validated some International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health environmental categories while also bringing unique factors (eg, information and technology access, economic quality of life) to the fore. Data were used to construct items to enable people with disabilities to assess the impact of environmental factors on everyday participation from their firsthand experience.

      Conclusions

      Participants with disabilities voiced the need to evaluate the impact of the environment on their participation at the immediate, community, and societal levels. The results have implications for assessing environmental facilitators and barriers to participation within rehabilitation and community settings, evaluating outcomes of environmental interventions, and effecting system and policy changes to target environmental barriers that may result in societal participation disparities versus opportunities.

      Keywords

      List of abbreviations:

      ICF (International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health), SCI (spinal cord injury), TBI (traumatic brain injury)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

      1. Merriam Webster online collegiate dictionary. 11th ed. Springfield: Merriam-Webster, Incorporated; 2014. Available at: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/environment. Accessed December 1, 2014.

        • Charlton J.I.
        Nothing about us without us: disability oppression and empowerment.
        Univ of California Pr, Berkeley2000
        • Hahn H.
        Introduction: disability policy and the problem of discrimination.
        Am Behav Sci. 1985; 28: 293-318
        • Oliver M.
        • Bochel H.M.
        The politics of disablement.
        Int J Rehabil Res. 1991; 14: 185
      2. Centers for Disease Control. Social determinants of health definitions. Atlanta: CDC; 2014. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/socialdeterminants/Definitions.html. Accessed December 1, 2014.

        • Mishler E.G.
        Validation in inquiry-guided research: the role of exemplars in narrative studies.
        Harv Educ Rev. 1990; 60: 415-443
        • Magasi S.
        • Hammel J.
        • Heinemann A.
        • Whiteneck G.
        • Bogner J.
        Participation: A comparative analysis of multiple rehabilitation stakeholders’ perspectives.
        J Rehabil Med. 2009; 41: 936-944
      3. Institute of Medicine. The future of disability in America. Available at: http://www.iom.edu/Reports/2007/The-Future-of-Disability-in-America.aspx. Accessed December 1, 2014.

