Advertisement
Original article| Volume 96, ISSUE 1, P91-97, January 2015

Download started.

Ok

Finger Movement Function After Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Pulley Release for Trigger Finger: Effects of Postoperative Rehabilitation

Published:September 20, 2014DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2014.09.001

      Highlights

      • Effects of postoperative rehabilitation for trigger finger with joint contracture are shown.
      • Quantitative evaluation of trigger finger function before and after surgery is shown.
      • Participants who received rehabilitation demonstrated greater improvements.

      Abstract

      Objective

      To develop and test a postoperative rehabilitation protocol for use by individuals with trigger finger undergoing ultrasound-guided percutaneous pulley release.

      Design

      Nonrandomized controlled trial.

      Setting

      Hospital and local community.

      Participants

      Individuals suffering from trigger finger with joint contracture (N=21) were recruited and grouped into an intervention group (n=9) or a control group (n=12).

      Interventions

      All the participants underwent the same surgical procedure performed by the same surgeon. A 4-week postoperative rehabilitation program was designed based on the wound healing process. The intervention group received postoperative rehabilitation after the surgery, whereas the control group received no treatment after the surgery.

      Main Outcome Measures

      The finger movement functions were quantitatively evaluated before and 1 month after the surgery using a 3-dimensional motion capture system. The fingertip workspace and joint range of motion (ROM) were evaluated while the participant was performing a sequential 5-posture movement, including finger extension, intrinsic plus, straight fist, full fist, and hook fist.

      Results

      The intervention group demonstrated significantly more improvements than the control group in the fingertip workspace (49% vs 17%), ROM of the distal interphalangeal (DIP) joint (16% vs 4%), ROM of the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint (21% vs 5%), and total active ROM (17% vs 5%).

      Conclusions

      This pilot study evaluated a postoperative rehabilitation protocol for trigger finger and demonstrated its effects on various finger functions. Participants who underwent the rehabilitation program had significantly more improvements in the fingertip workspace, ROM of the DIP and PIP joints, and total active ROM.

      Keywords

      List of abbreviations:

      A1 (first annular), DIP (distal interphalangeal), MP (metacarpophalangeal), PIP (proximal interphalangeal), ROM (range of motion)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Froimson A.I.
        Tenosynovitis and tennis elbow.
        in: Green D.P. Hotchikiss R.N. Pederson W.C. Green’s operative hand surgery. Churchill Livingstone, Philadelphia1999: 1989-1991
        • Tung W.L.
        • Kuo L.C.
        • Lai K.Y.
        • Jou I.M.
        • Sun Y.N.
        • Su F.C.
        Quantitative evidence of kinematics and functional differences in different graded trigger fingers.
        Clin Biomech. 2010; 25: 535-540
        • Lu S.C.
        • Kuo L.C.
        • Jou I.M.
        • et al.
        Quantifying catch-and-release: the extensor tendon force needed to overcome the catching flexors in trigger fingers.
        J Orthop Res. 2013; 31: 1130-1135
        • Saldana M.J.
        Trigger digits: diagnosis and treatment.
        J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2001; 9: 246-252
        • Akhtar S.
        • Bradley M.J.
        • Quinton D.N.
        • Burke F.D.
        Management and referral for trigger finger/thumb.
        BMJ. 2005; 331: 30-33
        • Ryzewicz M.
        • Wolf J.M.
        Trigger digits: principles, management, and complications.
        J Hand Surg [Am]. 2006; 31: 135-146
        • Chern T.C.
        • Jou I.M.
        • Yen S.H.
        • Lai K.A.
        • Shao C.J.
        Cadaveric study of sonographically assisted percutaneous release of the A1 pulley.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005; 115: 811-822
        • Jou I.M.
        • Chern T.C.
        Sonographically assisted percutaneous release of the a1 pulley: a new surgical technique for treating trigger digit.
        J Hand Surg [Br]. 2006; 31: 191-199
        • Kuo L.C.
        • Su F.C.
        • Tung W.L.
        • Lai K.Y.
        • Jou I.M.
        Kinematical and functional improvements of trigger digits after sonographically assisted percutaneous release of the A1 pulley.
        J Orthop Res. 2009; 27: 891-896
        • Bruijnzeel H.
        • Neuhaus V.
        • Fostvedt S.
        • Jupiter J.B.
        • Mudgal C.S.
        • Ring D.C.
        Adverse events of open A1 pulley release for idiopathic trigger finger.
        J Hand Surg [Am]. 2012; 37: 1650-1656
        • Lee M.P.
        • Nasser-Sharif S.
        • Zelouf D.S.
        Surgeon's and therapist's management of tendonopathies in the hand and wrist.
        in: Mackin E.J. Callahan A.D. Skirven T.M. Schneider L. Osterman A.L. Rehabilitation of the hand and upper extremity. Mosby, Maryland Heights2002: 931-953
        • Brotzman S.B.
        • Wilk K.E.
        Handbook of orthopaedic rehabilitation.
        Mosby, Maryland Heights2007
        • Chiu H.Y.
        • Su F.C.
        • Wang S.T.
        • Hsu H.Y.
        The motion analysis system and goniometry of the finger joints.
        J Hand Surg [Br]. 1998; 23: 788-791
        • Su F.C.
        • Chou Y.L.
        • Yang C.S.
        • Lin G.T.
        • An K.N.
        Movement of finger joints induced by synergistic wrist motion.
        Clin Biomech. 2005; 20: 491-497
        • Chiu H.Y.
        A method of two-dimensional measurement for evaluating finger motion impairment: a description of the method and comparison with angular measurement.
        J Hand Surg [Br]. 1995; 20: 691-695
        • Chiu H.Y.
        • Su F.C.
        • Wang S.T.
        The motion analysis system and the fingertip motion area: normal values in young adults.
        J Hand Surg [Br]. 1998; 23: 53-56
        • Moriya K.
        • Uchiyama T.
        • Kawaji Y.
        Comparison of the surgical outcomes for trigger finger and trigger thumb: preliminary results.
        Hand Surg. 2005; 10: 83-86
        • Favre Y.
        • Kinnen L.
        Resection of the flexor digitorum superficialis for trigger finger with proximal interphalangeal joint positional contracture.
        J Hand Surg [Am]. 2012; 37: 2269-2272
        • Griffin M.
        • Hindocha S.
        • Jordan D.
        • Saleh M.
        • Khan W.
        Management of extensor tendon injuries.
        Open Orthop J. 2012; 6: 36-42
        • Wehbé M.A.
        Tendon gliding exercises.
        Am J Occup Ther. 1987; 41: 164-167
        • Kasdan M.L.
        • Leis V.M.
        • Lewis K.
        • Kasdan A.S.
        Trigger finger: not always work related.
        J Ky Med Assoc. 1996; 94: 498-499