Advertisement
Original article| Volume 96, ISSUE 3, P426-431, March 2015

Physical Activity in Primary Versus Secondary Prevention Indication Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Recipients 6–12 Months After Implantation – A Cross-Sectional Study With Register Follow Up

Published:November 14, 2014DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2014.11.001

      Abstract

      Objectives

      To describe physical activity status among patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) according to the indication for ICD implant compared with international guidelines and compared with a matched healthy reference population to detect potential for improved physical outcomes; to describe patients' beliefs regarding participation in physical exercise by ICD indication; to describe factors predicting low physical activity; and to describe physical activity as a predictor of mortality.

      Design

      National survey with register follow-up. Comparisons were made to a matched healthy reference population, and patients were followed in registers for 15 months.

      Setting

      Patients are identified from national registers and questionnaires are distributed by postal mail.

      Participants

      All diagnostic profiles and indications were included as were both single-chamber ICD and biventricular ICD (N=499).

      Interventions

      Not applicable.

      Main Outcome Measures

      Questions regarding physical activity and the International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form were used to assess physical activity.

      Results

      The response rate was 71.7%. The mean age of participants was 65.5 years, with 82% of participants being men. Of the participants, 37% participated in a rehabilitation program, and 21% were sedentary compared with 8% in the reference population (P<.0001). Only 13% of patients followed physical exercise guidelines. Low physical activity was predicted by primary prevention indication (odds ratio [OR]=2.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3–4.7) and higher comorbidity (OR=2.1; 95% CI, 1.0–4.1; P<.05). Finally, low physical activity was associated with increased mortality (OR=3.9; 95% CI, 1.11–13.71; P<.05); however, it was not statistically significant when adjusted for age, sex, marital status, and comorbidity.

      Conclusions

      Guidelines for exercise and participation in rehabilitation are not met for this population, leaving a great potential for future interventions to improve the clinical outcomes, which are modifiable by exercise.

      Keywords

      List of abbreviations:

      ICD (implantable cardioverter defibrillator), IPAQ-SF (International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form), MET (metabolic equivalent task)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Dunbar S.B.
        • Dougherty C.M.
        • Sears S.F.
        • et al.
        Educational and psychological interventions to improve outcomes for recipients of implantable cardioverter defibrillators and their families: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association.
        Circulation. 2012; 126: 2146-2172
        • Piepoli M.F.
        • Corra U.
        • Adamopoulos S.
        • et al.
        Secondary prevention in the clinical management of patients with cardiovascular diseases. Core components, standards and outcome measures for referral and delivery: A Policy Statement from the Cardiac Rehabilitation Section of the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation. Endorsed by the Committee for Practice Guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology.
        Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2014; 21: 664-681
        • Davids J.S.
        • McPherson C.A.
        • Earley C.
        • Batsford W.P.
        • Lampert R.
        Benefits of cardiac rehabilitation in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: a patient survey.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005; 86: 1924-1928
        • Dougherty C.M.
        • Glenny R.
        • Kudenchuk P.J.
        Aerobic exercise improves fitness and heart rate variability after an implantable cardioverter defibrillator.
        J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2008; 28: 307-311
        • Meillier L.K.
        • Nielsen K.M.
        • Larsen F.B.
        • Larsen M.L.
        Socially differentiated cardiac rehabilitation: can we improve referral, attendance and adherence among patients with first myocardial infarction?.
        Scand J Public Health. 2012; 40: 286-293
        • Lynge E.
        • Sandegaard J.L.
        • Rebolj M.
        The Danish National Patient Register.
        Scand J Public Health. 2011; 39: 30-33
        • Ekholm O.
        • Hesse U.
        • Davidsen M.
        • Kjoller M.
        The study design and characteristics of the Danish national health interview surveys.
        Scand J Public Health. 2009; 37: 758-765
        • Christensen A.I.
        • Ekholm O.
        • Glumer C.
        • et al.
        The Danish National Health Survey 2010. Study design and respondent characteristics.
        Scand J Public Health. 2012; 40: 391-397
        • Craig C.L.
        • Marshall A.L.
        • Sjostrom M.
        • et al.
        International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity.
        Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003; 35: 1381-1395
        • Wurgler M.W.
        • Sonne L.T.
        • Kilsmark J.
        • Voss H.
        • Sogaard J.
        Danish heart patients' participation in and experience with rehabilitation.
        Scand J Public Health. 2012; 40: 126-132
        • Epstein A.E.
        • DiMarco J.P.
        • Ellenbogen K.A.
        • et al.
        ACC/AHA/HRS 2008 Guidelines for Device-Based Therapy of Cardiac Rhythm Abnormalities: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 Guideline Update for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices) developed in collaboration with the American Association for Thoracic Surgery and Society of Thoracic Surgeons.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008; 51: e1-62
        • Tu J.V.
        • Austin P.C.
        • Walld R.
        • Roos L.
        • Agras J.
        • McDonald K.M.
        Development and validation of the Ontario acute myocardial infarction mortality prediction rules.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001; 37: 992-997
        • Pedersen C.B.
        The Danish Civil Registration System.
        Scand J Public Health. 2011; 39: 22-25
        • Davies E.J.
        • Moxham T.
        • Rees K.
        • et al.
        Exercise based rehabilitation for heart failure.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010; 4: CD003331
      1. Berg SK, Pedersen PU, Zwisler AD, et al. Comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation improves outcome for patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillator. Findings from the COPE-ICD randomised clinical trial. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs 2014 Feb 5 [Epub ahead of print].

        • Adams S.A.
        • Matthews C.E.
        • Ebbeling C.B.
        • et al.
        The effect of social desirability and social approval on self-reports of physical activity.
        Am J Epidemiol. 2005; 161: 389-398
        • Kumler T.
        • Gislason G.H.
        • Kirk V.
        • et al.
        Accuracy of a heart failure diagnosis in administrative registers.
        Eur J Heart Fail. 2008; 10: 658-660