        • Whiteneck G.
        • Dijkers M.P.
        Difficult to measure constructs: conceptual and methodological issues concerning participation and environmental factors.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009; 90: S22-35
        • Magasi S.
        • Wong A.
        • Gray D.B.
        • et al.
        Theoretical foundations for the measurement of environmental factors and their impact on participation among people with disabilities.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015; 96: 569-577
        • World Health Organization
        International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health.
        World Health Organization, Geneva2001
        • Noonan V.K.
        • Kopec J.A.
        • Noreau L.
        • Singer J.
        • Dvorak M.F.
        A review of participation instruments based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health.
        Disabil Rehabil. 2009; 31: 1883-1901
        • Heinemann A.W.
        • Lai J.S.
        • Magasi S.
        • et al.
        Measuring participation enfranchisement.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011; 92: 564-571
        • Gray D.B.
        • Hollingsworth H.H.
        • Stark S.L.
        • Morgan K.A.
        Participation survey/mobility: psychometric properties of a measure of participation for people with mobility impairments and limitations.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006; 87: 189-197
        • Carlozzi N.E.
        • Tulsky D.S.
        • Kisala P.A.
        Traumatic brain injury patient-reported outcome measure: identification of health-related quality-of-life issues relevant to individuals with traumatic brain injury.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011; 92: S52-60
        • Gray D.B.
        • Hollingsworth H.H.
        • Stark S.
        • Morgan K.A.
        A subjective measure of environmental facilitators and barriers to participation for people with mobility limitations.
        Disabil Rehabil. 2008; 30: 434-457
        • Hammel J.
        • Magasi S.
        • Heinemann A.
        • Whiteneck G.
        • Bogner J.
        • Rodriguez E.
        What does participation mean? An insider perspective from people with disabilities.
        Disabil Rehabil. 2008; 30: 1445-1460
        • Heinemann A.W.
        • Magasi S.
        • Bode R.K.
        • et al.
        Measuring enfranchisement: importance of and control over participation by people with disabilities.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013; 94: 2157-2165
        • Heinemann A.W.
        • Magasi S.
        • Hammel J.
        • et al.
        Environmental factors item development for persons with stroke, traumatic brain injury and spinal cord injury.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015; 96: 589-595
        • Tulsky D.S.
        • Kisala P.A.
        • Lai J.S.
        • Carlozzi N.
        • Hammel J.
        • Heinemann A.W.
        Developing an item bank to measure economic quality of life for individuals with disabilities.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015; 96: 604-613
        • Gray D.B.
        • Gould M.
        • Bickenbach J.E.
        Environmental barriers and disability.
        J Archit Plan Res. 2003; 20: 29-37
        • Tulsky D.S.
        • Kisala P.A.
        • Victorson D.
        • et al.
        Developing a contemporary patient-reported outcomes measure for spinal cord injury.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011; 92: S44-51
        • Charmaz K.
        Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis.
        Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, 2006
        • Charmaz K.
        • Belgrave L.
        in SAGE Handb. Interview Res. Complex. Craft.
        in: Gubrium J.F. SAGE, 2012: 311-330
        • Morse J.
        • Stern P.M.
        • Corbin J.
        • Bowers B.
        • Charmaz K.
        • Clarke A.E.
        Developing grounded theory: the second generation.
        Left Coast Pr, Walnut Creek2009
        • Krueger R.A.
        • Casey M.A.
        Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research.
        SAGE, 2008
        • Calderón J.L.
        • Baker R.S.
        • Wolf K.E.
        Focus groups: a qualitative method complementing quantitative research for studying culturally diverse groups.
        Educ Health (Abingdon). 2000; 13: 91-95
        • Willgerodt M.A.
        Using focus groups to develop culturally relevant instruments.
        West J Nurs Res. 2003; 25: 798-814
        • Barr O.
        • McConkey R.
        • McConaghie J.
        Views of people with learning difficulties about current and future accommodation: the use of focus groups to promote discussion.
        Disabil Soc. 2003; 18: 577-597
        • Magasi S.
        • Ryan G.
        • Revicki D.
        • et al.
        Content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: perspectives from a PROMIS meeting.
        Qual Life Res. 2012; 21: 739-746
        • DeWalt D.A.
        • Rothrock N.
        • Yount S.
        • Stone A.A.
        Evaluation of item candidates: the PROMIS qualitative item review.
        Med Care. 2007; 45: S12-21
      4. PROMIS® Validity Standards Committee on behalf of the PROMIS Network of Investigators. PROMIS® instrument development and validation scientific standards. 2012. Available at: http://www.nihpromis.org/science/methodology. Accessed December 1, 2014.

        • Huberman A.M.
        • Miles M.B.
        Data management and analysis methods.
        in: Denzin N.K. Lincoln Y.S. Handb. Qual. Res. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks1994: 428-444
        • Brod M.
        • Tesler L.E.
        • Christensen T.L.
        Qualitative research and content validity: developing best practices based on science and experience.
        Qual Life Res. 2009; 18: 1263-1278
      5. Gray DB, Morgan KA, Dashner J, Garrett L, Hollingsworth HH. Personal and environmental influences on the community participation by people with mobility, visual and hearing impairments and limitations. In: American Public Health Association Conference; 2012 Oct 27-31; San Francisco, CA. Washington (DC): APHA; 2012.

        • Saldana J.
        The coding manual for qualitative researchers.
        SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks2012
        • Commission on Social Determinants of Health
        Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health: final report of the Commission on Social Determinants of Health.
        World Health Organization, Geneva2008
        • Schulz A.
        • Northridge M.E.
        Social determinants of health: The sociobiological translation.
        Health Educ Behav. 2004; 31: 455-471
        • Tarlov A.R.
        Social determinants of health: The sociobiological translation.
        in: Blane D. Brunner E. Wilkinson R.G. Health Soc Organ Health Policy Twenty-First Century. Routledge, London1996: 71-93
        • Lawton M.P.
        • Windley P.G.
        • Byerts T.O.
        Aging and the environment: theoretical approaches.
        Springer, New York1982
        • Bronfenbrenner U.
        Environments in developmental perspective: theoretical and operational models.
        in: Friedman S.L. Wachs T.D. Measuring environment across the life span: emerging methods and concepts. American Psychological Association, Washington (DC)1999: 3-28

      Linked Article